Talk:Hobby: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati No edit summary |
imported>Peter J. King (general comments) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Come on everybody, pitch in here, please. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 16:32, 29 January 2007 (CST) | Come on everybody, pitch in here, please. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 16:32, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
==This article== | |||
The problem here is that it's difficult to see what more can be said; it's really only capable of being one of three things: a compendium covering all the (main) hobbies, a dictionary definition, or a portal page. The first is practically impossible (and undesirable), the second is possible, but the third is both possible and useful. | |||
I'm not sure what this was meant to say: "Often a hobby is seen as compensation of gainful employment". --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:05, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | Also,I'm not sure what this was meant to say: "Often a hobby is seen as compensation of gainful employment". --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:05, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
I deleted it, as an expedient manuever. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 16:06, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | :I deleted it, as an expedient manuever. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 16:06, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Wow, you're on the ball. I came back to add more comment, and hit an edit conflict (did you get my e-mail, by the way?). --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:09, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, 3 April 2007
Come on everybody, pitch in here, please. Nancy Sculerati MD 16:32, 29 January 2007 (CST)
This article
The problem here is that it's difficult to see what more can be said; it's really only capable of being one of three things: a compendium covering all the (main) hobbies, a dictionary definition, or a portal page. The first is practically impossible (and undesirable), the second is possible, but the third is both possible and useful.
Also,I'm not sure what this was meant to say: "Often a hobby is seen as compensation of gainful employment". --Peter J. King Talk 16:05, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
- I deleted it, as an expedient manuever. Nancy Sculerati 16:06, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
- Wow, you're on the ball. I came back to add more comment, and hit an edit conflict (did you get my e-mail, by the way?). --Peter J. King Talk 16:09, 3 April 2007 (CDT)