Skepticism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(If you want to write a Draft article that other people won't edit, you should do it in what we call a Sandbox -- please ask how to create one)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(Everything that I deleted is simply your own point of view. We have considerably more leeway here than at Wikipedia, but even so we simply can't write essays and call them articles)
Line 1: Line 1:
Skepticism is a philosophical point of view. A skeptic is one who is expressing skepticism. A common phrase is "healthy skepticism." By that, it is intended that a person does not accept all or part of a premise without further inquiry. The assumption is that the skeptical person will make the effort to become informed about the subject before deciding to accept or reject the idea.
'''Skepticism''' is a philosophical point of view and a skeptic is one who is expressing skepticism.
 
Healthy skepticism becomes an obstacle to learning when a person rejects an ideas without becoming informed because it contradicts accepted wisdom. While skepticism is an important component in any quest for knowledge, a more useful point of view is discernment.


===Introduction===
===Introduction===

Revision as of 14:14, 17 January 2014

Skepticism is a philosophical point of view and a skeptic is one who is expressing skepticism.

Introduction

Replace this text when text for the article is added Make sure there is enough background information here so that the reader can have a sense of what the subject is about. A brief history will be provided next, so this is mostly "what it is." The introduction would be an expansion of the abstract but containing references for important points.

History

The two major schools of skepticism in Greek philosophy are the Academic and the Pyrrhonian.[1]

  • Academic: Named after Plato's Academy, the The philosophy that nothing can be known for certain
  • Pyrrhonian: Named after the Greek, Pyrrho of Elis (c. 360-275 B.C), it is the point of view of suspended judgement. The Greek, Aenesidemus (c. 100-40 B.C.), formulated it into a philosophy and adopted the title of "skeptic" (from skeptikos, meaning "inquirer") and "doubters"; (from ephektikos, meaning "one who suspends judgment")[1]

Scope

Replace this text when text for the article is added What is involved in the subject? For instance, if this is about an organization, what is the primary focus of the organization? Does it include peer-review? Is there a publication for non-technical members?

General

Types of skepticism organized skepticism


Modern skepticism

There needs to be an emphasis on skeptical objections about subjects that are not specifically addressed by mainstream science.

End notes

Replace this text when text for the article is added This is not a list of references (us them below). This is a place to include substantiating evidence not identified by the references. It is also a good place to include a bibliography.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Smith name, George H.. "A Note on the History and Meaning of Skepticism", Resources for Independent Thinking, http://www.rit.org/essays/history.php.

,