Talk:Taxation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
mNo edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = taxation
|                cat1 = Economics
|                cat2 = Law
|                cat3 = Politics
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:52, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
}}


==Intro==
==Intro==

Revision as of 01:21, 15 November 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The transfer of resources from the community to the government. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Economics, Law and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Intro

"Taxation is the imposition of a transfer of money to the government." This is a poor intro for many reasons (I wrote it), not the least of which is that I can't think of a better term than "money" which seems inaccurate (taxation can exist without money, right?). Anthony 20:19, 21 January 2007 (CST)

History (basically resolved)


I would be inclined to leave the factoid in, flagged here on the Talk page, and remove the source simply because the source is inappropriate; the sourced info might be correct, though. We do, will, and arguably must have all sorts of unsourced claims.

Anyway, though, do as you like; I am writing as contributor here, not as editor. --Larry Sanger 19:46, 21 January 2007 (CST)

  • The place seems to be correct, and the date is fairly close to the beginning of recorded history anyway, so I've mentioned that rather than definitively saying it is the oldest. Anthony 20:09, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Deleted!

I was once told that I must not delete things without prior discussion - there are strict rules against he said. Who do you suppose said that? Nick Gardner 07:25, 14 November 2007 (CST)

I'm not sure, but I think he meant to discuss the edit rather than discussing discussion :-) --Matt Innis (Talk) 07:46, 14 November 2007 (CST)

That's too intellectual for me. I am just a simple soul who has problems with people who lack the courtesy to discuss my drafting before deleting it. Nick Gardner 11:47, 14 November 2007 (CST)