User talk:Gareth Leng
Please join us for Biology Week!
|
Hello, I am giving you this personal invitation to join us this week for Biology Week! Please join us on the wiki and add or edit biology articles. Also, please let your friends and colleagues who are biologists, biology students, or naturalists, know about Biology Week and ask them to join us, too. Any way you can help make it an event would be most welcome. Think of it as a Biology Workgroup open house. Let's see if we can kick up activity a notch! Thanks in advance! --Larry Sanger 12:24, 22 September 2008 (CDT) |
(Just showing you what I'm putting on all editor pages. And isn't it time to archive your user talk page? ;-) --Larry Sanger 12:24, 22 September 2008 (CDT)
About the Sex Article
Thanks for your comments about my questions concerning the sex article. I'd like to see the same list of topics covered rigorously and well. At one point in my career, I studied reproductive behavior in rodents (rats, gerbils) but some 30 years ago my interests moved to human sexuality. My main interest is the ethological and ethnographic analysis of human courtship behavior, based on participant-observer ethnographic observations in a variety of settings. From your comments and the kind of work your group publishes, your interests are physiological and neuroendocrinological -- areas I genuinely wish we understood better in human beings. But from what I've seen, we're a long way behind the kind of understanding we have of rats (for example).
On that note, do you have a copy of your Jacques Benoit article you could email to me? (perpcorn@dca.net) Thanks!
I'm trying to get a feel for Citizendium and its inhabitants. Very friendly, I'd say! The sexuality articles are certainly one place to start thinking about what kinds of article might be most helpful. So many thanks for your welcome!
Timothy Perper 12:19, 25 September 2008 (CDT)
MRI
Gareth, I see that you are moderately positive about the article of Roy et al. in Materials Research Innovations (MRI). Do you know the purpose of this journal? It is the following:
- Because of its super peer review procedures, the journal is especially suited for the publication of results which are so new, so unexpected, that they are likely to be rejected by tradition-bound journals. Presumptive authors are invited to submit papers covering non-traditional topics at the frontier of science and technology and their management.
(From here)
The journal has flagship article a paper by Roy et al. on the burning of salt water by application of a polarised radiofrequency beam at 13.56 MHz (photons corresponding to this frequency have a VERY low energy, it is completely unclear how these photons could ever break a chemical bond, they could not even excite a rotation of water).
Further, did you notice sentences in the Roy et al. article on the structure of water such as:
- The most direct evidence, using infra-red spectroscopy (by E.G. Brame, an authority in that field) for the change of the structure of water by the “subtle energy” of healers hands in the U.S., has been presented by Schwartz et al. and Tiller.
There is more like this in this paper (for instance it is claimed that a weak static magnetic field can change the pH of water by one unit). --Paul Wormer 12:21, 25 September 2008 (CDT)