Gaussian type orbitals

In quantum chemistry, a Gaussian type orbital (GTO) is a basis function in a linear combination of atomic orbitals that forms a molecular orbital.

A GTO is a real-valued function of a 3-dimensional vector r, the position vector of an electron with respect to an origin. Usually this origin is centered on a nucleus in a molecule, but in principle the origin can be anywhere in, or outside, a molecule. The defining characteristic of Gaussian type orbital is its radial part, which is given by a Gaussian function ${\scriptstyle \exp[-\alpha r^{2}]}$, where r is the length of r and α is a real parameter. The parameter α is usually taken from tables of atomic orbital basis sets, which are often contained in quantum chemical computer programs, or can be downloaded from the web. The tables may be prepared by energy minimizations, or by fitting to other (known) orbitals, for instance to Slater type orbitals.

Angular parts of Gaussian type orbitals

There are two kinds of GTOs in common use.

Cartesian GTOs

Cartesian GTOs are defined by an angular part that is a homogeneous polynomial in the components x, y, and z of the position vector r. That is,

$G_{ijk,\alpha }\equiv x^{i}\,y^{j}\,z^{k}\,e^{-\alpha r^{2}}\quad {\hbox{with}}\quad i+j+k=n.$

In general there are ${\scriptstyle {n+2 \choose n}}$ homogeneous polynomials of degree n in three variables. For instance, for n = 3 we have the following ten Cartesian GTOs,

${\begin{aligned}x^{3}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},&\;\;y^{3}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;z^{3}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;x^{2}ye^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;x^{2}ze^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;\\xy^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},&\;\;y^{2}ze^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;xz^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;yz^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}},\;\;xyze^{-\alpha r^{2}}\end{aligned}}$

Note that a set of three p-type (l = 1) atomic orbitals (see hydrogen-like atom for the meaning of p and l ) can be found as linear combinations of nine out of the ten Cartesian GTOs of degree n = 3 (recall that r² = x² + y² + z²):

${\begin{aligned}x{\big [}r^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}}{\big ]}&=(x^{3}+xy^{2}+xz^{2})e^{-\alpha r^{2}}\\y{\big [}r^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}}{\big ]}&=(x^{2}y+y^{3}+yz^{2})e^{-\alpha r^{2}}\\z{\big [}r^{2}e^{-\alpha r^{2}}{\big ]}&=(x^{2}z+y^{2}z+z^{3})e^{-\alpha r^{2}}\\\end{aligned}}$

Observe that the expressions between square brackets only depend on r and hence are spherical-symmetric. The angular parts of these functions are eigenfunctions of the orbital angular momentum operator with quantum number l = 1.

Likewise, a single s-orbital is "hidden" in a set of six orbitals of degree n = 2. The 15-dimensional Cartesian set of order n = 4 "hides" one s - and five d-orbitals. It could conceivably be assumed that these "hidden" orbitals of angular momentum quantum number l with

$l={\begin{cases}&1,3,\ldots ,n-2\quad \mathrm {odd} \;n\\&0,2,\ldots ,n-2\quad \mathrm {even} \;n\\\end{cases}}$

are an asset, i.e., are an improvement of the basis, but often they are not. They are prone to give rise to linear dependencies. The spherical kind of GTOs are less plagued by this problem.

Spherical GTOs

Cosine- and sine-type regular solid harmonics (normalized to unity) can be defined by the following matrix-vector expression

${\begin{pmatrix}^{c}R_{\ell }^{|m|}\\^{s}R_{\ell }^{|m|}\end{pmatrix}}\equiv {\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}{\begin{pmatrix}(-1)^{m}&\quad 1\\-(-1)^{m}i&\quad i\end{pmatrix}}{\begin{pmatrix}r^{\ell }Y_{\ell }^{|m|}\\r^{\ell }Y_{\ell }^{-|m|}\end{pmatrix}},\qquad m\neq 0.$

and for m = 0:

$^{c}R_{\ell }^{0}\equiv r^{\ell }Y_{\ell }^{0},$

where ${\scriptstyle Y_{\ell }^{|m|}}$ is a spherical harmonic function. For instance the functions for l = 2 are explicitly,

${\begin{matrix}^{c}R_{2}^{0}={\sqrt {\frac {5}{4\pi }}}(3z^{2}-r^{2})/2,&^{c}R_{2}^{1}={\sqrt {\frac {5}{4\pi }}}{\sqrt {3}}\,xz,&^{c}R_{2}^{2}={\sqrt {\frac {5}{4\pi }}}{\frac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {3}}\,(x^{2}-y^{2}),\\&^{s}R_{2}^{1}={\sqrt {\frac {5}{4\pi }}}{\sqrt {3}}\,yz,&^{s}R_{2}^{2}={\sqrt {\frac {5}{4\pi }}}{\sqrt {3}}\,xy.\qquad \quad \end{matrix}}$

See solid harmonics for closed expressions of regular harmonics expressed in Cartesian coordinates. If one expresses regular solid harmonics in spherical polar coordinates, the cosine-type functions contain the factor cos |m| φ and the sine-type functions sin |m| φ. Hence the name.

After this preliminary a spherical GTO is defined by either

$G_{\ell mc,\alpha }(\mathbf {r} )\equiv {}^{c}\!R_{\ell }^{m}(\mathbf {r} )e^{-\alpha r^{2}},$

or

$G_{\ell ms,\alpha }(\mathbf {r} )\equiv {}^{s}\!R_{\ell }^{m}(\mathbf {r} )e^{-\alpha r^{2}}.$

It can be proved that the 2l + 1 (orthogonal) spherical GTOs are linear combinations of the Cartesian GTOs of order n = l. That is, the spherical GTOs span a subspace of the ${\scriptstyle {n+2 \choose n}}$ dimensional Cartesian GTO space spanned by the Cartesian GTOs of order n. In fact, the spherical GTOs span the subspace orthogonal to the subpaces of l < n that—as we have seen above—are subspaces of the Cartesian GTO space.

The quantum chemical methods, for which GTOs are designed, require the calculation of numerous integrals (one- and two-electron integrals, one- through four-center integrals). In practice these integrals are computed on basis of Cartesian GTOs and then transformed to spherical GTOs. This means that numerous basis functions are discarded when spherical GTOs are used. Nevertheless they find wide application, not only because they do not become linearly dependent so soon, but also because they are eigenfunctions of orbital angular momentum, and lead therefore to well-defined selection rules (a priori rules that tell whether certain integrals will vanish). This latter property makes results of calculations based on spherical GTOs more transparent and easier to interpret.

Contracted sets

(To be continued)