Talk:Human uniqueness: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(→‎Article structure: new section)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
Line 4: Line 4:


What I suggest here is to list (possibly on a subpage), for each candidate uniqueness, the following points:
What I suggest here is to list (possibly on a subpage), for each candidate uniqueness, the following points:
#name (e.g. tool use)
#Trait (e.g. tool use)
#definition
#Definition of trait
#pro uniqueness hypothesis (source)
#Taxonomic scope of uniqueness claim
#potential counter examples (source)
#Pro uniqueness hypothesis (source)
#aspects of the definition targeted by counter example, possibly including suggested amendments to definition.
#Potential counter examples (source)
#Aspects of the definition targeted by counter example, possibly including suggested amendments to definition.
Should this go into a table (possibly on a subpage) or list, or how should this be structured?  
Should this go into a table (possibly on a subpage) or list, or how should this be structured?  
[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 06:14, 5 June 2008 (CDT)
[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 06:14, 5 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:16, 5 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A theoretical concept in evolutionary studies, often used in discussions about the evolution of biological traits found in humans. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Biology, Anthropology and Psychology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup categories:  Evolutionary Biology and Evolutionary Psychology
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Article structure

What I suggest here is to list (possibly on a subpage), for each candidate uniqueness, the following points:

  1. Trait (e.g. tool use)
  2. Definition of trait
  3. Taxonomic scope of uniqueness claim
  4. Pro uniqueness hypothesis (source)
  5. Potential counter examples (source)
  6. Aspects of the definition targeted by counter example, possibly including suggested amendments to definition.

Should this go into a table (possibly on a subpage) or list, or how should this be structured? Daniel Mietchen 06:14, 5 June 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Human_uniqueness&oldid=488182"