Archive:Should we use GFDL or CC-by-sa for CZ-originated articles?: Difference between revisions
imported>Haukur Þorgeirsson (Started page) |
imported>Haukur Þorgeirsson |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
= Affirmative: use only GFDL = | = Affirmative: use only GFDL = | ||
To maintain compabitility with Wikipedia it is by far easiest to use GFDL throughout because it is the licence Wikipedia uses for all its text. If we use GFDL for Wikipedia-originating articles and another licence for CZ-originating articles then we will be unable to move content between those two types. Moving paragraphs between articles is frequently a very useful natural thing to do when working with a wiki, for example when merging articles. Making it impossible to do this will | To maintain compabitility with Wikipedia it is by far easiest to use GFDL throughout because it is the licence Wikipedia uses for all its text. If we use GFDL for Wikipedia-originating articles and another licence for CZ-originating articles then we will be unable to move content between those two types. Moving paragraphs between articles is frequently a very useful natural thing to do when working with a wiki, for example when merging articles. Making it impossible to do this will frustrate and confuse editors not interested in subtle legal issues. | ||
= Negative: use CC-BY-SA = | = Negative: use CC-BY-SA = | ||
The GFDL is an old clunky licence which was never really intended for something like an encyclopedia. It requires redistributors to jump through annoying hoops to use content. CC-BY-SA is more flexible and more easily understood. | The GFDL is an old clunky licence which was never really intended for something like an encyclopedia. It requires redistributors to jump through annoying hoops to use content. CC-BY-SA is more flexible and more easily understood. | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 26 March 2007
Policy argument summary started March 26, 2007
The issue explained neutrally
At issue is the question whether the GFDL licence should be used for articles originating on Citizendium.
Affirmative: use only GFDL
To maintain compabitility with Wikipedia it is by far easiest to use GFDL throughout because it is the licence Wikipedia uses for all its text. If we use GFDL for Wikipedia-originating articles and another licence for CZ-originating articles then we will be unable to move content between those two types. Moving paragraphs between articles is frequently a very useful natural thing to do when working with a wiki, for example when merging articles. Making it impossible to do this will frustrate and confuse editors not interested in subtle legal issues.
Negative: use CC-BY-SA
The GFDL is an old clunky licence which was never really intended for something like an encyclopedia. It requires redistributors to jump through annoying hoops to use content. CC-BY-SA is more flexible and more easily understood.