Talk:Fractal: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Halicz
(article to be rewriten)
 
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I believe that the article should be virtually blanked and rewriten (as of today it's imoprted wikipedia). Only the lead is acceptable. The rest is quite chaotic, superfluous, shallow and somehow arbitrary (as compared to an introductory university course, say). Of course, there are many interesting elements to be re-used, but the global structure shoud be reworked. I hope I will be able propose something better soon. Actually, any remarks/propositions are welcome. Just to let you know my tohughts (and plans!). [[User:Aleksander Halicz|Aleksander Halicz]] 07:24, 24 January 2007 (CST)
I believe that the article should be virtually blanked and rewriten (as of today it's imoprted wikipedia). Only the lead is acceptable. The rest is quite chaotic, superfluous, shallow and somehow arbitrary (as compared to an introductory university course, say). Of course, there are many interesting elements to be re-used, but the global structure shoud be reworked. I hope I will be able propose something better soon. Actually, any remarks/propositions are welcome. Just to let you know my tohughts (and plans!). [[User:Aleksander Halicz|Aleksander Halicz]] 07:24, 24 January 2007 (CST)
:Go for it!![[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 07:59, 24 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 08:59, 24 January 2007

I believe that the article should be virtually blanked and rewriten (as of today it's imoprted wikipedia). Only the lead is acceptable. The rest is quite chaotic, superfluous, shallow and somehow arbitrary (as compared to an introductory university course, say). Of course, there are many interesting elements to be re-used, but the global structure shoud be reworked. I hope I will be able propose something better soon. Actually, any remarks/propositions are welcome. Just to let you know my tohughts (and plans!). Aleksander Halicz 07:24, 24 January 2007 (CST)

Go for it!!Gareth Leng 07:59, 24 January 2007 (CST)