Talk:Contraception (veterinary)

From Citizendium
Revision as of 01:34, 10 May 2007 by imported>Nancy Sculerati (→‎References - with notes)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References - with notes

Fayrer-Hosken, R. A., Grobler, D., Van Altena, J. J., Bertschinger, H. J. & Kirkpatrick, J. F. Nature 407, 149 (2000). "Immunocontraceptive vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies that prevent fertilization, without the side effects of hormonal contraceptives. The vaccine antigens are the proteins of the zona pellucida, the clear protein coat surrounding mammalian eggs. The surface structures of the elephant zona pellucida are very similar to those of the pig zona pellucida (pZP)"..."Female zoo elephants vaccinated with pZP and an adjuvant all developed antibodies that persisted for 12-14 months 1,2, at a level equivalent to those found in horses given immunocontraception." Field method:"Elephants were located from a helicopter, and females to be anaesthetized (by aerial darting) were identified as non-pregnant by the presence of a calf smaller than 1 metre high. We then used ultrasound scans to confirm that females were not pregnant, and all nonpregnant animals were bled to obtain prevaccination serum samples. Twenty-one elephants were given an initial vaccination of pZP with adjuvant; 20 controls received a placebo."..."Of the ten elephants, two (20%) were pregnant after 10 months. This was significantly ([chi]2, P=0.001) lower than the conception rate of the control elephants (89%, 16/18) and initial immunocontraception rates (44%, 8/18)."

Pimm SL. van Aarde RJ. African elephants and contraception. Nature. 411(6839):766, 2001 Jun 14. UI: 11459047 (my summary) When African elephants are protected but confined in a relatively limited land mass, there can be doubling of the population in 10 years- with destruction of the habitat. To preserve that habitat, animals are often culled, and this letter discusses an article in which a vaccination strategy was used to effect contraception instead of allowing the population to increase. Criticisms of the article include the opinion that the control group's cow pregnancy rate semed unrealistically high (89% within a year), and that -by contrast- exagerated the effectiveness of immunocontraception.Their data:"Data from 813 adult cows culled in Kruger National Park between 1979 and 1994 showed that 51% (range, 36-77%) were pregnant." Criticism of cost also made.

Fayrer-Hosken RA. Grobler D. Van Altena JJ. Bertschinger HJ. Kirkpatrick JF. Immunocontraception of African elephants.[see comment]. [Journal Article] Nature. 407(6801):149, 2000 Sep 14. UI: 11001042

Gould KG. Johnson-Ward J. Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraception in the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). [Journal Article. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.] Journal of Medical Primatology. 29(2):63-9, 2000 Apr. UI: 10950453

Mohle U. Heistermann M. Einspanier A. Hodges JK. Efficacy and effects of short- and medium-term contraception in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) using melengestrol acetate implants. [Journal Article] Journal of Medical Primatology. 28(1):36-47, 1999 Feb. UI: 10372539