Talk:Physics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Luke Brandt (perhaps perspective for the revised article can be given) |
imported>Fred Salsbury (aims) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Article revision == | == Article revision == | ||
I just checked some of the revisions. I think it would help to understand what is going on as the article develops if a short rationale could be given as revisions are made....otherwise it's difficult to ''see the wood for the trees'' as it were. Thanks--[[User:Luke Brandt|luke]] 02:01, 13 November 2006 (CST) | I just checked some of the revisions. I think it would help to understand what is going on as the article develops if a short rationale could be given as revisions are made....otherwise it's difficult to ''see the wood for the trees'' as it were. Thanks--[[User:Luke Brandt|luke]] 02:01, 13 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:My overall aims have been to | |||
# Improve the readability of the article. | |||
# Remove random bits of information (like some seemingly randomly picked links.) | |||
# remove the slight bias of the article toward astrophysics, particle and field theory (fields that most physicicsts don't work it) | |||
# In several places, the field of physics as structured in an undergraduate curriculum is confused with physics as a discipline. | |||
# Reduce some of the long lists. | |||
:If you look at the [[Biology]] rewrite, they seem to be doing similar work. | |||
[[User:Fred Salsbury|Fred Salsbury]] 07:03, 13 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 08:03, 13 November 2006
Article revision
I just checked some of the revisions. I think it would help to understand what is going on as the article develops if a short rationale could be given as revisions are made....otherwise it's difficult to see the wood for the trees as it were. Thanks--luke 02:01, 13 November 2006 (CST)
- My overall aims have been to
- Improve the readability of the article.
- Remove random bits of information (like some seemingly randomly picked links.)
- remove the slight bias of the article toward astrophysics, particle and field theory (fields that most physicicsts don't work it)
- In several places, the field of physics as structured in an undergraduate curriculum is confused with physics as a discipline.
- Reduce some of the long lists.
- If you look at the Biology rewrite, they seem to be doing similar work.
Fred Salsbury 07:03, 13 November 2006 (CST)