Larkin Reynolds

From Citizendium
Revision as of 16:21, 1 April 2022 by George Swan (talk | contribs) (first draft)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
Larkin Reynolds
Occupation lawyer

Larkin Reynolds is an American lawyer and counter-terrorism specialist.[1][2] Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.[3] While a student Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale.

Education

Education[2]
year degree institution details
2004 B.A. New York University International Relations
2010 J.D. Harvard Law School Law degree

References

  1. {{cite news | url = http://www.lawfareblog.com/author/larkin/ | title = Posts by Larkin Reynolds | work = [[Lawfare] | author = | date = | page = | location = | isbn = | language = | trans-title = | archiveurl = | archivedate = | accessdate = 2012-07-16 | url-status = live | quote = }}
  2. 2.0 2.1 Larkin Reynolds: Associate. Wilmer Hale. Retrieved on 2012-07-17.
  3. A Terrorism Expert Turns Her Gaze Inward". The Chronicle Review. 2010-06-20. https://chronicle.com/article/A-Terrorism-Expert-Turns-Her/65989/. Retrieved, The Chronicle Review, 2010-06-20. Retrieved on 2012-07-16. “During an informal class session held at her home, Stern told the students about her latest work and about what led her to pursue it. Her students say Stern's "intellectual honesty," as one of them, Larkin Reynolds, put it, allowed them to have deeper discussions and to take scholarly risks, arguing over such potentially incendiary ideas as the morality of torture.”