Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
(oops)
imported>Russell Potter
Line 15: Line 15:


:Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
:Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
::I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval.  I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing.  Other than that, I think it's fabulous!  [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:59, 3 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Telephone newspaper/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Engineering Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Bruce M.Tindall

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Approval?

Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)