|
|
| (12 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{subpages}} | | {{subpages}} |
| | {{TOC|right}} |
| {{Image|Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium front page 2016-07-01 17-41-54.png|right|400px|Citizendium home page in July 2016.}} | | {{Image|Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium front page 2016-07-01 17-41-54.png|right|400px|Citizendium home page in July 2016.}} |
| [https://en.citizendium.org/ The '''Citizendium'''] (''si-tih-ZEN-dee-um'', "a citizens' compendium") is a [[wiki]]-based free [[encyclopedia]] project founded in 2007 by [[Larry Sanger]], who also co-founded [[Wikipedia]]. It allows users to write and edit articles on many subjects, as long as they register and edit under their real, verified name. Citizendium has a [[CZ:Policies|policy document]] which sets out its members' rights and responsibilities. | | [https://en.citizendium.org/ The '''Citizendium'''] (''si-tih-ZEN-dee-um'', "a citizens' compendium") is a [[wiki]]-based free [[encyclopedia]] project founded in 2007 by [[Larry Sanger]], who also co-founded [[Wikipedia]]. It allows users to write and edit articles on many subjects, as long as they register and edit under their real, verified name. Citizendium articles are released under a [[Creative Commons]] license that allows acknowledged duplication. We allow material from other wikis to be used with attribution. The project currently has {{PAGESINCAT:CZ Live}} articles in varying stages of development. |
|
| |
|
| Citizendium articles are released under a [[Creative Commons]] license that allows acknowledged duplication. We allow material from other wikis to be used with attribution. The project currently has {{PAGESINCAT:CZ Live}} articles in varying stages of development.
| | <big>A better summary is probably to be had '''[[CZ:Introduction_to_CZ_for_Wikipedians#Why Citizendium?|here]]'''. We no longer are following the "expert guidance" model used in prior years.</big> |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == NOTICE OF OUT-OF-DATE CONTENT==
| |
| | |
| <big>Quite a bit of the stuff below is now out of date (as of 2020). A better summary is probably to be had '''[[CZ:Introduction_to_CZ_for_Wikipedians#Why Citizendium?|here]]'''. We no longer are following the "expert guidance" model discussed below. I am putting this notice here until we get a chance to revise this entire page.</big>[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 20:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC) | |
| | |
| ----
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| {{TOC|left}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Structure== | | ==Structure== |
| Line 25: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| ===Real names=== | | ===Real names=== |
| Citizendium requires that all contributors edit under their real name, as this is thought to reduced [[vandalism]], encourage a civil atmosphere, and help readers to judge how accurate an article may be. Any applicant must not only declare that the name they have submitted is their own, but must submit evidence that verifies this. Common verification methods include use of a non-free e-mail address, such as one used at an educational institution or company, or the submission of scanned identity documents such as a driver's license (information other than the applicant's name may be blacked out). Minors are asked to provide less personal information, while applicants seeking to become Editors are required to provide more extensive evidence of their qualifications or experience. All contributors must also maintain a public biography about themselves, to give readers some idea of the knowledge or abilities the Citizen has brought to their edits. | | Citizendium requires that all contributors be logged in and edit under their real name, as this is thought to reduced vandalism, encourage a civil atmosphere, and help readers to judge how accurate an article may be. Any applicant must not only declare that the name they have submitted is their own, but must submit evidence that verifies this. Common verification methods include use of a non-free e-mail address, such as one used at an educational institution or company, or the submission of scanned identity documents such as a driver's license (information other than the applicant's name may be blacked out). Minors are asked to provide less personal information. All contributors must also maintain at least a short public biography about themselves, to give readers some idea of the knowledge or abilities the Citizen has brought to their edits. |
|
| |
|
| In contrast to the [[pseudonym]]s common on Wikipedia, Citizendium contributors believe the use of real names adds to the credibility and accuracy of Citizendium articles. | | In contrast to the [[pseudonym]]s common on Wikipedia, Citizendium contributors believe the use of real names adds to the credibility and accuracy of Citizendium articles and that real names lead to the likelihood of more courteous interactions among contributors. |
|
| |
|
| ===Citable articles=== | | ===Citable articles=== |
| An Editor could declare a version of an article essentially complete and of reasonably good quality. A copy of this approved version was made available, locked to further editing, on a subpage of the main article. The article itself remains freely editable and can later be re-approved and replace the citable version. At present, we are not creating any new Citable articles.
| | Some years ago, a (then) Editor could declare a version of an article essentially complete and of reasonably good quality. A copy of this approved version was made available, locked to further editing, on a subpage of the main article. The article itself remains freely editable and can later be re-approved and replace the citable version. |
|
| |
|
| ===Article inclusion policy=== | | ===Article inclusion policy=== |
| Citizendium has no equivalent of a "notability" policy, so articles on subjects which many readers might consider obscure may be accepted. Instead, the project has an [[CZ:ARticle Inclusion Policy|article inclusion policy]] which sets out the reasons under which a page may be deleted or archived on content grounds. These grounds include: significant weaknesses in the material; lack of importance to the project; little chance of the material being improved due to lack of interest. | | Citizendium has the following [[CZ:Content_Policy|content policy]]. There is no requirement that article topics be "notable", which means Citizendium does not exclude topics solely on the ground that their topics have not been covered extensively in the media or reliable online websites. Citizendium asserts that what may be completely trivial to one person might in fact be quite important to another, and our content policy allows you, for example, to write an article about a small, obscure local park. |
| | |
| ==Project goals==
| |
| {{Image|CZ Image.jpg|right|250px|Citizendium home page in May 2009.}}
| |
| | |
| ===Neutrality===
| |
| Citizendium adopted a Neutrality Policy<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Neutrality_Policy|title=Neutrality Policy|date=09-05-2007|accessdate=09-05-2007}}</ref> that was based on an early version of Wikipedia's neutrality policy (circa December 2001), which had been drafted by Sanger. As of November 2016, the neutrality policy is bound by point (6) of the policy document:
| |
| | |
| *6) ''Citizendium articles shall be as neutral, comprehensive, accurate and comprehensible as possible while respecting the balance of scientific evidence.''
| |
| | |
| The Citizendium policy was previously subject to the [[CZ:Charter|Charter]], which remains as guidance:
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 4|Article 4]]: ''The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 18|Article 18]]: ''The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 2|Article 19]]: ''All articles shall treat their subjects comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively to the greatest degree possible in a well-written narrative, complementing text with other suitable material and media.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 23|Article 23]]: ''The Citizendium shall remain free of advocacy, advertisement and sensationalism.''
| |
| | |
| ===Responsibility===
| |
| Responsibility covers a broad scope within this project. Not only do members have responsibilities to the project and its contributors, but they also are responsible for the content they produce. The project has created policy that determines it will maximize attribution, either to an author or a source.
| |
| | |
| Additionally, the Citizendium guidelines propose that Editors and Authors alike have a responsibility to the public at large. It is the duty of all contributors to ensure that information on an article can be attributed to fact, and does not contain any questionable or unauthorized/copyrighted material, unless that required permission has been specifically granted for the use of the project.
| |
| | |
| There is also the great importance of projecting reliable information: if Citizendium articles are not accurate then the project cannot be credible. The goal is to create a "better free encyclopedia", and its users and content should aim to fulfill that.
| |
| | |
| Should there be any incident of irresponsibility or abject behavior or content, Citizendium has processes and policies in place that are able to deal with these in the most professional manner available, and those should be exercised first to prevent user conflict and infighting.
| |
| | |
| ==Governance==
| |
| The [[CZ:Policies|policy document]] provides two binding rules on governance as of November 2016:
| |
| | |
| *8) ''The Citizendium community or its representatives shall decide its own governance structure and who shall be responsible for administrative, financial, legal, content, behavioural and technical matters.''
| |
| | |
| *9) ''No Citizendium member shall be denied a fair, unbiased appeal process against a decision made against them on administrative, legal, or technical matters.''
| |
| | |
| The Citizendium [[CZ:Charter|Charter]] provided rules for the governance of the project within its community, but these have the status of guidance only as of November 2016. Examples include:
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 2|Article 2]]: ''All persons who apply for a Citizendium account shall do so under their real name and according to other criteria that may be established by the Citizendium Council. Application process shall be defined by the Citizendium Council. Participants in Citizendium agree to abide by this charter and other terms of participation as established by the Citizendium Council.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 4|Article 4]]: ''The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 5|Article 5]]: ''Citizens shall act responsibly and in a civil manner: derogatory or offensive language or behavior will not be tolerated...''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 11|Article 11]]: ''Citizens should expect Officers and Editors to be fair and impartial. Biased Officers and Editors shall recuse themselves from their official positions in any dispute resolution process.''
| |
| | |
| *[[CZ:Charter#Article 14|Article 14]]: ''Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Citizendium Council.''
| |
| | |
| The combination of these guidelines result in a project that, while still existing as an "open system", must have attribution, accuracy, and the unbridled freedom for subject matter experts to be a part of the project.
| |
| | |
| ===Governance changes===
| |
| Originally, executive decisions were the responsibility of the then-Editor-in-Chief, [[Larry Sanger]], who also founded the project. Governance subsequently became a matter for the first [[CZ:Editorial Council|Editorial Council]], which in turn was replaced by separate [[CZ:Management Council|Management]] and Editorial Councils established through the ratification of the [[CZ:Charter|Charter]]. These were merged into a single [[CZ:Council|Citizendium Council]] in 2013. The role of [[Archive:Ombudsman|Ombudsman]], originally empowered by the Charter to mediate disputes, was abolished in 2014 and its duties merged with those of the Managing Editor. Over time, the number of elected positions has fallen, from 33 in the original Editorial Council, to 14 through the first version of the Charter, and 4 as of July 2014. As of November 2016, there are no elected positions.
| |
| | |
| In November 2016, Citizendium voters unanimously decided to establish a new [[CZ:Policies|policy document]] and reduced both the Charter and other rules to the status of guidance only.
| |
| | |
| Until July 2016, the Moderator Group was known as the 'Constabulary' and its members as 'Constables'. The group was [[User:ElectionJune2016/Referenda/2|renamed]] in a referendum that year.
| |
| | |
| ==Licensing==
| |
| All original Citizendium content is available under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported] license. This license means that they may be altered and freely redistributed as long as the work is properly attributed and shared under the same or a similar license.
| |
| | |
| Composers of text, images, and artwork in Citizendium are free to republish it elsewhere as they wish, because as authors they keep their own copyright. As Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger explains, "The Citizendium has not declared that individuals are, by contributing content, thereby transferring or in any way sharing their copyright with the Citizendium Foundation."<ref>{{cite web|last=Sanger|first=Larry|date=December 2007|title=An explanation of the ''Citizendium'' license|url=http://www.citizendium.org/czlicense.html|publisher=Citizendium|accessdate=28 November 2013}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Reception==
| |
| On November 1st, 2007, Citizendium officially turned one-year old. To celebrate its birthday, Sanger produced a press release that presented a narrative snapshot of the current state of the project, in terms of its progress and to debunk some myths about its status. Also, a [[Slashdot]] post was made to mark the occasion.
| |
| | |
| Among web sites with the highest traffic, as of July 2016 Citizendium was [http://scripts.ranking.com/data/details.aspx?theurl=citizendium.org ranked around 72,000] by [http://www.ranking.com/ Ranking.com], a drop since mid-May 2011 from an earlier level of about 10,000-12,000. According to [[Alexa Internet|Alexa]], [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/citizendium.org Citizendium's main audience demographic] is mainly male and with a college education.
| |
| | |
| ===Criticism===
| |
| Objections to the Citizendium have been raised by journalists, bloggers and members of other wikis, particularly some Wikipedians. One early criticism focused on the wiki's guidance role for experts: the Citizendium cannot succeed because there is no such thing as an expert outside those institutions that specifically certify an individual as an expert; who is an "expert" depends on context.<ref>''Many2Many'': '[http://many.corante.com/archives/2006/09/18/larry_sanger_citizendium_and_the_problem_of_expertise.php Larry Sanger, Citizendium and the Problem of Expertise]'. Blog post by Clay Shirky, September 18 2006.</ref>
| |
|
| |
|
| A common complaint is that the fledgeling Citizendium is too small to compete with bigger websites;<ref>For example, see ''dot.life'': '[http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2008/03/will_wikipedia_always_win.html Will Wikipedia always win?]'. BBC blog post by Rory Cellan-Jones, March 31 2008.</ref> The strength of this argument would be diluted as the Citizendium gathered a larger contributor base over time and produced more articles.
| | However, the wiki does not allow articles that involve [[CZ:Policy_on_Self-Promotion|self-promotion]] or advocacy of causes. Debates about inclusion generally belong in [[Forum_Talk:Content]] but may also occur on the Discussion page of specific articles. |
|
| |
|
| ==Footnotes== | | ==Footnotes== |
| {{reflist|2}} | | {{reflist|2}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
(CC) Screenshot: Citizendium Citizendium home page in July 2016.
The Citizendium (si-tih-ZEN-dee-um, "a citizens' compendium") is a wiki-based free encyclopedia project founded in 2007 by Larry Sanger, who also co-founded Wikipedia. It allows users to write and edit articles on many subjects, as long as they register and edit under their real, verified name. Citizendium articles are released under a Creative Commons license that allows acknowledged duplication. We allow material from other wikis to be used with attribution. The project currently has 16,448 articles in varying stages of development.
A better summary is probably to be had here. We no longer are following the "expert guidance" model used in prior years.
Structure
The Citizendium is run according to a set of policies. The community itself, through consensus and discussion, is responsible for shaping the content of articles, as well as funding, appointments, and other administrative matters. In the past, members were elected or appointed to represent the project, make interim decisions and mediate disputes. At present, the wiki is operated by a small, dedicated group of volunteers.
Members of the project used to be called "Citizens" and were, at one time, divided into "Authors", who were regular project members, and "Editors", who were recognized experts. This model of operation was not successful, and now, all contributors are equal. Other roles include: the technical staff, who maintain the software and servers of the wiki; the Treasurer, who administers the project's finances; and the Editor in Chief and Assistant Editor, who may arbitrate controversies if it becomes necessary.
Open collaboration
Citizendium is similar to Wikipedia in that it is an open wiki: the public is invited to participate and edit most pages. Anonymous edits are not allowed, but in principle members can edit most pages.
Real names
Citizendium requires that all contributors be logged in and edit under their real name, as this is thought to reduced vandalism, encourage a civil atmosphere, and help readers to judge how accurate an article may be. Any applicant must not only declare that the name they have submitted is their own, but must submit evidence that verifies this. Common verification methods include use of a non-free e-mail address, such as one used at an educational institution or company, or the submission of scanned identity documents such as a driver's license (information other than the applicant's name may be blacked out). Minors are asked to provide less personal information. All contributors must also maintain at least a short public biography about themselves, to give readers some idea of the knowledge or abilities the Citizen has brought to their edits.
In contrast to the pseudonyms common on Wikipedia, Citizendium contributors believe the use of real names adds to the credibility and accuracy of Citizendium articles and that real names lead to the likelihood of more courteous interactions among contributors.
Citable articles
Some years ago, a (then) Editor could declare a version of an article essentially complete and of reasonably good quality. A copy of this approved version was made available, locked to further editing, on a subpage of the main article. The article itself remains freely editable and can later be re-approved and replace the citable version.
Article inclusion policy
Citizendium has the following content policy. There is no requirement that article topics be "notable", which means Citizendium does not exclude topics solely on the ground that their topics have not been covered extensively in the media or reliable online websites. Citizendium asserts that what may be completely trivial to one person might in fact be quite important to another, and our content policy allows you, for example, to write an article about a small, obscure local park.
However, the wiki does not allow articles that involve self-promotion or advocacy of causes. Debates about inclusion generally belong in Forum_Talk:Content but may also occur on the Discussion page of specific articles.
