Archive:Should authors share copyright with the Citizendium Foundation?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling (Introduction to the issue, intended to be neutral (others should check:-)) |
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling (A general outline of issues to be debated) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Copyright is valuable, and authors are usually given something (not necessarily money) in return for sharing it, or granting lesser rights. | * Copyright is valuable, and authors are usually given something (not necessarily money) in return for sharing it, or granting lesser rights. | ||
* Sharing copyright grants a lot of power to the Citizendium Foundation, which can be used in both positive and negative ways. | * Sharing copyright grants a lot of power to the Citizendium Foundation, which can be used in both positive and negative ways. | ||
=Affirmative: request copyright sharing= | |||
==Argument: copyright sharing makes relicensing of content significantly easier== | |||
A copyright holder can release their material under any terms they wish. If at some point in the future it becomes desirable to switch licenses or release material under a different license, the Citizendium Foundation will be able to implement this decision instantly for the majority of content. | |||
===Reply: The power to relicense can be used against the interests of the community=== | |||
===Reply: The inclusion of material sourced from third parties renders this impractical=== | |||
==Argument: copyright sharing makes it easier to defend license violations== | |||
=Negative: do not request copyright sharing= | |||
==Argument: copyright remaining with individual contributors protects the community== | |||
===Reply: within an appropriate framework of guarantees to accompany copyright sharing, the community's rights can be maintained=== | |||
==Argument: contributors should not be expected to share copyright without getting something in return== | |||
===Reply: copyright can be shared in return for certain commitments on the part of the Citizendium Foundation=== | |||
==Argument: people are wary of giving copyright to others even for money, requesting it will reduce the number of willing contributors== | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 23 March 2007
The issue
In addition to making their work available to Citizendium under the chosen license terms, should contributors also share copyright for their original contributions with Citizendium?
It needs to be stressed that this is not a request for copyright transfer. Authors retain copyright themselves but agree to grant it to the Citizendium Foundation as well.
Some relevant points:
- Contributors can only share copyright for their own original contributions, not material sourced from third parties such as (but not limited to) Wikipedia.
- Copyright is valuable, and authors are usually given something (not necessarily money) in return for sharing it, or granting lesser rights.
- Sharing copyright grants a lot of power to the Citizendium Foundation, which can be used in both positive and negative ways.
Affirmative: request copyright sharing
Argument: copyright sharing makes relicensing of content significantly easier
A copyright holder can release their material under any terms they wish. If at some point in the future it becomes desirable to switch licenses or release material under a different license, the Citizendium Foundation will be able to implement this decision instantly for the majority of content.