Iraq War: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Michel van der Hoek
No edit summary
imported>Michel van der Hoek
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
On February 16, 2001 a number of US and UK warplanes attacked Baghdad, nearly two years before the declaration of war. <ref>http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/02/16/iraq.airstrike/ CNN reports</ref>.
On February 16, 2001 a number of US and UK warplanes attacked Baghdad, nearly two years before the declaration of war. <ref>http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/02/16/iraq.airstrike/ CNN reports</ref>.


===Aftermath of 9/11 Attacks===
===Iraq and the War on Terror ===
The attacks of September 11, 2001 shaped the policies of the Bush administration towards Iraq. President Bush saw them as confirmation of his beliefs that the international community’s failure to enforce compliance with UN resolution and America’s irresolute foreign policy had emboldened rogue states and international terrorist groups. Combined with his isolationist foreign policy beliefs, President Bush started to formulate what has become known as the [[Bush Doctrine]]. The doctrine is most fully expressed in the administration’s ''National Security Strategy of the United States of America'', published in September 2002. In it, the president states:
The attacks of September 11, 2001 shaped the policies of the Bush administration towards Iraq. President Bush saw them as confirmation of his beliefs that the international community’s failure to enforce compliance with UN resolution and America’s irresolute foreign policy had emboldened rogue states and international terrorist groups. Combined with his isolationist foreign policy beliefs, President Bush started to formulate what has become known as the [[Bush Doctrine]]. The doctrine is most fully expressed in the administration’s ''National Security Strategy of the United States of America'', published in September 2002. In it, the President states:


<blockquote>
{{cquote|
We will disrupt and destroy terrorist organizations by (…) direct and continuous action using all the elements of national and international power. Our immediate focus will be those terrorist organizations of global reach and any terrorist or state sponsor of terrorism which attempts to gain or use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or their precursors.<ref>[http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss3.html ''National Security Strategy of the United States of America''] The White House, September 2002. (Page 6 in the printed edition). Retrieved May 8, 2008.</ref>
We will disrupt and destroy terrorist organizations by (…) direct and continuous action using all the elements of national and international power. Our immediate focus will be those terrorist organizations of global reach and any terrorist or state sponsor of terrorism which attempts to gain or use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or their precursors.<ref>[http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss3.html ''National Security Strategy of the United States of America''], The White House, September 2002. (Page 6 in the printed edition). Retrieved May 8, 2008.</ref><blockquote>}}
</blockquote>
 
The administration included Iraq in a series of states it considered acutely dangerous to world peace. In his 2002 [[State of the Union]], President Bush called Iraq, together with [[Iran]] and [[North Korea]] part of an “axis of evil”.<ref>[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html 2002 State of the Union address], President George W. Bush, January 29, 2002. Retrieved May 8, 2008.</ref> In this address the president also claimed the right to wage a preventative war. Early in 2002, the administration began pressuring Iraq as well as the international community on greater compliance by Iraq with UN resolutions.
 
As a result of intelligence received in October 2001, the [[CIA]] sent former Ambassador [[Joseph Wilson IV]] to [[Niger]] in February 2002 to investigate the claim that Iraq was attempting to buy [[uranium]] to revamp its nuclear WMD program. Wilson interviewed several high-ranking Nigerian government officials. He found no evidence for the sale and concluded that the claim was “unequivocally wrong”.<ref>[http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/congress/2004_rpt/iraq-wmd-intell_chapter2-b.htm REPORT ON THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S PREWAR INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS ON IRAQ] United States Senate, ordered July 7, 2004. Retrieved May 8, 2008.</ref> However, Mr. Wilson’s report was not passed on to higher ranking officials in the CIA and the White House was only informed of it much later.


----
----

Revision as of 15:51, 8 May 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Iraq War was the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the so-named Coalition of the Willing, a multinational task force led by the United States of America. The multinational force included strong support from a majority of NATO counties and, especially, the Great Britain and Australia. The UN neither approved nor censured the war, which was never a formally declared war. The Iraq War is also known as Operation Iraqi Liberation and then Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The war had quick result of the removal (and later execution) of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and the formation of a democratically elected parliament and ratified constitution, which won UN approval. However, an amorphous insurgency or civil war, based on religious factions, since then has produced large numbers of civilian deaths and an unstable Iraqi government. It has generated enormous political controversy in the U.S. and other countries.

The main rationale for the invasion was Iraq’s continued violation of the 1991 agreement (in particular United Nations Resolution 687) that the country allow UN weapons inspectors unhindered access to nuclear facilities, as well as the country’s failure to observe several UN resolutions ordering Iraq to comply with Resolution 687. The US government cited intelligence reports that Iraq was actively supporting terrorists and developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) as additional and acute reasons to invade. Though there was some justification before October 2002 for believing this intelligence credible, a later Senate investigation found that the intelligence was inaccurate and that the intelligence community failed to communicate this properly to the Bush administration[1].

Factors Leading Up to the Invasion

Weapons Inspections

After the Gulf War in 1991, United Nations Resolution 687 specified that Iraq must destroy all weapons of mass destruction (WMD). A large amount of WMDs were indeed destroyed under UN supervision (UNSCOM). Two no-fly zones were also instituted in northern and southern Iraq where Iraqi military aircraft were prohibited from flying. The United States and the United Kingdom (and France until 1998) patrolled these zones.

However, by late 1997 the the Clinton administration became dissatisfied with Iraq’s increased unwillingness to cooperate with UNSCOM inspectors. In January 1998, a number of American neoconservative military experts wrote a letter to President Bill Clinton, in an effort to convince the president that the policy of containment was not working and that there was a real possibility Iraq would reconstitute its WMD arsenal. The group urged the president to invade Iraq in order to remove Saddam Hussein from power.[2] As a result of widespread expectations that the Clinton administration would decide to act with military force, the UN weapons inspectors were evacuated from the country. Iraq and the United Nations agreed to resume weapons inspections, but Saddam Hussein continued to obstruct UNSCOM teams throughout the remainder of 1998.

In December 1998, President Clinton authorized military action against Iraq and from December 16 to 19 1998, US and UK aircraft bombed military and government targets in Iraq in Operation Desert Fox. It was widely understood that the Clinton administration intended Operation Desert Fox to be not merely a campaign of punishment for Iraq’s failure to cooperate but also to weaken the regime in advance of orchestrated efforts to cause regime change. In that respect, Clinton administration policy was ineffective

As a result of Iraq’s barring inspectors from the country, UNSCOM inspections of Iraq’s WMD effectively came to an end and in March 1999, the UN concluded that the UNSCOM mandate should end. In December 1999, the UN passed UN Security Council Resolution 1284, setting up UNMOVIC (United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission), headed by Swedish diplomat Hans Blix, which was to identify the remaining WMD arsenals in Iraq. Because UNMOVIC was banned from Iraq, the world had to rely on indirect evidence, most of which turned out to be false or inaccurate.[3] Iraq policy during the remainder of the Clinton presidency was marked by a return to the containment regime that existed before Operation Desert Fox, but now without the benefit of direct intelligence.

Bush Administration Policy before 9/11

In the early days of the Bush administration, President George W. Bush expressed dissatisfaction with his predecessor’s foreign policy, in particular with regard to Iraq, which he considered weak and half-hearted. Interestingly, the main thrust of Bush criticism was that President Clinton had been too widely engaged in too many conflicts, acting as the “world’s policeman.” In the end, President Bush believed Clinton had lacked the necessary resolve to hold Saddam Hussein accountable for his failure to comply with UN resolutions. Bush also questioned America’s membership in NATO and involvement in UN diplomacy, which led some to believe he was moving towards a more isolationist view of foreign policy.[4]

At the same time, Bush continued to favor executing the policy President Clinton had approved but not acted on: to actively proceed to effect regime change in Iraq. In January 2002, Time Magazine reported that since President Bush took office he had been grumbling about finishing the job his father started. [5]

On February 16, 2001 a number of US and UK warplanes attacked Baghdad, nearly two years before the declaration of war. [6].

Iraq and the War on Terror

The attacks of September 11, 2001 shaped the policies of the Bush administration towards Iraq. President Bush saw them as confirmation of his beliefs that the international community’s failure to enforce compliance with UN resolution and America’s irresolute foreign policy had emboldened rogue states and international terrorist groups. Combined with his isolationist foreign policy beliefs, President Bush started to formulate what has become known as the Bush Doctrine. The doctrine is most fully expressed in the administration’s National Security Strategy of the United States of America, published in September 2002. In it, the President states:

We will disrupt and destroy terrorist organizations by (…) direct and continuous action using all the elements of national and international power. Our immediate focus will be those terrorist organizations of global reach and any terrorist or state sponsor of terrorism which attempts to gain or use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or their precursors.[7]

The administration included Iraq in a series of states it considered acutely dangerous to world peace. In his 2002 State of the Union, President Bush called Iraq, together with Iran and North Korea part of an “axis of evil”.[8] In this address the president also claimed the right to wage a preventative war. Early in 2002, the administration began pressuring Iraq as well as the international community on greater compliance by Iraq with UN resolutions.

As a result of intelligence received in October 2001, the CIA sent former Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV to Niger in February 2002 to investigate the claim that Iraq was attempting to buy uranium to revamp its nuclear WMD program. Wilson interviewed several high-ranking Nigerian government officials. He found no evidence for the sale and concluded that the claim was “unequivocally wrong”.[9] However, Mr. Wilson’s report was not passed on to higher ranking officials in the CIA and the White House was only informed of it much later.


Work in Progress

References

  1. REPORT ON THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S PREWAR INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS ON IRAQ United States Senate, ordered July 7, 2004. Retrieved May 7, 2008.
  2. Letter from the Project for a New American Century to President Bill Clinton. Dated January 26, 1998. Retrieved May 7, 2008.
  3. Ali A. Allawi. The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace. New Haven (Conn.): Yale University Press, 2007, p. 72.
  4. Cameron G. Thies. “From Containment to the Bush Doctrine: The Road to War with Iraq.” In: John Davis ed. Presidential Policies and the Road to the Second Iraq War. Aldershot (UK)/Burlington (VT):Ashgate, 193-207, here p. 200.
  5. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,235395,00.html Time Magazine reports
  6. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/02/16/iraq.airstrike/ CNN reports
  7. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, The White House, September 2002. (Page 6 in the printed edition). Retrieved May 8, 2008.
  8. 2002 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush, January 29, 2002. Retrieved May 8, 2008.
  9. REPORT ON THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S PREWAR INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS ON IRAQ United States Senate, ordered July 7, 2004. Retrieved May 8, 2008.