Talk:Battle of Britain: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→second paragraph: needs extensive work -- otherwise it's meaningless) |
imported>Tom Kelly (→any pictures?: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== second paragraph == | == second paragraph == | ||
The second paragraph comes from out of the blue, doesn't relate to the first paragraph at all, and, unless, the reader already knows a lot about the Battle of Britain, is essentially meaningless. For instance: "the fighters" -- what fighters? what were they doing? why? "the radars" -- what radars? etc. etc. I hesitate to simply delete the whole paragraph, but it should either be greatly expanded, greatly rewritten, or moved somewhere else. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 00:16, 17 June 2008 (CDT) | The second paragraph comes from out of the blue, doesn't relate to the first paragraph at all, and, unless, the reader already knows a lot about the Battle of Britain, is essentially meaningless. For instance: "the fighters" -- what fighters? what were they doing? why? "the radars" -- what radars? etc. etc. I hesitate to simply delete the whole paragraph, but it should either be greatly expanded, greatly rewritten, or moved somewhere else. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 00:16, 17 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
== any pictures? == | |||
any pictures that could go in this article? [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 12:31, 20 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:31, 20 September 2008
second paragraph
The second paragraph comes from out of the blue, doesn't relate to the first paragraph at all, and, unless, the reader already knows a lot about the Battle of Britain, is essentially meaningless. For instance: "the fighters" -- what fighters? what were they doing? why? "the radars" -- what radars? etc. etc. I hesitate to simply delete the whole paragraph, but it should either be greatly expanded, greatly rewritten, or moved somewhere else. Hayford Peirce 00:16, 17 June 2008 (CDT)
any pictures?
any pictures that could go in this article? Tom Kelly 12:31, 20 September 2008 (CDT)