Talk:Bicameral legislature: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Since you are actually discussing [[bicameral legislature]]s, isn't that where this article should live? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:06, 7 March 2007 (CST)
Since you are actually discussing [[bicameral legislature]]s, isn't that where this article should live? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:06, 7 March 2007 (CST)


Line 4: Line 6:


"Bicameral" is an adjective, not a noun, right?  If so, then since you are not describing the mere quality of bicamerality, but bicameral legislatures (you give several examples), I think the article is better placed under the noun.  Unless we can speak of "a bicameral."  ? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:26, 8 March 2007 (CST)
"Bicameral" is an adjective, not a noun, right?  If so, then since you are not describing the mere quality of bicamerality, but bicameral legislatures (you give several examples), I think the article is better placed under the noun.  Unless we can speak of "a bicameral."  ? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:26, 8 March 2007 (CST)
Point taken.  I will do a move, then.  Would a redirect on the word by itself be useful, too?  I think so, but I don't want to conflict with any developed/developing standards or policies.  Thanks!  (Edit: OK, I was expecting there to be a Move button or link somewhere - I just did something similar on a Wiki at work, so I thought I knew how to do it ... but I don't see that.)[[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 22:44, 8 March 2007 (CST)
I see that you or someone else changed the article title - thanks.  I've updated the pages that pointed to the old name. --[[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 08:23, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 07:08, 25 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A legislature divided into two deliberative bodies. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics and Law [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Since you are actually discussing bicameral legislatures, isn't that where this article should live? --Larry Sanger 22:06, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Well, the definition of "bicameral" is a legislature with two houses, so "bicameral legislature" is actually redundant... but I have no objection to moving this to "Bicameral legislature" if it fits better into the grand scheme, and then making "bicameral" redirect to the new article. --steve802 13:19, 8 March 2007 (CST)

"Bicameral" is an adjective, not a noun, right? If so, then since you are not describing the mere quality of bicamerality, but bicameral legislatures (you give several examples), I think the article is better placed under the noun. Unless we can speak of "a bicameral."  ? --Larry Sanger 19:26, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Point taken. I will do a move, then. Would a redirect on the word by itself be useful, too? I think so, but I don't want to conflict with any developed/developing standards or policies. Thanks! (Edit: OK, I was expecting there to be a Move button or link somewhere - I just did something similar on a Wiki at work, so I thought I knew how to do it ... but I don't see that.)steve802 22:44, 8 March 2007 (CST)

I see that you or someone else changed the article title - thanks. I've updated the pages that pointed to the old name. --steve802 08:23, 9 March 2007 (CST)