Talk:Korematsu v. United States: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(→‎Related articles: new section)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


These replace earlier articles that were U.S.-centric at the top of the hierarchy.  You'll also find a number of supporting articles, not so much for this one but [[universal jurisdiction]], [[international extradition]], and [[extraordinary rendition]]. I know we need to get something on [[Posse Comitatus Act]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
These replace earlier articles that were U.S.-centric at the top of the hierarchy.  You'll also find a number of supporting articles, not so much for this one but [[universal jurisdiction]], [[international extradition]], and [[extraordinary rendition]]. I know we need to get something on [[Posse Comitatus Act]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
:I did nominate the article for [[CZ:Article of the Week]].[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
==Parent article==
The lead infers [[Japanese interment]], but that's a little vague. What would encompass both the internment and legal issues? Some thoughts:
*[[Extrajudicial detention, U.S., WWII Japanese internment]]
*[[Second World War, U.S., interment of persons of Japanese interment]]
I'm trying to be factual, not editorializing in the title; I'll also be doing an article on the [[442nd Regimental Combat Team]]. There may indeed be links, at the higher hierarchical, to the dynamics of U.S.-Japanese relations, not just combat, but diplomatic issues (e.g., the [[Indochina and the Second World War| embargo after expansion into French Indonesia]] and even vignettes such as [[Guy Gabaldon]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:40, 19 March 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A U.S. Supreme Court case, in which the internment of Japanese-Americans was deemed constitutional due to military necessity [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Law and Military [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Related articles

While I've been focused on more recent aspects and haven't given extensive coverage to the Japanese internment, let me mention a set of evolving new articles that I've posted; I cite this article at the middle level:

There's a parallel hierarchy of:

These replace earlier articles that were U.S.-centric at the top of the hierarchy. You'll also find a number of supporting articles, not so much for this one but universal jurisdiction, international extradition, and extraordinary rendition. I know we need to get something on Posse Comitatus Act. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I did nominate the article for CZ:Article of the Week.Howard C. Berkowitz 22:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Parent article

The lead infers Japanese interment, but that's a little vague. What would encompass both the internment and legal issues? Some thoughts:

I'm trying to be factual, not editorializing in the title; I'll also be doing an article on the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. There may indeed be links, at the higher hierarchical, to the dynamics of U.S.-Japanese relations, not just combat, but diplomatic issues (e.g., the embargo after expansion into French Indonesia and even vignettes such as Guy Gabaldon. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)