Talk:Deepak Chopra: Difference between revisions
(My bad: my bad grammar. correcting it) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==Introduction and reason for this article being here== | ==Introduction and reason for this article being here== | ||
Whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that this man isn't a force of nature, and has changed American medicine and healing. He definitely is worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Hopefully, that entry will give his whole life a fair hearing and not try to present one viewpoint over another. I feel that the Wikipedia article in 2023 about Dr. Chopra is biased and heavily pushing a scientific reductionist view. This is particularly a problem with dealing with this healer and physician originally from India, who has a long history of infusing spirituality into physical healing, and integrating empirical, medical knowledge with that of spiritual realization...an article on such an individual should not be a purely skeptical science hack job on a doctor that dares to speaks of things beyond mechanistic pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. I have | Whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that this man isn't a force of nature, and has changed American medicine and healing. He definitely is worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Hopefully, that entry will give his whole life a fair hearing and not try to present one viewpoint over another. I feel that the Wikipedia article in 2023 about Dr. Chopra is biased and heavily pushing a scientific reductionist view. This is particularly a problem with dealing with this healer and physician originally from India, who has a long history of infusing spirituality into physical healing, and integrating empirical, medical knowledge with that of spiritual realization...an article on such an individual should not be a purely skeptical science hack job on a doctor that dares to speaks of things beyond mechanistic pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. I have heavily edited the original article. [[User:Jack S. Byrom|Jack S. Byrom]] ([[User talk:Jack S. Byrom|talk]]) 22:23, 13 March 2023 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:37, 14 March 2023
Introduction and reason for this article being here
Whether you love him or hate him, you can't argue that this man isn't a force of nature, and has changed American medicine and healing. He definitely is worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Hopefully, that entry will give his whole life a fair hearing and not try to present one viewpoint over another. I feel that the Wikipedia article in 2023 about Dr. Chopra is biased and heavily pushing a scientific reductionist view. This is particularly a problem with dealing with this healer and physician originally from India, who has a long history of infusing spirituality into physical healing, and integrating empirical, medical knowledge with that of spiritual realization...an article on such an individual should not be a purely skeptical science hack job on a doctor that dares to speaks of things beyond mechanistic pharmaceuticals and biochemistry. I have heavily edited the original article. Jack S. Byrom (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2023 (CDT)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Food Science Developing Articles
- Food Science Nonstub Articles
- Food Science Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Developing Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles