Public goods: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 22: Line 22:


==Rival interpretations==
==Rival interpretations==
The concept is often interpreted  to mean  that non-rivalous and non-excludable products and services can only supplied by governments. That interpretation was challenged by Ronald Coase, who pointed out that English lighthouses had been privately supplied and financed in the 19th century<ref> Ronald Coase 1974. ''The Lighthouse in Economics'', Journal of Law and Economics, 17, no. 2, 1974</ref>. The broader interpretation adopted in this article follows Samuelson in  stipulating  only that they cannot be paid for by individual users  - implying that, unlike private goods, their supply cannot respond to the normal action of market forces. But it does not exclude  the possibility that they could be collectively financed by groups of individuals. The possibility of disruption by free-riders has often assumed to limit the scope for collective action but Elinor Ostrom has demonstrated ways in which that obstacle can be overcome<ref>[http://www.apsanet.org/media/PDFs/PresidentialAddresses/1997AddrOSTROM.pdf Elinor Ostrom: ''A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action'', Presidential Address to the American Political Science Association, 1997, American Political Science Association, Vol 92, No 1, 1998]</ref>. There are, in fact a variety of products and services that satisfy the public goods criteria but are privately financed. Citizendium, for example,  is non-rivalous and is constitutionally non-excludable,  and  is thus a public good that is not government, but is collectively financed by its supporters.
The concept is often interpreted  to mean  that non-rivalous and non-excludable products and services can only supplied by governments. That interpretation was challenged by Ronald Coase, who pointed out that English lighthouses had been privately supplied and financed in the 19th century<ref> Ronald Coase 1974. ''The Lighthouse in Economics'', Journal of Law and Economics, 17, no. 2, 1974</ref>. The broader interpretation adopted in this article follows Samuelson in  stipulating  only that they cannot be paid for by individual users  - implying that, unlike private goods, their supply cannot respond to the normal action of market forces. But it does not exclude  the possibility that they could be collectively financed by groups of individuals. The possibility of disruption by free-riders has often assumed to limit the scope for collective action but Elinor Ostrom has demonstrated ways in which that obstacle can be overcome<ref>[http://www.apsanet.org/media/PDFs/PresidentialAddresses/1997AddrOSTROM.pdf Elinor Ostrom: ''A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action'', Presidential Address to the American Political Science Association, 1997, American Political Science Association, Vol 92, No 1, 1998]</ref>. There are, in fact a variety of products and services that satisfy the public goods criteria but are privately financed. Citizendium, for example,  is non-rivalous and is constitutionally non-excludable,  and  is thus a public good that is not government-financed , but is paid for by its supporters.


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 17:25, 27 October 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

Public goods are products and services, such as lighthouses and national defence, that can only be collectively financed because it is not feasible to require each user to pay for their use.

The origins of the concept

In the 18th century, Adam Smith wrote:

"The third and last duty of the sovereign or commonwealth is that of erecting or maintaining those public institutions and those public works, which, although they may be in the highest degree advantageous to a great society, are, however, of such a nature, that the profit could not repay the expense to any individual or small number of individuals, and which it therefore cannot be expected that any individual or small number of individuals should erect or maintain ."[1];

- in the 19th century, John Stuart Mill elaborated the idea, arguing as an example that it would be impossible to charge seamen according to their use of lighthouses

it is a proper office of government to build and maintain lighthouses, establish buoys, &c. for the security of navigation: for since it is impossible that the ships at sea which are benefited by a lighthouse, should be made to pay a toll on the occasion of its use, no one would build lighthouses from motives of personal interest, unless indemnified and rewarded from a compulsory levy made by the state. [2];

- and in the 20th century, Paul Samuelson (who at first referred to public goods as "collective consumption goods") derived a formal proof of the proposition that "no decentralized pricing system can serve to determine optimally the levels of collective consumption" [3]

Defining characteristics

Pure public goods are held to be:

  • non-rivalous, meaning that anyone can benefit from them without diminishing their benefits to other people;
  • non-excludable, meaning that no-one can be prevented from benefiting from them;

- and they are often:

  • non-rejectable, meaning that nobody can avoid benefiting from them.

The term "club goods" is applied to products and services that are non-rivalous, but from which "non-members" are excluded.

The term "collective goods" is sometimes used to denote the broader category of products and services, including both private goods and public goods, that are collectively financed.

Rival interpretations

The concept is often interpreted to mean that non-rivalous and non-excludable products and services can only supplied by governments. That interpretation was challenged by Ronald Coase, who pointed out that English lighthouses had been privately supplied and financed in the 19th century[4]. The broader interpretation adopted in this article follows Samuelson in stipulating only that they cannot be paid for by individual users - implying that, unlike private goods, their supply cannot respond to the normal action of market forces. But it does not exclude the possibility that they could be collectively financed by groups of individuals. The possibility of disruption by free-riders has often assumed to limit the scope for collective action but Elinor Ostrom has demonstrated ways in which that obstacle can be overcome[5]. There are, in fact a variety of products and services that satisfy the public goods criteria but are privately financed. Citizendium, for example, is non-rivalous and is constitutionally non-excludable, and is thus a public good that is not government-financed , but is paid for by its supporters.

References