Terrorism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Charles Sandberg
imported>Charles Sandberg
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:


==Characteristics of Terrorist attacks==
==Characteristics of Terrorist attacks==
(Under construction)


===Planning and organization===  
===Planning and organization===  
Line 42: Line 43:


==Counter-terrorism==  
==Counter-terrorism==  
(Under construction)


==History==  
==History==  
(Under construction)


===Origins of terrorism===  
===Origins of terrorism===  

Revision as of 09:19, 20 June 2007

The bombed remains of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City after a terrorist bomb exploded killing 168 and wounding another 800, 19 Apr. 1995.

Terrorism refers to any act, usually violent, meant to coerce behavior for political ends. Terrorism is used to bring fear to the population to obtain a certain political objective. Terrorism has been practiced by both right-wing and left-wing political organizations, nationalistic and religious groups, revolutionaries, as well as armies, police, and intelligence services. Since terrorist groups are generally small in numbers and have little resources available, terrorists rely on dramatic and destructive hit-and-run acts of violence to get the attention of the general population. Terrorists seek to obtain the influence among the population through the publicity of this violence.

Definition

Terrorism has many definitions.The term terrorism was first used in the 1790s to describe terror used by the revolutionaries during the French Revolution. [1]

Based on a survey of leading academics, there are at least 109 different definitions of terrorism (Schmidt & Jongman 1988). A compiled analysis of this survey identified the following recurring elements:

  • Violence, force (83.5%)
  • Political (65%)
  • Fear, emphasis on terror (51%)
  • Threats (47%)
  • Psychological effects and anticipated reactions (41.5%)
  • Discrepancy between the targets and the victims (37.5%)
  • Intentional, planned, systematic, organized action (32%)
  • Methods of combat, strategy, tactics (30.5%)

The common elements of terrorism, as stated by Ganor (2002), are “the use of, or threat to use, violence”; “the goal is to attain political objectives”; and “the targets of terrorism are civilians”. The most widely accepted legal definition is defined in Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f(d), which states: The term ‘terrorism’ means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.

State Sponsorship of Terrorism

There are basically three categories of state sponsorship of terrorism. These are as follows:

1. States supporting terrorism – “states that support terrorist organizations, providing financial aid, ideological support, military or operational assistance” (Ganor 2002)

2. States operating terrorism – “states that initiate, direct and perform terrorist activities through groups outside their own institutions” (Ganor 2002)

3. States perpetrating terrorism – “states perpetrating terrorist acts abroad through their own official bodies” (Ganor 2002) or perpetrating terrorist acts domestically (i.e. within its own borders).

Characteristics of Terrorist attacks

(Under construction)

Planning and organization

Targets

Weapons

Historically, bombing is the most common terrorist tactic. Bombs are the choice weapon of terrorists because they provide a dramatic, easy, and risk-free way of drawing attention to themselves. Building a crude bomb does not require much skill as does planting it and being far away when it exlplodes. Assasination, kidnapping, and assaults against well-defended targets require a much more sophisticated knowledge of organization, planning, and weaponry which bombings do not require. These bombs can consist of commercially produced explosives such as black powder, TNT, plastic explosives; or commercially available materials made into homemade explosives, such as fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) mixed with diesel fuel; these homemade explosives are called Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). [2] Bombs can be either explosive or incendiary and the most effective bombs usually employ a shaped charge that movess the force of the blast in a specific direction. Bombs can be detonated by time-delay detonators which rely on clocks, watches, and other timing devices; remote-control detonators which use radio or other electronic signals; command-wire detonators use a button which is pressed to trigger the explosion.

Many terrorists use automatic firearms such as assault rifles, pistols, and submachine guns; as well as other firearms such as revolvers, shotguns, machine guns, and hunting rifles with sniper sights. Terrorists have also used small-sized mortars and rocket-propelled grenades or RPGs; the most widely used model of this weapon being the RPG-7. [3] These weapons can pierce through layers of ceramic and rein-forced steel armor that protects military and police vehicles. Another favorite weapon of terrorists is the hand grenade and incidenary weapons like the molotov cocktail.

Fear of terrorist use of chemical and biological weapons increased after the 1995 sarin nerve gas attack on a Tokyo subway and the 2001 discovery of anthrax spores mailed in United States.

Counter-terrorism

(Under construction)

History

(Under construction)

Origins of terrorism

Terrorism in the 20th century

September, 11 attacks

Types of Terrorism

Notes

References & Readings

  • Conference of Foreign Ministers (2005). Kuala Lumpur Declaration on International Terrorism at [1]
  • Boyle, G. (2002). Theories of Justification and Political Violence: Examples from Four Groups. Terrorism and Political Violence. 14(2).
  • Brynen, R. (1990). Sanctuary and Survival: The PLO in Lebanon. Westview Press.
  • Committee of Privy Counsellors (2004, July). Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction. United Kingdom House of Lords.
  • Cragin, K. & Daly, S. (2004). The Dynamic Terrorist Threat, An Assessment of Group Motivations and Capabilities in a Changing World. Project Air Force.
  • Crelinsten, R. (2002). Analysing Terrorism and Counter-terrorism: A Communications Model. Terrorism and Political Violence. 14(2).
  • Emerson, S. (1997, August 4). The terrorist infrastructure. Wall Street Journal.
  • Ganor, B. (2002). Defining Terrorism: Is One Man’s Terrorist Another Man’s Freedom Fighter? Police Practice and Research. 3(4).
  • Hookway, J. (2002). Terrorist Bombings Hit Philippines --- Series of Weekend Explosions Kill 10 People, Highlighting Militants' Threat to Region. Wall Street Journal.
  • Hufbauer, G., Schott, J. & Oegg, B. (2005). Policy Brief 01-11: Using Sanctions to Fight Terrorism at [2]
  • Israeli, R. (2002). A Manual of Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 14(4).
  • Israeli, R. (2002). Western Democracies and Islamic Fundamentalist Violence. Terrorism and Political Violence. 12(4).
  • Lenzer, R. & Vardi, N. (2004). Terror Inc.. Forbes.
  • National Commission on Terrorism (2005). Countering the Changing Threat of International Terrorism at [3]
  • Nedoroscik, J. (2002). Extremist Groups in Egypt. Terrorism and Political Violence. 14(2).
  • Perl, R. (2005). Terrorism, The Media, and the Government: Perspectives, Trends, and Options for Policymakers. CRS Issue Brief at [4]
  • Post, J., Sprinzak, E. & Denny, L. (2003). The Terrorist in Their Own Words: Interviews with 35 Incarcerated Middle Eastern Terrorists. Terrorism and Political Violence. 15(1).
  • Sedgwick, M. (2004). Al-Qaeda and the Nature of Religious Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 16(4).
  • Schmidt, A. & Jongman, A. (1988). Political Terrorism. SWIDOC and Transaction Books.
  • Trimble, D. (2004). The Lesson of Northern Ireland. Wall Street Journal.
  • Tucker, D. (2001). Chapter Seven: Combating International Terrorism. The Terrorism
  • Threat and U.S. Government Response: Operational and Organizational Factors. USAF Institute for National Security Studies.
  • Weinberg, L., Pedahzur, A. & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2004). The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 16(4).
  • Wentz, L. (2002). Lessons From Kosovo: The KFOR Experience. CCRP.