CZ:Approval Announcements: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati
imported>Nancy Sculerati
Line 14: Line 14:
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_to_1800]]   
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_to_1800]]   
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_since_1800]]
*[[Pittsburgh%2C_History_since_1800]]
CONGRATULATIONS!!


==<font size="3" color="660000"> April 27, 2007 </font>==
==<font size="3" color="660000"> April 27, 2007 </font>==

Revision as of 17:29, 1 May 2007

May 1, 2007

Articles newly nominated for approval:
CZ:Workgroups#Natural_Sciences

Two mathematics articles are now up for approval: Complex number and Prime number. These are the first mathematics articles ever nominated for approval! I've copied the nominating editor's remarks from the Forums below: Note that these articles can still be improved before the approval takes hold on Sunday, May 6. In particular, a few sections were rearranged or moved to other articles recently, so the current version probably doesn't flow as well as it used to from section to section. But also there are several comments on their discussion pages that haven't been addressed yet; while many of them can wait for the future, we might as well try to get as good a first version approved as we can. So be bold! Greg Martin

Newly Approved Articles:
CZ:Workgroups#Humanities

Our very first History articles to be approved!

CONGRATULATIONS!!

April 27, 2007

This announcement is for the wiki hackers among us: the skin for Approved articles needs a facial.

What's needed? (All registered users should feel free to add to & edit this list)

  • Approved articles need a look that tells the user that he or she is reading an approved article
  • A conventional means of indicating important facts (such as: nominating editor, date approved, list of approving editors) is also needed
  • A clear disclaimer

What's been said so far?

Here are threads on the forum that all deserve our attention (please add to these):

  • Re: Proof versions of articles« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2007, 04:43:23 PM »[1]
  • Should there be a Group Approval Template? [2]

Here are current pages on Citizendium that have to do with Approval templates:

Invitation to link sandbox trials here

(To make your own sandbox page, edit your user page and create a link to the sandbox page as if it already existed, like this: [[User:Nancy_Sculerati/Sandbox]]. After completing the edit, you'll see the red link; just click on the red link to start the new page. Any author can create a page anywhere in the same way. -- as per Pat Palmer)

Perhaps drafts of templates and styles for approved articles might be linked here?


April 26, 2007

Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval (or indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):

Copying Jason's post from the Forums [3]: I have a favor to ask of the History Workgroup. The article First Punic War appears high on Google searches. It has been steadily climibing, currently 10 to 12 in rank on a search for first punic war. If this article can be pushed along to approved status, this would be good PR. -Jason Potkanski Tech Lead


April 24, 2007

Our first of the Tuesday Night Rundowns on approved articles begins! Our first set of announcements is itself an "announcement of firsts".


Developing articles that need editors to nominate them for approval (or indicate what is needed before such nomination can be made):

Calling Mathematics editors to review:

These are candidates for our first Mathematics articles for nomination. Where are our editors?


Articles newly nominated for approval:

Humanities

CZ:Workgroups#Humanities

Our very first History articles to be nominated!


Just Approved Articles

CZ:Workgroups#Applied Arts and Sciences
  • Infant colic Our very first Health Sciences article to be approved!