Talk:Chemical warfare in World War I: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(illustrating history)
imported>David E. Volk
(subpages- strange title for this article; chemical weapons better?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
==Image talk==
==Image talk==


Line 5: Line 7:
:There are good number of actual photographs available for this at the Imperial War Museum. Some are wrenching.  —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 01:19, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
:There are good number of actual photographs available for this at the Imperial War Museum. Some are wrenching.  —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 01:19, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
::the photos were not published at the time and did not make an impact. The painting was very widely viewed and did make an impact.  It's what's inside people's minds that matters for historians. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 08:02, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
::the photos were not published at the time and did not make an impact. The painting was very widely viewed and did make an impact.  It's what's inside people's minds that matters for historians. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 08:02, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
== Strange heading for this article ==
This page is titled very strangely, and might be better used as a section in a page called '''chemical weapons'' or biological warfare, etc.  Separate pages for phosgene and mustard gas need to be made as well.  I can help make the
chemical drawings.  [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 13:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 14:27, 19 December 2007


Image talk

Do the world of re-users a favor and give files a descriptive file name so they can be found easily with MediaWiki's search engine. I re-upload the image and it is at Image:WWI - Gassed - John Singer Sargent.jpg.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 20:34, 20 September 2007 (CDT)

There are good number of actual photographs available for this at the Imperial War Museum. Some are wrenching.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:19, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
the photos were not published at the time and did not make an impact. The painting was very widely viewed and did make an impact. It's what's inside people's minds that matters for historians. Richard Jensen 08:02, 22 September 2007 (CDT)

Strange heading for this article

This page is titled very strangely, and might be better used as a section in a page called 'chemical weapons or biological warfare, etc. Separate pages for phosgene and mustard gas need to be made as well. I can help make the chemical drawings. David E. Volk 13:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)