Talk:Space debris: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Carl Jantzen
m (Talk:Space debris moved to Talk:Space debris/Draft: This article hasn't been approved yet)
imported>Carl Jantzen
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
==Sources==
==Sources==
I am beginning a project to go through and verify all of the sources used in this article. One snag I'm reaching is I need to find a copy of Edward Tufte's ''Envisioning Information'' to verify these statements. -- [[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 13:48, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
I am beginning a project to go through and verify all of the sources used in this article. One snag I'm reaching is I need to find a copy of Edward Tufte's ''Envisioning Information'' to verify these statements. -- [[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 13:48, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
I also need to find a source for this statement from Wikipedia: "About 100 tons of fragments generated during approximately 200 such events are still in orbit." I've removed it from the article for now, but it would be a nice fact to include if we can back it up. --[[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 14:31, 27 August 2007 (CDT)


==7/15 Weekly Wiki Responses==
==7/15 Weekly Wiki Responses==

Revision as of 14:31, 27 August 2007

Main Article
Talk Template:Default button 3
Catalogs #
Gallery #
 
Template:Cell style

Sources

I am beginning a project to go through and verify all of the sources used in this article. One snag I'm reaching is I need to find a copy of Edward Tufte's Envisioning Information to verify these statements. -- Carl Jantzen 13:48, 20 August 2007 (CDT)

I also need to find a source for this statement from Wikipedia: "About 100 tons of fragments generated during approximately 200 such events are still in orbit." I've removed it from the article for now, but it would be a nice fact to include if we can back it up. --Carl Jantzen 14:31, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

7/15 Weekly Wiki Responses

Hi Carl, just popped in to say this is quite a good article since you were asking a comment. I don't know much about the subject, but you manage to give a good clear overview of the topic. Informative and concise; a good combination :-) Denis Cavanagh 10:22, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

Space debris looks good, and is an improvement over the Wikipedia article in several places, but the WP article appears to have gained a section about "Significant debris impact events" which is very interesting, since that's exactly the sort of thing people are worried about space debris for. --Larry Sanger 10:37, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

I actually removed that section from this article because I felt that most of the sources were either unreliable or contradicted each other. When I get the chance I'm going to re-review the sources and do some googling to see if there is any real research suggesting those events were debris-related. --Carl Jantzen 10:45, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

Earth Orbit vs Earth's Orbit

I'm think (but I am not an expert!) that earth orbit refers to orbits around the earth, and earth's orbit refers to the orbit in which earth travels around the sun. So I think in the opening paragraph "earth orbit" is actually the correct usage. -- Carl Jantzen 13:49, 15 August 2007 (CDT)