Template:CharterVote2/35/Discussion

From Citizendium
< Template:CharterVote2
Revision as of 11:13, 22 July 2010 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Jump to navigation Jump to search

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

See Also the discussion about the appeal process in Article 39

Revised article guaranteeing rights to fair hearing and identifying sanctions.

  • Whenever possible, disputes shall be settled informally at the lowest possible level. Specifically, the following shall apply:
  1. Any party involved in a dispute may contact the Ombudsman for assistance in dispute resolution.
  2. When a formal decision is necessary or demanded, the Ombudsman shall facilitate the presentation of the issue to the appropriate body, Editorial Council for content disputes, Management Council for disputes involving violation of the rules.
  3. The Management Council shall provide a formal mechanism of resolution that allows each disputant to fully and thoroughly present their relevant positions.   All citizens shall have the right to a fair hearing, which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: the opportunity to present one's case in one's defense, the right to be heard by a fair and unprejudiced body, the right to have others offer testimony on one's behalf.
  4. Citizens understand that the Editorial Council and the Management Council may impose sanctions that include blocking a citizen's access to Citizendium, removing or altering content, or terminating the citizen. The Management Council and Editorial Council may from time to time devise additional sanctions as appropriate.
  5. Citizens shall not have arbitrary or excessive sanctions imposed upon them.

I removed the strikeout and struck out "Citizen understand" and replaced "include" with "result in" because include seemed to give the EC the power to block an account which I think should only be for behavior and needs some MC/constable intervention to occur. The EC, however, may make a decision that, if not followed would result in the user being blocked. D. Matt Innis 17:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Whenever possible, disputes shall be settled informally at the lowest possible level. Specifically, the following shall apply:
  1. Any party involved in a dispute may contact the Ombudsman for assistance in dispute resolution.
  2. When a formal decision is necessary or demanded, the Ombudsman shall facilitate the presentation of the issue to the appropriate body, Editorial Council for content disputes, Management Council for disputes involving violation of the rules.
  3. All citizens shall have the right to a fair hearing, which shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: the opportunity to present one's case in one's defense, the right to be heard by a fair and unprejudiced body, the right to have others offer testimony on one's behalf.
  4. The Editorial Council and the Management Council may impose sanctions that result in blocking a citizen's access to Citizendium, removing or altering content, or terminating the citizen. The Management Council and Editorial Council may from time to time devise additional sanctions as appropriate.
  5. Citizens shall not have arbitrary or excessive sanctions imposed upon them.

Add:

  • When a dispute concerns content, it may be referred to an Editor with jurisdiction as defined by the Editorial Council. If the Citizen disagrees with that Editor's ruling, if there are multiple Editors for the subject, the next step is to consult the group thereof, assuming there is a response within seven (?) days. The Editorial Council will resolve matters not settled by this mechanism.

Howard C. Berkowitz 16:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)