Fiscal multiplier/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


<!--
==Measuring the Multiplier==
Assessing the current size of fiscal multipliers
Disagreements among economists about the size of the fiscal multiplier arise in part from the technical difficulties of estimating its magnitude under the conditions ruling at the time of a particular fiscal change. A partial escape from those difficulties can be achieved by referring to experience during comparable periods, but there have been numerous attempts to escape from the the data limitations of that approach.  
is complex, in that the value taken depends on its composition, its permanent nature, and on the economic
environment at large. The large majority of estimates of first-year spending multipliers in normal times are
located in the range of 0.4 to 1.2. The values are lower – quite often below 0.7 - for tax multipliers. Therefore, if
the composition of observed consolidation is taken as a guide, multipliers are expected in general to be lower
than the highest estimates: using observed changes in revenues and expenditures to GDP ratios as proxies for the
composition of the adjustment shows that in 2012 consolidation is equally shared in revenue and expenditure
measures. In the same direction also go the indications that comes from the mostly permanent nature of the  
consolidation in the EU.
However, it is likely that in the current juncture impact multipliers are higher than normal because 1)
the literature stresses that in situations of crisis, and of financial crisis in particular, with many agents
constrained in the financial markets, multipliers are larger than average; and 2) monetary policy is unable or
unwilling to offset the deflationary effect of a consolidation
Christine Romer has argued that that it is "incredibly hard"  to estimate the value of a multiplier because fiscal actions are often taken in response to other things happening in the economy, and separating the impact of those other factors from the impact of fiscal change very difficult. Failure to do so can result in [[omitted-variable bias]] resulting in an underestimate of the multiplier - an error that Ms Romer believes to be common.
<ref>[http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2012/pdf/ecp460_en.pdf Jocelyn Boussard, Francisco de Castro and Matteo Salto: ''Fiscal Multipliers and Public Debt Dynamics in Consolidations'', European Commission, July 2012]</ref>.
-->


One group of  researchers use a [[regression analysis]] technique known as SVAR<ref> Jan Gottschalk: ''An Introduction into the SVAR Methodology: Identification, Interpretation
and Limitations of SVAR models, KielWorking Paper No. 1072, August 2001 [http://faculty.washington.edu/ezivot/econ584/notes/svar%20survey.pdf]</ref> to determine the typical reaction of output to previously recorded fiscal changes. The problem about this method is that fiscal changes have often been taken in response to other things happening in the economy. Separating the impact of those other factors from the impact of fiscal change can be very difficult, and  failure to do so successfully can result in [[omitted-variable bias]] resulting in an underestimate of the multiplier. According to [[Economics/Catalogs#Christine Romer|Christine Romer]], that has been a common cause of error<ref>[http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/Written%20Version%20of%20Effects%20of%20Fiscal%20Policy.pdf Christina D. Romer: ''What do we know about the effects of fiscal policy?'', Lecture at Hamilton College, November 7, 2011]</ref>.


<ref>[http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/Written%20Version%20of%20Effects%20of%20Fiscal%20Policy.pdf Christina D. Romer: ''What do we know about the effects of fiscal policy?'', Lecture at Hamilton College, November 7, 2011]</ref>
Another approach involves the use of a development of [[general equilibrium]] models of the economy<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/eco/economicoutlookanalysisandforecasts/35567467.pdf Antonio M. Borges: ''Applied General Equilibrium Models: an assessment of their usefulness for policy analysis'', OECD]</ref> termed
 
DSGE<ref>[http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/ew/academic/intecon/Degrauwe/PDG-papers/Recently_published_articles/PCH2010.pdf  Paul De Grauwe ''The scientific foundation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models'', Public Choice, 13 July 2010]</ref>). Such models represent the equilibrium situation after the completion of the adjustments needed to bring supply into line in the product and labour markets. Multipliers estimated by their use are concerned with the ultimate effect of fiscal change rather than its short-term impact. The reliability of their estimates depend, in any case, upon the accuracy of the empirical and judgemental relationships embodied in the models.




{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 17:38, 19 November 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
 
Tutorials relating to the topic of Fiscal multiplier.

Measuring the Multiplier

Disagreements among economists about the size of the fiscal multiplier arise in part from the technical difficulties of estimating its magnitude under the conditions ruling at the time of a particular fiscal change. A partial escape from those difficulties can be achieved by referring to experience during comparable periods, but there have been numerous attempts to escape from the the data limitations of that approach.

One group of researchers use a regression analysis technique known as SVAR[1] to determine the typical reaction of output to previously recorded fiscal changes. The problem about this method is that fiscal changes have often been taken in response to other things happening in the economy. Separating the impact of those other factors from the impact of fiscal change can be very difficult, and failure to do so successfully can result in omitted-variable bias resulting in an underestimate of the multiplier. According to Christine Romer, that has been a common cause of error[2].

Another approach involves the use of a development of general equilibrium models of the economy[3] termed DSGE[4]). Such models represent the equilibrium situation after the completion of the adjustments needed to bring supply into line in the product and labour markets. Multipliers estimated by their use are concerned with the ultimate effect of fiscal change rather than its short-term impact. The reliability of their estimates depend, in any case, upon the accuracy of the empirical and judgemental relationships embodied in the models.