User talk:Zachary W. Bos: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jess Key
m (Text replacement - "CZ:Constabulary" to "CZ:Moderator Group")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editor Policy|Editor Policy]]</small>
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editor Policy|Editor Policy]]</small>
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editorial Council|Editorial Council]]</small>
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Editorial Council|Editorial Council]]</small>
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Constabulary|Constabulary]]</small>
|align="center" NOWRAP|<small>[[CZ:Moderator Group|Constabulary]]</small>
|}
|}
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|<small>[[Welcome Page]]</small>
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|<small>[[Welcome Page]]</small>
Line 26: Line 26:


: Hi there and welcome to Citizendium! If you have any problems finding your way around the site or using the system let me know and I'll be happy to help. --[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 16:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
: Hi there and welcome to Citizendium! If you have any problems finding your way around the site or using the system let me know and I'll be happy to help. --[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 16:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
:: I think it will take me a while to see how my contributions could be useful. At the moment, I see that Magazines aren't subdivided -- literary magazines would be my specialty, and there isn't a suitable taxon, ahem, for them yet. Thank you for the welcoming.[[User:Zachary W. Bos|Zachary W. Bos]] 16:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
::: I'm thinking that literary magazines would fit nicely into the [[CZ:Media Workgroup|Media Workgroup]] and the [[CZ:Literature Workgroup|Literature Workgroup]]. Once there are enough articles about them it would be easily possible to create a Magazines Subgroup which join the two together. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to fit into categories at the start, perhaps the best way is to simply choose a topic and start writing! There are [[CZ:Start Article|three ways to begin an article]]. I would suggest starting with the easy way, and then moving on to the complete way once you have found your way around better. --[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 16:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
::::There's a very brief article, just a so-called "Stub" about [[Analog Science Fiction and Fact]], for which I've written over the years.  I did a lot of work on the Wikipedia article on the same topic, but haven't bothered to do the same here, sigh.  I see that it's been placed in the Literature Workgroup.  As Chris says, don't worry about the taxonomy of whatever you're interested in writing about.  Just get the article started and, if you yourself are unsure about where it should be classified, someone else will certainly come along fairly quickly and make some suggestions.  [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:04, 7 March 2024

Welcome!

Citizendium Getting Started
Register | Quick Start | About us | FAQ | The Author Role | The Editor Role
A dozen essentials | How to start a new article | For Wikipedians | Other
Home
Getting Started Organization Technical Help Content Policy Article Lists
Initiatives Communication Editor Policy Editorial Council Constabulary
Welcome Page

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You may ask me to create a personal sandbox for you where you can try out writing articles. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals and its a good idea to join the forums. You can ask any constable for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Milton Beychok 06:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi there and welcome to Citizendium! If you have any problems finding your way around the site or using the system let me know and I'll be happy to help. --Chris Key 16:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I think it will take me a while to see how my contributions could be useful. At the moment, I see that Magazines aren't subdivided -- literary magazines would be my specialty, and there isn't a suitable taxon, ahem, for them yet. Thank you for the welcoming.Zachary W. Bos 16:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm thinking that literary magazines would fit nicely into the Media Workgroup and the Literature Workgroup. Once there are enough articles about them it would be easily possible to create a Magazines Subgroup which join the two together. I wouldn't worry too much about trying to fit into categories at the start, perhaps the best way is to simply choose a topic and start writing! There are three ways to begin an article. I would suggest starting with the easy way, and then moving on to the complete way once you have found your way around better. --Chris Key 16:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
There's a very brief article, just a so-called "Stub" about Analog Science Fiction and Fact, for which I've written over the years. I did a lot of work on the Wikipedia article on the same topic, but haven't bothered to do the same here, sigh. I see that it's been placed in the Literature Workgroup. As Chris says, don't worry about the taxonomy of whatever you're interested in writing about. Just get the article started and, if you yourself are unsure about where it should be classified, someone else will certainly come along fairly quickly and make some suggestions. Hayford Peirce 17:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)