Research peer review: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
(New page: {{subpages}} '''Research peer review''' is the "evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is use...)
 
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
m (Insignificant change to force appearance in appropriate category lists)
Line 3: Line 3:


Recently, blog-based peer-review has been tested, yielding mixed results.<ref name="titleExperimental Use of Blog-Based Peer Review Gives Mixed Results - Chronicle.com">{{cite web |url=http://chronicle.com/free/2008/04/2332n.htm |title=Experimental Use of Blog-Based Peer Review Gives Mixed Results |accessdate=2008-04-15 |author=Young JR |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=2008-04-02 |format= |work= |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education |pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote=}}</ref>
Recently, blog-based peer-review has been tested, yielding mixed results.<ref name="titleExperimental Use of Blog-Based Peer Review Gives Mixed Results - Chronicle.com">{{cite web |url=http://chronicle.com/free/2008/04/2332n.htm |title=Experimental Use of Blog-Based Peer Review Gives Mixed Results |accessdate=2008-04-15 |author=Young JR |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=2008-04-02 |format= |work= |publisher=The Chronicle of Higher Education |pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote=}}</ref>
 
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 17:18, 7 May 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Audio [?]
Video [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Research peer review is the "evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions."[1]

Recently, blog-based peer-review has been tested, yielding mixed results.[2]

References

  1. Anonymous (2024), Research peer review (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  2. Young JR (2008-04-02). Experimental Use of Blog-Based Peer Review Gives Mixed Results. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved on 2008-04-15.