Talk:House of Lords: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→a clunky phrase: new section) |
imported>Peter Jackson |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
"90 "elected hereditary peers", who have been elected by and from members who had been granted or inherited hereditary peerages granted by monarchs down the ages" really needs to be rewritten. It does, I guess, actually mean something, but it is not very gracefully stated. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 15:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) | "90 "elected hereditary peers", who have been elected by and from members who had been granted or inherited hereditary peerages granted by monarchs down the ages" really needs to be rewritten. It does, I guess, actually mean something, but it is not very gracefully stated. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 15:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:That's probably because I tried to keep as much as possible of what was already there when I rewrote it. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:37, 16 February 2012
Law Lords -- a hard phrase to get my tongue around!
I see that they have been moved to a new Supreme Court -- 'Merca comes to Blighty! Hayford Peirce 17:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
update
I have updated and simplified this long-neglected article. Comments? Nick Gardner 14:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
a clunky phrase
"90 "elected hereditary peers", who have been elected by and from members who had been granted or inherited hereditary peerages granted by monarchs down the ages" really needs to be rewritten. It does, I guess, actually mean something, but it is not very gracefully stated. Hayford Peirce 15:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's probably because I tried to keep as much as possible of what was already there when I rewrote it. Peter Jackson 16:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)