Talk:Mechanics (general): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Lyall Easthope
m (Reply to E. Karpel.)
imported>Peter Lyall Easthope
m (Noted the related articles.)
Line 4: Line 4:
It should be general.  No bias against QM.  Would a list of all extant  
It should be general.  No bias against QM.  Would a list of all extant  
theories of mechanics be appropriate?  <br> Thanks,  ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 14:47, 6 May 2008 (CDT)
theories of mechanics be appropriate?  <br> Thanks,  ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 14:47, 6 May 2008 (CDT)
I've started the related topics subpage.  Classical Mech. and Q.M. are listed there. <br>
Regards, ... [[User:Peter Lyall Easthope|Peter Lyall Easthope]] 21:20, 7 May 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:20, 7 May 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  In physics, all theories explaining the behaviour of matter. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics and Engineering [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  Canadian English

Do you intend for this page to be about just Classical Mechanics or both Classical and Quantum Mechanics? It currently reads as if you intend both. Ethan Karpel 10:37, 5 May 2008 (CDT)

It should be general. No bias against QM. Would a list of all extant theories of mechanics be appropriate?
Thanks, ... Peter Lyall Easthope 14:47, 6 May 2008 (CDT)

I've started the related topics subpage. Classical Mech. and Q.M. are listed there.
Regards, ... Peter Lyall Easthope 21:20, 7 May 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Mechanics_(general)&oldid=459478"