Talk:Destroyer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
:::These are really great pictures. The article looks so much better now. Thank you. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 21:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC))
:::These are really great pictures. The article looks so much better now. Thank you. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 21:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC))


::::Do you know if the KDX are also built on the Burke hull like the Kongos, so there's no reason to have separate pictures because they look alike?  
::::Do you know if the KDX are also built on the Ticonderoga/Spruance/Burke hull like the Kongos, so there's no reason to have separate pictures because they look alike?  
 
::::[[Cruiser]] may be even more fun because the naming is so confused; the U.S. Navy had a period of temporary insanity. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


== Any image sources for non-US ships, especially historical? ==
== Any image sources for non-US ships, especially historical? ==

Revision as of 16:22, 6 July 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Military and Engineering [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Technology
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


This article intertwines with cruiser and frigate. I haven't yet decided if there's a reasonable single "fast attack craft" to include classic torpedo and motor gunboats, as well as missile boats. I'm also not sure, given the confusion in the three main vessel names, whether there needs to be an additional category that would include such things as oceangoing corvettes (e.g., Israeli Sa'ar), the latest incarnation of the Littoral Combat Ship, etc.

Indeed, I have not yet started frigate. Expect much back-and-forth among cruiser, destroyer, and frigate even in the early drafts. Howard C. Berkowitz 12:06, 19 July 2008 (CDT)

This is very fun to read & well written. I read half of it. (Chunbum Park 21:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC))
Cruiser actually approaches comedy, when the U.S. Navy seemed to lose its mind about what to call things.
I will get current Korean ships listed! Howard C. Berkowitz 21:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Sure. S. Korea has an Aegis class of destroyers named after King Sejong (he has posthumorous title "the great," & only 4 Korean kings in history were given such title), KDX-III. The only ones worthy of notice should be the KDX-I class, II class, & III class. (Chunbum Park 20:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC))
These are really great pictures. The article looks so much better now. Thank you. (Chunbum Park 21:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC))
Do you know if the KDX are also built on the Ticonderoga/Spruance/Burke hull like the Kongos, so there's no reason to have separate pictures because they look alike?
Cruiser may be even more fun because the naming is so confused; the U.S. Navy had a period of temporary insanity. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Any image sources for non-US ships, especially historical?

I can cheat with the current Japanese Kongo-class, as they are Burke-class copies. Howard C. Berkowitz 00:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Let's not forget the most famous destroyer of them all....

Have you heard of a ship called the good Reuben James

Manned by hard fighting men both of honor and fame?

She flew the Stars and Stripes of the land of the free

But tonight she's in her grave at the bottom of the sea.