Emergency Committee for Israel: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
The '''Emergency Committee for Israel''' (ECI) defines its mission as "mounting an active defense of the US-Israel relationship by educating the public about the positions of political candidates on this important issue, and by keeping the public informed of the latest developments in both countries." <ref>{{citation
The '''Emergency Committee for Israel''' (ECI) defines its mission as "mounting an active defense of the US-Israel relationship by educating the public about the positions of political candidates on this important issue, and by keeping the public informed of the latest developments in both countries." <ref>{{citation
  | url = http://www.committeeforisrael.com/about/
  | url = http://www.committeeforisrael.com/about/
  | title = About
  | title = About
  | publisher = Emergency Committee for Israel}}</ref> Formed in July 2010 as a [[501(c)(4)]] nonprofit political organization, <ref>{{citation
  | publisher = Emergency Committee for Israel}}</ref> Formed in July 2010 as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit political organization, <ref>{{citation
  | title = Group to oppose President Obama's Mideast policy
  | title = Group to oppose President Obama's Mideast policy
  | journal = Politico
  | journal = Politico
Line 10: Line 9:
  | author = Ben Smith  | date = 12 July 2010}}</ref> it unites "The hawkish, neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of whom are Jewish, and conservative Evangelical Christians who have become increasingly outspoken in their support for Israel."  
  | author = Ben Smith  | date = 12 July 2010}}</ref> it unites "The hawkish, neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of whom are Jewish, and conservative Evangelical Christians who have become increasingly outspoken in their support for Israel."  


The group obtained media attention even before its website was live. CNN's [[Campbell Brown]], who is the spouse of [[Daniel Senor]], had ECI's executive director as a guest [[Noah Pollak]] of [[Commentary (magazine)|''Commentary'']], to appear on her show before its website was online. <ref>{{citation
The group obtained media attention even before its website was live. CNN's Campbell Brown, who is the spouse of Daniel Senor, had ECI's executive director as a guest Noah Pollak of Commentary (magazine)|''Commentary'', to appear on her show before its website was online. <ref>{{citation
  | url = http://www.cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1007/06/ec.01.html
  | url = http://www.cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1007/06/ec.01.html
  | editor = Campbell Brown
  | editor = Campbell Brown
Line 17: Line 16:
  | title = Immigration Showdown; President Obama Meets With Israeli Prime Minister}}</ref>
  | title = Immigration Showdown; President Obama Meets With Israeli Prime Minister}}</ref>
==Linkages==
==Linkages==
Its founding Board of Directors consists of [[William Kristol]], [[Gary Bauer]], and [[Rachel Abrams]].  Kristol is often considered the dean of [[neoconservatism|neoconservative]]s. Bauer is a [[Christian Zionism|Christian Zionist]]. Abrams is the writer-blogger spouse of [[Elliott Abrams]] and daughter of [[Midge Decter]] and [[Norman Podhoretz]].<ref>{{citation
Its founding Board of Directors consists of William Kristol, Gary Bauer, and Rachel Abrams.  Kristol is often considered the dean of neoconservatism|neoconservatives. Bauer is a Christian Zionism|Christian Zionist. Abrams is the writer-blogger spouse of Elliott Abrams and daughter of Midge Decter and Norman Podhoretz.<ref>{{citation
  | title = Rachel Abrams’ gay thang
  | title = Rachel Abrams’ gay thang
  | author = Ron Kampeas | date = 15 July 2010  
  | author = Ron Kampeas | date = 15 July 2010  
Line 23: Line 22:
  | publisher = Jewish Telegraph Agency}}</ref>
  | publisher = Jewish Telegraph Agency}}</ref>


[[Matthew Duss]], a research associate at the [[Center for American Progress]], reported that the group's offices  have been used by other neoconservative organizations, and are also the address of [[Randy Scheunemann]]'s public relations firm. Scheunemann, a Republican consultant, is the foreign policy trainer to [[Sarah Palin]], ran the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, was the staff director for the [[Project for the New American Century]], and an ally of [[Ahmed Chalabi]][[Michael Goldfarb]], who works for Scheunemann, is an adviser to the Emergency Committee, and also to another group co-founded by Kristol and [[Liz Cheney]], [[Keep America Safe]].<ref>{{citation
Matthew Duss, a research associate at the Center for American Progress, reported that the group's offices  have been used by other neoconservative organizations, and are also the address of Randy Scheunemann's public relations firm. Scheunemann, a Republican consultant, is the foreign policy trainer to Sarah Palin, ran the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, was the staff director for the Project for the New American Century, and an ally of Ahmed Chalabi.  Michael Goldfarb, who works for Scheunemann, is an adviser to the Emergency Committee, and also to another group co-founded by Kristol and Liz Cheney, Keep America Safe.<ref>{{citation
  | date = 16 July 2010
  | date = 16 July 2010
  | title = Neocon 'Emergency Committee for Israel' Based Out Of 'Committee for the Liberation of Iraq' Offices  
  | title = Neocon 'Emergency Committee for Israel' Based Out Of 'Committee for the Liberation of Iraq' Offices  
  | publisher = [[Huffington Post]]
  | publisher = Huffington Post
  | url =http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-duss/neocon-emergency-committe_b_649116.html}}</ref>
  | url =http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-duss/neocon-emergency-committe_b_649116.html}}</ref>


Duss quoted Goldfarb as saying that the Committee had no position on the two-state solution, which has been opposed by board member [[Gary Bauer]]: <blockquote>“the group doesn’t have a position on the creation of a Palestinian state...ECI is for a strong US-Israel relationship and a strong, secure Israel at peace with the Palestinians and all its neighbors — but Israel is a democratic ally that must determine for itself the best way to achieve this goal,”<ref>{{citation
Duss quoted Goldfarb as saying that the Committee had no position on the two-state solution, which has been opposed by board member Gary Bauer: <blockquote>“the group doesn’t have a position on the creation of a Palestinian state...ECI is for a strong US-Israel relationship and a strong, secure Israel at peace with the Palestinians and all its neighbors — but Israel is a democratic ally that must determine for itself the best way to achieve this goal,”<ref>{{citation
  | title = ‘Emergency Committee for Israel’ Refuses To Take Position On Two State Solution   
  | title = ‘Emergency Committee for Israel’ Refuses To Take Position On Two State Solution   
  | author = Matt Duss  | date = 13 July 2010
  | author = Matt Duss  | date = 13 July 2010
Line 35: Line 34:
  | url = http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/13/emergency-committee-for-israel-refuses-to-take-position-on-two-state-solution/}}</ref></blockquote>
  | url = http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/07/13/emergency-committee-for-israel-refuses-to-take-position-on-two-state-solution/}}</ref></blockquote>


[[David Frum]] speaks of its executive director, [[Noah Pollak]], as an immensely talented communicator for Israel, who proposed that the [[Israeli Defense Forces]] introduce a [[YouTube]] channel, during the [[2009 Gaza conflict]], to correct propaganda of the other side.<ref>{{citation
David Frum speaks of its executive director, Noah Pollak, as an immensely talented communicator for Israel, who proposed that the Israeli Defense Forces introduce a YouTube channel, during the 2009 Gaza conflict, to correct propaganda of the other side.<ref>{{citation
  | url = http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/emergency-committee-for-israel.html
  | url = http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/emergency-committee-for-israel.html
  | journal = The Daily Dish, [[Atlantic Monthly]]
  | journal = The Daily Dish, Atlantic Monthly
  | author = [[David Frum]]
  | author = David Frum
  | date = 13 July 2010}}</ref> Answering questions from the ''[[Jerusalem Post]]'', Pollak contrasted ECI with [[J Street]]. <blockquote>Well, for starters, ECI is pro-Israel. Our purpose is to address three major threats to the U.S.-Israel alliance in the context of the American political debate: the [[Iranian nuclear program]] and Iran's sponsorship of terrorist groups; the campaign to delegitimize and isolate Israel; and the hostility of the Obama administration to the traditional closeness of the two nations. At bottom, we believe that the turn against Israel is a rejection of America's special role in the world as a defender of liberal democracies. We will do great damage to our own national soul if we allow ourselves to become cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state.
  | date = 13 July 2010}}</ref> Answering questions from the ''Jerusalem Post'', Pollak contrasted ECI with J Street. <blockquote>Well, for starters, ECI is pro-Israel. Our purpose is to address three major threats to the U.S.-Israel alliance in the context of the American political debate: the Iranian nuclear program and Iran's sponsorship of terrorist groups; the campaign to delegitimize and isolate Israel; and the hostility of the Obama administration to the traditional closeness of the two nations. At bottom, we believe that the turn against Israel is a rejection of America's special role in the world as a defender of liberal democracies. We will do great damage to our own national soul if we allow ourselves to become cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state.
<ref>{{citation
<ref>{{citation
  | date = 15 July 2010 | journal = [[Jerusalem Post]]
  | date = 15 July 2010 | journal = Jerusalem Post
  | title = Rosner's Domain: Noah Pollak on "cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state"  
  | title = Rosner's Domain: Noah Pollak on "cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state"  
  | url = http://cgis.jpost.com/Blogs/rosner/entry/noah_pollak_on_cynical_participants}}</ref></blockquote>
  | url = http://cgis.jpost.com/Blogs/rosner/entry/noah_pollak_on_cynical_participants}}</ref></blockquote>
==Sestak campaign==
==2010 campaign==
Their first target is the Democratic candidate for Senate in [[Pennsylvania]], [[Joe Sestak]], as part of broader criticism of [[Obama Administration]] Mideast policy. They have accused Sestak of "appearing at a fundraiser for the [[Council on American Islamic Relations]], which it describes as an “anti-Israel organization the FBI called a ‘front group for [[Hamas]].’” " and endorsing a letter against the Israeli blockade of Gaza.  <ref>{{citation
Their first target is the Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania (U.S. state)|Pennsylvania, Joe Sestak, as part of broader criticism of Obama Administration Mideast policy. They have accused Sestak of "appearing at a fundraiser for the Council on American Islamic Relations, which it describes as an “anti-Israel organization the FBI called a ‘front group for Hamas.’” " and endorsing a letter against the Israeli blockade of Gaza.  <ref>{{citation
  | url =http://www.politico.com/pdf/PPM152_comcast_eci_071510.pdf
  | url =http://www.politico.com/pdf/PPM152_comcast_eci_071510.pdf
  | title = Document package
  | title = Document package
Line 55: Line 54:
  | title = Letter to  Charlie Thurston, President, Comcast Spotlight from Jared G. Solomon, General Counsel, Sestak for Senate}}</ref>
  | title = Letter to  Charlie Thurston, President, Comcast Spotlight from Jared G. Solomon, General Counsel, Sestak for Senate}}</ref>


[[David Frum]] described this action as indicative of an overall "...coming shift in the American Jewish community. While most American Jews vote Democrat, those Jews most passionately involved with Israel have felt ever-increasing mistrust of Barack Obama, his administration and his party." <ref>{{citation
David Frum described this action as indicative of an overall "...coming shift in the American Jewish community. While most American Jews vote Democrat, those Jews most passionately involved with Israel have felt ever-increasing mistrust of Barack Obama, his administration and his party." <ref>{{citation
  | title = The New In-Your-Face Israel Lobby
  | title = The New In-Your-Face Israel Lobby
  | date = 17 July 2010
  | date = 17 July 2010
  | url = http://www.frumforum.com/the-new-in-your-face-israel-lobby
  | url = http://www.frumforum.com/the-new-in-your-face-israel-lobby
  | author = [[David Frum]]
  | author = David Frum
  | journal = Frum Forum
  | journal = Frum Forum
}}</ref>   
}}</ref>   


Identified with the left wing of American-Israeli relations, [[M.J. Rosenberg]], Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at [[MediaMatters|Media Matters]], who formerly worked for the [[Israel Policy Forum]], wrote that the "ad could very easily stir up anti-Semitism because it suggests, rather powerfully, that American Jews care not about America but only about Israel. " He interpreted Kristol's statement that Emergency Committee is "the pro-Israel wing of the pro-Israel community." "By that, he means that unlike AIPAC, which at least invokes US security, the Emergency Committee is only about Israel."<ref>{{citation
Identified with the left wing of American-Israeli relations, M.J. Rosenberg, Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at MediaMatters|Media Matters, who formerly worked for the Israel Policy Forum, wrote that the "ad could very easily stir up anti-Semitism because it suggests, rather powerfully, that American Jews care not about America but only about Israel. " He interpreted Kristol's statement that Emergency Committee is "the pro-Israel wing of the pro-Israel community." "By that, he means that unlike AIPAC, which at least invokes US security, the Emergency Committee is only about Israel."<ref>{{citation
  | title = Neocons: Dual Loyalties Or Just One
  | title = Neocons: Dual Loyalties Or Just One
  | author = [[M.J. Rosenberg]] | date = 14 July 2010
  | author = M.J. Rosenberg | date = 14 July 2010
  | url = http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/14/neocons_demand_sestak_put_israel_first/
  | url = http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/14/neocons_demand_sestak_put_israel_first/
  | publisher = TPMcafe}}</ref>
  | publisher = TPMcafe}}</ref>


The [[Jewish Telegraph Agency]] reports that the race is taking on national significance, as it explores whether candidates can successfully ally themselves with less hard-line groups such as [[J Street]]. Believing that it is too dangerous to alienate groups such as the [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]], "dovish" congressman have refused J Street support, such as  Rep. [[Adam Schiff]] (D-Calif.), "a Jewish lawmaker who took J Street's money in 2008 but is not on their roster of 61 endorsees this year." [[Jeremy Ben Ami]], J Street's executive director, said "There's no question that this race is a very important test of what kind of support J Street and  its supporters can deliver/ We will show a substantial amount of money can be raised from our political action committee, and that a substantial amount of money can be raised for a candidate that opposes the right wing on these issues." <ref>{{citation
The Jewish Telegraph Agency reports that the race is taking on national significance, as it explores whether candidates can successfully ally themselves with less hard-line groups such as J Street. Believing that it is too dangerous to alienate groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, "dovish" congressman have refused J Street support, such as  Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), "a Jewish lawmaker who took J Street's money in 2008 but is not on their roster of 61 endorsees this year." Jeremy Ben Ami, J Street's executive director, said "There's no question that this race is a very important test of what kind of support J Street and  its supporters can deliver/ We will show a substantial amount of money can be raised from our political action committee, and that a substantial amount of money can be raised for a candidate that opposes the right wing on these issues." <ref>{{citation
   | title = Pa. Senate race turning into Israel proxy fight
   | title = Pa. Senate race turning into Israel proxy fight
   | author = Ron Kampeas | date = 20 July 2010
   | author = Ron Kampeas | date = 20 July 2010
   | publisher = Jewish Telegraph Agency
   | publisher = Jewish Telegraph Agency
  | url = http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/07/20/2740128/pa-senate-race-seen-as-national-test-for-j-street}}</ref>  
  | url = http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/07/20/2740128/pa-senate-race-seen-as-national-test-for-j-street}}</ref>  
Kristol has suggested that ECI is challenging, as well as J Street on the left,  the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), usually thought to be on the right, but not far-right, of U.S.-Israel positions. "There are some who say they’re pro-Israel but aren’t really ... then there’s AIPAC, which is a wonderful organization, but one that’s very committed to working with the administration, so they pull some punches publicly. ''Jewish Week'' also quoted Bauer on J Street: "You have to take a group and look at what it does. In my view, you have to come up with a pretty bizarre definition of ‘pro-Israel’ to fit J Street into that category.”<ref>{{citation
| url = http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/national/gop_heavies_launch_new_pro_israel_group
| journal = Jewish Week
| author = James D. Besser
| title = GOP Heavies Launch New Pro-Israel Group: Kristol, Bauer target J Street’s candidate in Pa. Senate race.
| date = 14 July 2010}}</ref>  Kristol's criticism of working with the Administration reflects other comments that wonder to what extent ECI is concerned with Republican interests.
==Legal issues of foreign representation==
==Legal issues of foreign representation==
[[W. Patrick Lang]] asked, on his blog, "Why is this new outfit not  a candidate for registration under FARA ([[Foreign Agents Registration Act]])?  It advocates partuiular American foreign policy positions on behalf of  foreign country and seeks to directly pressure legislators to adopt positions favorable to that foreign power.<ref>{{citation
W. Patrick Lang asked, on his blog, "Why is this new outfit not  a candidate for registration under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act)?  It advocates partuiular American foreign policy positions on behalf of  foreign country and seeks to directly pressure legislators to adopt positions favorable to that foreign power.<ref>{{citation
  | title = AIPAC/Likudniks versus Sestak Rd. 1
  | title = AIPAC/Likudniks versus Sestak Rd. 1
  | url = http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2010/07/aipaclikudniks-versus-sestak-rd-1.html
  | url = http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2010/07/aipaclikudniks-versus-sestak-rd-1.html
  | date = 13 July 2010
  | date = 13 July 2010
  | author = [[W. Patrick Lang]]
  | author = W. Patrick Lang
  | journal = Sic Semper Tyrannis}}</ref> In a followup the next day, he asked "Have you registered as foreign agents, under the Foreign Agents Registration Act? This seems to be one of the most cut and dried cases of mandatory registration. They are openly advertising that they are serving as a lobby for Israel. And, by the way, as a string of law suits against [[American Israel Public Affairs Committee|AIPAC]], and an [[Federal Election Commission|FEC]] ruling against [[Anti-Defamation League|ADL]] make clear, foreign agents, whether individuals or organizations, cannot interfere, in any way, in U.S. electoral affairs."<ref>{{citation
  | journal = Sic Semper Tyrannis}}</ref> In a followup the next day, he asked "Have you registered as foreign agents, under the Foreign Agents Registration Act? This seems to be one of the most cut and dried cases of mandatory registration. They are openly advertising that they are serving as a lobby for Israel. And, by the way, as a string of law suits against American Israel Public Affairs Committee|AIPAC, and an Federal Election Commission|FEC ruling against Anti-Defamation League|ADL make clear, foreign agents, whether individuals or organizations, cannot interfere, in any way, in U.S. electoral affairs."<ref>{{citation
  | title = FARA and the Emergency Committee for Israel
  | title = FARA and the Emergency Committee for Israel
  | url = http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2010/07/fara-and-the-emergency-committee-for-isral.html
  | url = http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2010/07/fara-and-the-emergency-committee-for-isral.html
  | date = 14 July 2010
  | date = 14 July 2010
  | author = [[W. Patrick Lang]]
  | author = W. Patrick Lang
  | journal = Sic Semper Tyrannis}}</ref>
  | journal = Sic Semper Tyrannis}}</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}

Latest revision as of 17:56, 16 March 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI) defines its mission as "mounting an active defense of the US-Israel relationship by educating the public about the positions of political candidates on this important issue, and by keeping the public informed of the latest developments in both countries." [1] Formed in July 2010 as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit political organization, [2] it unites "The hawkish, neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of whom are Jewish, and conservative Evangelical Christians who have become increasingly outspoken in their support for Israel."

The group obtained media attention even before its website was live. CNN's Campbell Brown, who is the spouse of Daniel Senor, had ECI's executive director as a guest Noah Pollak of Commentary (magazine)|Commentary, to appear on her show before its website was online. [3]

Linkages

Its founding Board of Directors consists of William Kristol, Gary Bauer, and Rachel Abrams. Kristol is often considered the dean of neoconservatism|neoconservatives. Bauer is a Christian Zionism|Christian Zionist. Abrams is the writer-blogger spouse of Elliott Abrams and daughter of Midge Decter and Norman Podhoretz.[4]

Matthew Duss, a research associate at the Center for American Progress, reported that the group's offices have been used by other neoconservative organizations, and are also the address of Randy Scheunemann's public relations firm. Scheunemann, a Republican consultant, is the foreign policy trainer to Sarah Palin, ran the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, was the staff director for the Project for the New American Century, and an ally of Ahmed Chalabi. Michael Goldfarb, who works for Scheunemann, is an adviser to the Emergency Committee, and also to another group co-founded by Kristol and Liz Cheney, Keep America Safe.[5]

Duss quoted Goldfarb as saying that the Committee had no position on the two-state solution, which has been opposed by board member Gary Bauer:

“the group doesn’t have a position on the creation of a Palestinian state...ECI is for a strong US-Israel relationship and a strong, secure Israel at peace with the Palestinians and all its neighbors — but Israel is a democratic ally that must determine for itself the best way to achieve this goal,”[6]

David Frum speaks of its executive director, Noah Pollak, as an immensely talented communicator for Israel, who proposed that the Israeli Defense Forces introduce a YouTube channel, during the 2009 Gaza conflict, to correct propaganda of the other side.[7] Answering questions from the Jerusalem Post, Pollak contrasted ECI with J Street.

Well, for starters, ECI is pro-Israel. Our purpose is to address three major threats to the U.S.-Israel alliance in the context of the American political debate: the Iranian nuclear program and Iran's sponsorship of terrorist groups; the campaign to delegitimize and isolate Israel; and the hostility of the Obama administration to the traditional closeness of the two nations. At bottom, we believe that the turn against Israel is a rejection of America's special role in the world as a defender of liberal democracies. We will do great damage to our own national soul if we allow ourselves to become cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state. [8]

2010 campaign

Their first target is the Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania (U.S. state)|Pennsylvania, Joe Sestak, as part of broader criticism of Obama Administration Mideast policy. They have accused Sestak of "appearing at a fundraiser for the Council on American Islamic Relations, which it describes as an “anti-Israel organization the FBI called a ‘front group for Hamas.’” " and endorsing a letter against the Israeli blockade of Gaza. [9]

Denying the allegations, the Sestak campaign has sent a cease-and-desist latter to Comcast, which carries the ad. [10]

David Frum described this action as indicative of an overall "...coming shift in the American Jewish community. While most American Jews vote Democrat, those Jews most passionately involved with Israel have felt ever-increasing mistrust of Barack Obama, his administration and his party." [11]

Identified with the left wing of American-Israeli relations, M.J. Rosenberg, Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at MediaMatters|Media Matters, who formerly worked for the Israel Policy Forum, wrote that the "ad could very easily stir up anti-Semitism because it suggests, rather powerfully, that American Jews care not about America but only about Israel. " He interpreted Kristol's statement that Emergency Committee is "the pro-Israel wing of the pro-Israel community." "By that, he means that unlike AIPAC, which at least invokes US security, the Emergency Committee is only about Israel."[12]

The Jewish Telegraph Agency reports that the race is taking on national significance, as it explores whether candidates can successfully ally themselves with less hard-line groups such as J Street. Believing that it is too dangerous to alienate groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, "dovish" congressman have refused J Street support, such as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), "a Jewish lawmaker who took J Street's money in 2008 but is not on their roster of 61 endorsees this year." Jeremy Ben Ami, J Street's executive director, said "There's no question that this race is a very important test of what kind of support J Street and its supporters can deliver/ We will show a substantial amount of money can be raised from our political action committee, and that a substantial amount of money can be raised for a candidate that opposes the right wing on these issues." [13]

Kristol has suggested that ECI is challenging, as well as J Street on the left, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), usually thought to be on the right, but not far-right, of U.S.-Israel positions. "There are some who say they’re pro-Israel but aren’t really ... then there’s AIPAC, which is a wonderful organization, but one that’s very committed to working with the administration, so they pull some punches publicly. Jewish Week also quoted Bauer on J Street: "You have to take a group and look at what it does. In my view, you have to come up with a pretty bizarre definition of ‘pro-Israel’ to fit J Street into that category.”[14] Kristol's criticism of working with the Administration reflects other comments that wonder to what extent ECI is concerned with Republican interests.

Legal issues of foreign representation

W. Patrick Lang asked, on his blog, "Why is this new outfit not a candidate for registration under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act)? It advocates partuiular American foreign policy positions on behalf of foreign country and seeks to directly pressure legislators to adopt positions favorable to that foreign power.[15] In a followup the next day, he asked "Have you registered as foreign agents, under the Foreign Agents Registration Act? This seems to be one of the most cut and dried cases of mandatory registration. They are openly advertising that they are serving as a lobby for Israel. And, by the way, as a string of law suits against American Israel Public Affairs Committee|AIPAC, and an Federal Election Commission|FEC ruling against Anti-Defamation League|ADL make clear, foreign agents, whether individuals or organizations, cannot interfere, in any way, in U.S. electoral affairs."[16]

References

  1. About, Emergency Committee for Israel
  2. Ben Smith (12 July 2010), "Group to oppose President Obama's Mideast policy", Politico
  3. Campbell Brown, ed. (6 July 2010), "Immigration Showdown; President Obama Meets With Israeli Prime Minister", CNN
  4. Ron Kampeas (15 July 2010), Rachel Abrams’ gay thang, Jewish Telegraph Agency
  5. Neocon 'Emergency Committee for Israel' Based Out Of 'Committee for the Liberation of Iraq' Offices, Huffington Post, 16 July 2010
  6. Matt Duss (13 July 2010), "‘Emergency Committee for Israel’ Refuses To Take Position On Two State Solution", Wonk Room, Center for American Progress
  7. David Frum (13 July 2010), The Daily Dish, Atlantic Monthly
  8. "Rosner's Domain: Noah Pollak on "cynical participants in the international lynching of the Jewish state"", Jerusalem Post, 15 July 2010
  9. Document package, Emergency Campaign for Israel
  10. Letter to Charlie Thurston, President, Comcast Spotlight from Jared G. Solomon, General Counsel, Sestak for Senate, 16 July 2010
  11. David Frum (17 July 2010), "The New In-Your-Face Israel Lobby", Frum Forum
  12. M.J. Rosenberg (14 July 2010), Neocons: Dual Loyalties Or Just One, TPMcafe
  13. Ron Kampeas (20 July 2010), Pa. Senate race turning into Israel proxy fight, Jewish Telegraph Agency
  14. James D. Besser (14 July 2010), "GOP Heavies Launch New Pro-Israel Group: Kristol, Bauer target J Street’s candidate in Pa. Senate race.", Jewish Week
  15. W. Patrick Lang (13 July 2010), "AIPAC/Likudniks versus Sestak Rd. 1", Sic Semper Tyrannis
  16. W. Patrick Lang (14 July 2010), "FARA and the Emergency Committee for Israel", Sic Semper Tyrannis