World War II, air war
Air Power
The stunning success of the Luftwaffe's Stuka dive bombers in the blitzkriegs that shattered Poland in 1939 and France in 1940, proved to civilians that air power would dominate the battlefield, leaving the infantry far behind. The US Army was reluctant to draw that conclusion, but it was dumbfounded by the performance of the Stukas acting as a highly mobile, highly effective strike force--a super artillery. To defend against the Luftwaffe the Army decided to vastly expand the anti-aircraft units provided by the otherwise obsolete Coast Artillery branch. Airmen retorted the only solution was to build better planes that would shoot the Stukas down and gain control of the air. Airmen felt strongly that only they understood the enormous potential of air power, and that their vision was being held back. They dreamed of complete independence, noting that Germany's Luftwaffe and Britain's Royal Air Force (RAF) had long been disentangled from the old-fashioned, narrow-minded mud soldiers. The American people, enthusiastic about aviation in exact proportion to their fear of high-casualty trench warfare, and their love affair with modern technology, had long been supportive of a well-funded, independent air force. President Roosevelt sided with public opinion and the aviators. In 1940 he vowed to build 50,000 airplanes a year, far more than the most starry-eyed aviator had ever imagined. He gave command of the Navy to an aviator, Admiral Ernest King, with a mandate for an aviation-oriented war in the Pacific.* Roosevelt basically agreed with Robert Lovett, the civilian Assistant Secretary of War for Air, who argued, "While I
don't go so far as to claim that air power alone will win the war, I do claim the war will not be won without it."
..Wise Men 203
.db
- FDR allowed King to build up land-based naval and Marine
aviation, and seize control of the long-range bombers used in antisubmarine patrols in the Atlantic.
.dq
Roosevelt rejected proposals for complete independence for
the Air Corps, because the old-line generals and the entire Navy
were vehemently opposed. In the compromise that was reached
everyone understood that after the war the aviators would get
their independence. Meanwhile, their status was upgraded from
"Army Air Corps" to "Army Air Forces" (AAF) in June, 1941, and
they seized almost complete freedom in terms of internal
administration. Thus the AAF set up its own medical service
independent of the Surgeon General, its own WAC units, and its
own logistics system. It had full control over the design and
procurement of airplanes and related electronic gear and
ordnance. Its purchasing agents controlled 15% of the nation's
Gross National Product. Together with naval aviation, it creamed
the best young men in the nation. General Hap Arnold headed the
AAF. One of the first military men to fly, and the youngest
colonel in World War I, he selected for the most important combat
commands men who were ten years younger than their Army
counterparts, including Ira Eaker (b. 1896), Jimmy Doolittle (b.
1896), Hoyt Vandenberg (b. 1899), Elwood Queseda (b. 1904), and,
youngest of them all, Curtis LeMay (b. 1906). Although a West
Pointer, Arnold did not automatically turn to Academy men for top
positions. Since he operated without theater commanders, Arnold
could and did move his generals around, and speedily removed
3 underachievers. Aware of the need for engineering expertise, he went outside the military and formed close liaisons with top engineers like rocket specialist Theodore von Karmen at Cal Tech. Arnold was given seats on the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the US-British Combined Chiefs of Staff. Arnold, however, was officially Deputy Chief of [Army] Staff, so on committees he deferred to his boss, General Marshall. Thus Marshall made all the basic strategic decisions, which were worked out by his "War Plans Division" (WPD, later renamed the Operations Division). WPD's section leaders were infantrymen or engineers, with a handful of aviators in token positions. The AAF had its own planning division, whose advice was largely ignored by WPD. Airmen were also underrepresented in the planning divisions of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and of the Combined Chiefs. Aviators were largely shut out of the decision-making and planning process because they lacked seniority in a highly rank-conscious system. The freeze intensified demands for independence, and fueled a spirit of "proving" the superiority of air power doctrine. Because of the young, pragmatic leadership at top, and the universal glamor accorded aviators, morale in the AAF was strikingly higher than anywhere else (except perhaps Navy aviation.)*
.db
The AAF provided extensive technical training, promoted
officers and enlisted faster, provided comfortable barracks and
good food, and was safe. The only dangerous jobs were voluntary
ones as crew of fighters and bombers--or involuntary ones at
jungle bases in the Southwest Pacific.
Marshall, an infantryman uninterested in aviation before 1939, became a partial convert to air power and allowed the aviators more autonomy. He authorized vast spending on planes, and insisted that American forces had to have air supremacy before taking the offensive. However, he repeatedly overruled Arnold by agreeing with Roosevelt's requests in 1941-42 to send half of the new light bombers and fighters to the British and Soviets, thereby delaying the buildup of American air power. The Army's major theater commands were given to infantrymen MacArthur and Eisenhower. Neither had paid much attention to aviation before the war (though Ike learned to fly). By 1942 both had become air power enthusiasts, and built their strategies around the need for tactical air supremacy. MacArthur had been badly defeated in the Philippines in 1941-42 primarily because the Japanese controlled the sky. His planes were outnumbered and outclassed, his airfields shot up, his radar destroyed, his supply lines cut. His infantry never had a chance. MacArthur vowed never again. His island hopping campaign was based on the strategy of isolating Japanese strongholds while leaping past them. Each leap was determined by the range of his air force, and the first task on securing an objective was to build an airfield to prepare for the next leap.
.. Quesada 41 (1948): our doctrine = "attainment of...air supremacy as a prerequisite for a major surface campaign"
Eisenhower adopts RAF system
Eisenhower's first command was the invasion of North Africa in November, 1942, at a time when the Luftwaffe was still strong. One of Ike's corps commanders, General Lloyd Fredendall, used his planes as a "combat air patrol" that circled endlessly over his front lines ready to defend against Luftwaffe attackers. Like most infantrymen, Fredendall assumed that all assets should be used to assist the ground forces. (More concerned with defense than attack, Fredendall was soon replaced by Patton.) Likewise the Luftwaffe made the mistake of dividing up its air assets, and failed to gain control of the air or to cut Allied supplies. The RAF in North Africa, under General Arthur Tedder, concentrated its air power and defeated the Luftwaffe. The RAF had an excellent training program (using bases in Canada), maintained very high aircrew morale, and inculcated a fighting spirit. Senior officers monitored battles by radar, and directed planes by radio to where they were most needed. The RAF's success convinced Eisenhower that its system maximized the effectiveness of tactical air power; Ike became a true believer. The point was that air power had to be consolidated at the highest level, and had to operate almost autonomously. Brigade, division and corps commanders lost control of air assets (except for a few unarmed little "grasshoppers," used to spot artillery; the AAF wanted no part of that subservient role.) With one airman in overall charge, air assets could be concentrated for maximum offensive capability, not frittered away in ineffective "penny packets." Eisenhower--a tanker in 1918 who had theorized on the best way to concentrate armor--recognized the analogy. Split up among infantry in supporting roles tanks were wasted; concentrated in a powerful force they could dictate the terms of battle.
.. Luft mistake Quesada 1948 AirU
The fundamental assumption of air power doctrine was that
the air war was just as important as the ground war. Indeed, the
main function of the sea and ground forces, insisted the air
enthusiasts, was to seize forward air bases. Field Manual 100-20,
issued in July 1943, became the airman's bible for the rest of
the war, and taught the doctrine of equality of air and land
warfare. The idea of combined arms operations (air, land, sea)
strongly appealed to Eisenhower and MacArthur. Eisenhower
invaded only after he was certain of air supremacy, and he made
the establishment of forward air bases his first priority.
MacArthur's leaps reflected the same doctrine. In each theater
the senior ground command post had an attached air command post.
Requests from the front lines went all the way to the top, where
the air commander decided whether to act, when and how. This
slowed down response time--it might take 48 hours to arrange a
strike--and involved rejecting numerous requests from the
infantry for a little help here, or a little intervention there.
Tactical Doctrine
Tactical air doctrine stated that the primary mission was to turn tactical superiority into complete air supremacy--to totally defeat the enemy air force and obtain control of its air space. This could be done directly through dogfights, and raids on airfields and radar stations, or indirectly by destroying aircraft factories and fuel supplies. Anti-aircraft (called "ack- ack by the British, "flak" by the Germans, and "Archie" by the Yanks) could also play a role, but it was downgraded by most airmen. The Allies won air supremacy in the Pacific in 1943, and in Europe in 1944. That meant that Allied supplies and reinforcements would get through to the battlefront, but not the enemy's. It meant the Allies could concentrate their strike forces wherever they pleased, and overwhelm the enemy with a preponderance of firepower. This was the basic Allied strategy, and it worked. Air superiority depended on having the fastest, most maneuverable fighters, in sufficient quantity, based on well-supplied airfields, within range. The RAF demonstrated the importance of speed and maneuverability in the Battle of Britain (August, 1940), when its fast Spitfire fighters easily riddled the clumsy Stukas as they were pulling out of dives. The race to build the fastest fighter became one of the central themes of World War Two. The Japanese lost, because they never advanced beyond the Zero--a great plane in 1941, a loser in 1944. Amazingly, the Germans "won" the technical race. In the critical year of the air war, 1944, they were flying the fastest, most maneuverable most heavily armed plane of the era, the Messerschmitt 262, the first jet. (The first British jet appeared a month later; the first US jet was ready in late 1945.) However, Hitler sent the ME-262 back to the drawing boards for reconfiguration as a bomber, and it never played a major role in the war. Hitler saw airplanes only as offensive weapons, and his interference prevented the Luftwaffe from acquiring and using enough fighter planes to stop the Allied bombers. By the fall of 1944, the Luftwaffe had virtually disappered. Hitler instead emphasized ant-aircraft defenses, such as the flak batteries that surrounded all major German cities and war plants, and which consumed a large fraction of all German munitions production in the last year of the war.
.. [Cross, Bombers 102 ; Overy Air War 121
Once total air supremacy in a theater was gained the second
mission was interdiction of the flow of enemy supplies and
reinforcements in a zone five to fifty miles behind the front.
Whatever moved had to be exposed to air strikes, or else confined
to moonless nights. (Radar was not good enough for nighttime
tactical operations against ground targets.) A large fraction of
tactical air power focused on this mission.
.. Wilt 278
The third and lowest priority mission was "close air support" or direct assistance to ground units on the battlefront by blowing up bunkers, slicing through armor, and mowing down exposed infantry. Airmen disliked the mission because it subordinated the air war to the ground war; furthermore, slit trenches, camouflage, and flak guns usually reduced the effectiveness of close air support. Less than 15% of the tactical
..Futrell 174 sorties involved close air support. "Operation Cobra" in July, 1944, targeted a critical strip of 3,000 acres of German strength that held up the breakthrough out of Normandy. General Bradley, his ground forces stymied, placed his bets on air power. 1,500 heavies, 380 medium bombers and 550 fighter bombers dropped 4,000 tons of high explosives and napalm. Bradley was horrified when 77 planes bombed short:
The ground belched, shook and spewed dirt to the sky. Scores of our troops were hit, their bodies flung from slit trenches. Doughboys were dazed and frightened....A bomb landed squarely on McNair in a slit trench and threw his body sixty feet and mangled it beyond recognition except for the three stars on his collar. The Germans were stunned
.. Bradley 280 no night: 9th AF 1946 p 126 short C&C 3:234 senseless, with tanks overturned, telephone wires severed, commanders missing, and a third of their combat troops killed or wounded. The defense line broke; Joe Collins rushed his VII Corps forward; the Germans retreated in a route; the Battle of France was won; air power seemed invincible. However, the sight of a senior colleague killed by error was unnerving, and after Cobra Army generals were so reluctant to risk "friendly fire" casualties that they often passed over excellent attack opportunities. Infantrymen, on the other hand, were ecstatic about the effectiveness of close air support:
- Air strikes on the way; we watch from a top window as P-47s
dip in and out of clouds through suddenly erupting strings of
Christmas-tree lights [flak], before one speck turns over and
drops toward earth in the damnest sight of the Second World
War, the dive-bomber attack, the speck snarling, screaming,
dropping faster than a stone until it's clearly doomed to
smash into the earth, then, past the limits of belief, an
impossible flattening beyond houses and trees, an upward arch
that makes the eyes hurt, and, as the speck hurtles away,
WHOOM, the earth erupts five hundred feet up in swirling black
smoke. More specks snarl, dive, scream, two squadrons, eight
of them, leaving congealing, combining, whirling pillars of
black smoke, lifting trees, houses, vehicles, and, we devoutly
hope, bits of Germans. We yell and pound each other's backs.
Gods from the clouds; this is how you do it! You don't attack
painfully across frozen plains, you simply drop in on the
enemy and blow them out of existence.Cite error: Closing </ref>
missing for <ref>
tag
Marine Aviation: Reluctant Ground Support
The Marines had their own land-based aviation, built around the excellent Chance Vought F4U Corsair, an unusually big fighter-bomber. By 1944 10,000 Marine pilots operated 126 combat squadrons. Marine Aviation originally had the mission of close support for ground troops, but it dropped that role in the 1920s and 1930s and became a junior component of naval aviation. The new mission was to protect the fleet from enemy air attacks. Marine pilots, like all aviators, fiercely believed in the prime importance of air superiority; they did not wish to be tied down to supporting ground troops. On the other hand, the ground Marines needed close air support because they lacked heavy firepower of their own. Mobility was a basic mission of Marine ground forces; they were too lightly armed to employ the sort of heavy artillery barrages and massed tank movements the Army used to clear the battlefield. The Japanese were so well dug in that Marines often needed air strikes on positions 300 to 1,500 yards ahead. In 1944, after considerable internal acrimony, Marine Aviation was forced to start helping out. At Iwo Jima ex-pilots in the air liaison party (ALP) not only requested air support, but actually directed it in tactical detail. The Marine formula increased responsiveness, reduced "friendly" casualties, and (flying weather permitting) substituted well for the missing armor and artillery. For the next half century close air support would remain central to the mission of Marine Aviation, provoking eternal jealousy from the Army which was never allowed to operate fixed-wing fighters or bombers. ..The Army was allowed to have some unarmed transports and spotter planes. Beginning in 1965 (in Vietnam) heavily armed Army helicopter gunships were used to provide close air support.
Engineers Bulldoze New Airfields
Arnold correctly anticipated that he would have to build forward airfields in inhospitable places. Working closely with the Army Corps of Engineers, he created Aviation Engineer Battalions that by 1945 included 118,000 men. Runways, hangers, radar stations, power generators, barracks, gasoline storage tanks and ordnance dumps had to be built hurriedly on tiny coral islands, mud flats, featureless deserts, dense jungles, or exposed locations still under enemy artillery fire. The heavy construction gear had to be imported, along with the engineers, blueprints, steel-mesh landing mats, prefabricated hangars, aviation fuel, bombs and ammunition, and all necessary supplies. As soon as one project was finished the battalion would load up its gear and move forward to the next challenge, while headquarters inked in a new airfield on the maps. The engineers opened an entirely new airfield in North Africa every other day for seven straight months. Once when heavy rains along the coast reduced the capacity of old airfields, two companies of Airborne Engineers loaded miniaturized gear into 56 transports, flew a thousand miles to a dry Sahara location, started blasting away, and were ready for the first B-17 24 hours later. Often engineers had to repair and use a captured enemy airfield. The German fields were well-built all-weather operations; by contrast the Japanese installations were ramshackle affairs with poor siting, poor drainage, scant protection, and narrow, bumpy runways. Engineering was a low priority for the offense-minded Japanese, who chronically lacked adequate equipment and imagination.
.. 7:250,253]
Strategic Bombing Doctrine
The airmen, while delighted with the greatly enhanced importance of air power implied by the emphasis on tactical air supremacy, in fact had a quite different doctrine regarding how air power could best be applied. It was "strategic bombing." Do not be misled by tanks and artillery and infantry, they insisted- -that was ancient history. The war could be won hundreds or thousands of miles behind the front lines--an invasion would be unnecessary because the bombers alone could defeat Germany and Japan. Modern warfare depended upon industrial production in large, fixed, visible factories, oil refineries and electric power stations. As Lovett explained, "Our main job is to carry the war to the country of the people fighting us--to make their working conditions as intolerable as possible, to destroy their plants, their sources of electric power, their communications system." Strategic bombing was "guaranteed" to destroy those installations sooner or later. To win the war, therefore, it was necessary merely to build up a strategic air force from suitable bases. In Europe, the enemy was within attack range of B-17 bases in Britain and Italy. Matters were more complicated in the Pacific, where the Rising Sun flew above all the islands within range of Tokyo. Perhaps suitable bases could be built in China; a very-long-range bomber for those bases, the B-29, went into mass production. Closer and more secure bases could be built in the Mariana Islands (Saipan, Guam, Tinian), which therefore were invaded in June 1944.
.. Wise Men 206]
In August, 1941, the AAF devised AWPD-1, its plan to win the
war through air power alone (an appendix discussed tactical
support for an invasion, should that prove necessary.) AWPD-1
read like an engineering document, and focused on the choke
points of the German war economy. It listed 154 German targets in
order of priority (electric power, railroad yards and bridges,
synthetic oil plants, aircraft factories). By assuming half the
bombs would land within 400 yards of their targets, it concluded
that 3,800 bombers could finish the job in six months time. A
total of 62,000 combat planes, and 37,000 trainers would have to
be built. AWPD-42, completed a year later, provided more tactical
air power, proposed a detailed strategic air war against Japan,
and reaffirmed the same German targets (plus submarine yards).
The summit conference at Casablanca in January, 1943, accepted
the basic plan of AWPD-42: Germany and Japan would be the targets
of massive strategic bombing that would either force their
surrender or soften them up for an infantry invasion.
.. Hansel Japan 5-6, 12; awpd-1 Watts 19
Marshall and King did not fully accept the doctrine of strategic bombing. They insisted that control of the air would always be supplementary, and they much preferred tactical air. Furthermore, they denied that strategic bombing of the enemy's industrial strength would be decisive in warfare. Marshall accepted AWPD-1 as a blueprint for airplane acquisition and force levels (it proved astonishingly accurate), but refused to believe that strategic bombing could be decisive, noting "an almost invariable rule that only armies can win wars." Secretary of War Stimson, who usually backed Marshall 100%, disagreed this time: "I fear Marshall and his deputies are very much wedded to the theory that it is merely an auxiliary force." The debate between the AAF and the Army and Navy resulted in a compromise: both strategic and tactical air power would be used. The production of planes (AAF, Navy, Marines) was split about equally between strategic and tactical air, with 44% going to strategic bombers (especially the B-17 and B-29), 24% going to tactical ground-support and interdiction bombers (medium land-based Army and Marine, and and light carrier-based Navy planes), and 20% to fighters (which could either escort strategic bombers or be used as tactical air.) The remainder went for transports, trainers, and unarmed reconnaissance planes. Arnold kept to the compromise, and did provide Marshall with ample tactical air power, but with the proviso that his airmen would always decide on how, when and where it was to be used. In the boldest move for AAF autonomy, Arnold gained almost complete control over the strategic bombing campaigns against Japan and Germany.[1] .. Victory A/N plan 9/41 in Stoler 82; AAF STATS 125,127; airframe.wk1]
Goals and Achievements of Strategic Bombing
The American strategic bombing campaign against Germany was operated in parallel with RAF Bomber Command, which fervently believed in its own version of strategic bombing doctrine. The AAF bombed during the day, the RAF at night, when interception was difficult. Nightime navigation was so poor that the RAF quickly gave up precision bombing; their real target was the morale of the people who lived in the largest cities. According to Air Marshal Harris of RAF Bomber Command massive nightly raids would eventually burn out all the major German cities. The populace might survive in shelters, but they would be "dehoused", and lose confidence in the Fuehrer, which would lead to loss of German will to resist. Furthermore, the factories and railroad system would eventually be burned out as well. The British were willing to spend 30% of their GNP on Bomber Command, in order to weaken Germany, gain revenge, and avoid the high infantry casualties such as the Soviets were enduring.
.. Werrell 707]
Strategic bombing did "dehouse" 7.5 million Germans, but it
hardly mattered, for the target cities had a surplus of housing
(because most young men were away the army, most civilians had
evacuated to the countryside, and all Jews sent to death camps
and their apartments seized.) As the U.S. Strategic Bombing
Survey reported after the war, "Allied bombing widely and
seriously depressed German morale, but depressed as discouraged
workers were not necessarily unproductive workers." The German
civilian air defense system enrolled 22 million volunteers,
supervised by 75,000 full-time officials. Focusing on basement
shelters in residential districts in the cities, the Germans
built interconnected passageways, pained on fire retardants, and
stored emergency supplies .. Read-Fisher 58
The Gestapo, making tens of thousands of arrests, made certain that discontent was kept unfocused. Bombs did occasionally damage factories, but fast repairs were made. Rare indeed was the bomb dropped from 20,000 feet that destroyed a steel machine tool, especially when the bombadier had only the vaguest idea where it was or where he was.
.. USSBS 1:72 97
Luftwaffe's Bombing Failure
The uses made of air power depend primarily on doctrine. This is clear from the failure of the Germans, Japanese and Soviets to build long-range strategic bombers. Germany had short- range bombers, but lacking a clear doctrine of how to use them it lost the "Battle of Britain" in late summer 1940. The Luftwaffe started by successfully attacking radar stations, command posts, airfields and fighter planes--a strategy that was on the verge of gaining complete and permanent air supremacy. Hitler, enraged when the RAF bombed Berlin, ordered the Luftwaffe to switch to bombing civilians (the "Blitz"). Thousands died but British morale never faltered. The RAF rebuilt its fighter strength and soon cleared British airspace of the Luftwaffe. The Luftwaffe could bomb and strafe, but was unprepared to defend itself against Spitfires and Hurricanes. Hitler's invasion of Britain required air superiority, so it had to be canceled. On the eastern front, Hitler expected the blitzkrieg to work so quickly that strategic bombing of Russian munitions factories would be unnecessary. By the time the Luftwaffe realized the necessity of hitting those factories, reverses on the ground put them out of range.
In the Mediterranean, the Luftwaffe tried to defeat the
invasions of Sicily and Italy with tactical bombing. They failed
because the Allied air forces systematically destroyed most of
their air fields, and because by 1943 German pilots were so
poorly trained that they could scarcely handle large planes. The
Luftwaffe threw everything it had against the Salerno beachhead,
but was outgunned ten to one, and then lost the vital airfields
at Foggia.[2] After that it had only one success in Italy, a
devastating raid on the American supply depot at Bari, in
December, 1943. (Only 30 out of 100 bombers got through, but one
found an ammunition ship.) The Germans ferociously opposed the
American landing at Anzio in February, 1944, but the Luftwaffe
was outnumbered 5 to 1 and so totally outclassed in equipment and skill that it inflicted little damage. Italian air space
belonged to the Allies, and the Luftwaffe's strategic capability
was zilch.
.. Rise & Fall 88 on Britain; 250-69 on Med/Italy; Mets 6]
B-17 Flying Fortress as Strategic Weapon
The centerpiece of America's strategic bombing was the B-17. Although originally designed in 1934, it was ahead of its time and proved a highly effective heavy bomber. A policy of continuous improvements added power gun turrets, bullet-proof glass, self-sealing fuel tanks, high-altitude oxygen systems, enlarged wing and tail surfaces, better radios, and ground- scanning radar. The power plant was upgraded with turbo- superchargers and 1,200 horsepower Wright Cyclone engines operating on 100 octane fuel (and later, 110/145 grade). The service ceiling rose to 35,000 feet, the range to 3,300 miles with a 4,000 pound payload. The AAF considered B-17 the perfect embodiment of its strategic bombing doctrine because of its long- range, its ability to defend itself, and its highly accurate Norden bombsight. The Norden allowed daylight precision bombing of specific targets like factories. It worked well enough in leisurely practice runs in sunny California at 10,000 feet with no flak or enemy planes. Over German airspace, in bad weather at 20,000 feet with shells exploding all around and enemy fighters a constant threat, the B-17 had at most 30 seconds over the target. "The flak is murder," the pilots said. "If you fly straight and level through it for more than ten seconds, you're a dead duck." Furthermore, it was hard to find the target in the first place. Navigation errors often put streams of 500 bombers many miles the wrong direction. At high altitude, with the usual cloud cover, it was nearly impossible to identify urban landmarks visually. On clear nights camouflage and dummy cities confused the navigators.[3] H2X, an American adaptation of the ..8th AF Report 85 xxx check # days British radar system H2S, provided a crude mapping of the ground through cloud cover. It helped locate targets, but beginners' luck in its early trials gave planners a much exaggerated estimate of the accuracy the Flying Fortress could achieve. In late 1943, one bomber in 25 hit within one mile of the aiming point, and only one in 5 even got within five miles. If the aiming point was a factory or railroad yard, fewer than 10% of the bombs that did land there would do any real damage. Bombs that missed and landed in residential areas were just like the RAF's; they would destroy apartments, but the residents were usually safe in underground shelters.
.. C&C 3:20] LeMay told of flak, 314
General Ira Eaker's Eighth Air Force first launched its heavy
bombers against Hitler in August, 1942. The main priority until
1944 was the destruction of Luftwaffe planes in the air and on
the ground. One year later, after 83 major missions aimed at
France, Holland, and the German cities closest to the English
Channel, Eaker sent 376 B-17s against the vital ball bearing
factories at Schweinfurt and the Messerschmitt factory at
Regensburg. Both small cities were located deep in Germany, far
out of range of the P-47 and Spitfire fighters that normally
escorted the bombers. German fighters and flak downed 60 bombers-
-a half dozen more raids like that and the 8th Air Force would
cease to exist. After 30 more peripheral raids the Eighth tried
Schweinfurt again in October, and again 60 Flying Fortresses (out
of 320) were shot down. Accuracy was good despite the fierce
resistance, and damage was heavy. The Germans took several months
to rebuild (and to disperse critical plants so one raid would not
prove fatal.) An effort to knock out the oil refineries at
Ploesti, Rumania, which provided a third of Nazi oil, cost 54 out
of 177 B-24 Liberators. However, the daring raid at very low
level (100 to 300 feet) destroyed 40% of Ploesti's capacity.
German repair crews made unexpectedly speedy repairs. The lessons
were a profound blow to strategic bombing doctrines. Luftwaffe
clearly had air superiority over the Nazi heartland, unescorted
bombers would suffer unacceptably high losses, and even severe
damage could be quickly repaired.
..raids shallow until Ruhr attack on 6/43 2:676
.. C&C 2:682-7 479;
In daylight, large formations of several hundred B-17s were
easily spotted. For self-defense each Flying Fortress had 13 50-
calibre machine guns, and flew in loose formations of 6 planes,
each covering the others. In 1942-43 the Luftwaffe proved the
Fortresses were vulnerable. Unexpectedly heavy German flak
defenses disrupted formations, and damaged on average one-fourth
of the bombers in each mission. Berlin was surrounded by an outer
searchlight belt 60 miles in diameter, and a flak area 40 miles
across. The searchlights helped the guns locate their targets
and also blinded the navigators. Three massive 120-foot flak
towers resembling medieval castles protected central Berlin with
8 128mm high velocity guns each. They fired a salvo every 90
seconds that created a killing window 260 yards across in the
path of the bombers.
..Read-Fisher 77-8 on Berlin flak
Hit by flak, some bombers crashed, while others fell out of formation; the stragglers were easy prey for fighters. The Luftwaffe moved fighters from the Eastern Front to the West. Improved German radar, new airfields, and centralized ground control allowed groups of fighters to be quickly vectored into the predicted flight path of the bombers. The fighters discovered the best way to attack was head-on ("Twelve O'Clock High!") because the very fast closing speed gave the B-17 gunners only a split second to aim, while the fighter pilot could aim his machine guns by pointing his entire aircraft at the bomber. The B-17 loss rate climbed from 3.5% per sortie in 1942 to 5% in early 1943. The B-17 was a robust plane able to withstand heavy punishment, but when 5% were lost in a single mission, the life expectancy per bomber was a mere 13 missions. The Luftwaffe was winning this war of attrition. New defensive techniques included forward-firing chin turrets, tighter formations of 18 planes, and deceptive diversionary attacks; they were not enough.
.. McFarland
Destroying the Luftwaffe, 1944
In late 1943 the AAF suddenly realized the need to revise its basic doctrine: strategic bombing against a technologically sophisticated enemy like Germany was impossible without air supremacy. (The B-29 did not need escorts against Japan.) General Arnold replaced Ira Eaker with Carl Spaatz and Jimmy Doolittle, who fully appreciated the new reality. They provided fighter escorts all the way into Germany and back, and cleverly used B- 17s as bait for Luftwaffe planes, which the escorts then shot down. Doolittle's slogan was "The First Duty of 8th AF Fighters is to Destroy German Fighters." In one "Big Week" in February, 1944, American bombers protected by hundreds of fighters, flew 3,800 sorties dropping 10,000 tons of high explosives on the main German aircraft and ball-bearing factories.* [4] Paradoxically, the Luftwaffe would have to come out and attack or see its planes destroyed at the factory. Before getting at the bombers the Germans had to confront the more numerous, better armed and faster American fighters. The heavily armed BF-110 could kill a bomber, but it slowness made it easy prey for the speedy Thunderbolts and Mustangs armed with numerous fast-firing machine guns. The big, slow twin-engine Ju-88 was dangerous because it could stand further off and fire its rockets into the tight B-17 formations; but it too was hunted down. Germany's severe shortage of aviation fuel had sharply curtailed the training of new pilots, and most of the instructors had been sent into battle. Rookie pilots were rushed into combat after only 160 flying hours in training compared to 400 hours for the AAF, 360 for the RAF and 120 for the Japanese. They never had a chance against more numerous, better trained Americans flying superior planes.
.. Suchenworth 28; Sherrod 418/ussbs
The Germans began losing one thousand planes a month on the
western front (and another 400 on the eastern front). Realizing
that the best way to defeat the Luftwaffe was not to stick close
to the bombers but to aggressively seek out the enemy, Doolittle
told his Mustangs to "go hunting for Jerries. Flush them out in
the air and beat them up on the ground on the way home." On one
occasion German air controllers identified a large force of
approaching B-17s, and sent all the Luftwaffe's 750 fighters to
attack. Error. The bogeys were all Mustangs, which shot down 98
interceptors while losing 11. The actual B-17s were elsewhere,
and completed their mission without a loss. In February, 1944,
the Luftwaffe lost 33% of its frontline fighters and 18% of its
pilots; the next month it lost 56% of its fighters and 22% of the
pilots. April was just as bad, 43% and 20%, and May was worst of
all, at 50% and 25%. German factories continued to produce many
new planes, and inexperienced pilots did report for duty; but
their life expectancy was down to a couple of combat sorties.
Increasingly the Luftwaffe went into hiding; with losses down to
1% per mission, the American bombers now got through.
.. C&C 3:664 bomber.wk1 (based on USAAF)
By April, 1944, Luftwaffe tactical air power had vanished,
and Eisenhower decided he could go ahead with the invasion of
Normandy. He guaranteed the invaders that "if you see fighting
aircraft over you, they will be ours." Indeed, on D-Day Allied
aircraft flew 14,000 sorties, while the Luftwaffe managed a mere
260, mostly in defense of its own battered airfields. In the two
weeks after D-Day, the Luftwaffe lost 600 of the 800 planes it
kept in France. From April through August, 1944, both the AAF's
and the RAF's strategic bombers were placed under Eisenhower's
direction, where they were used tactically to support the
invasion. Airmen protested vigorously against this subordination
of the air war to the land campaign, but Eisenhower forced the
issue and used the bombers to simultaneously strangle Germany's
supply system, burn out its oil refineries, and destroy its
warplanes. Mission accomplished, Ike returned the bombers in
September.
..Murray 183, 207, 211; C&C 3:47
Failure of German Secret Weapons
Hitler tried to sustain morale by promising that "secret
weapons" would turn the war around. He did indeed have the weapons. The first of 9,300 V-1 flying bombs hit London in mid- June, 1944, and together with 1,300 V-2 rockets caused 8,000 civilian deaths and 23,000 injuries. Although they did not seriously undercut British morale or munitions production, they bothered the British government a great deal--Germany now had its own unanswered weapons system. Using proximity fuzes, British ack-ack gunners (many of them women) learned how to shoot down the 400 mph V-1s; nothing could stop the supersonic V-2s. The British government, in near panic, demanded that upwards of 40% of bomber sorties be targeted against the launch sites, and got its way in "Operation CROSSBOW." The attacks were futile, and the diversion represented a major success for Hitler.[5]
Every raid against a V-1 or V-2 launch site was one less raid against the Third Reich. On the whole, however, the secret weapons were still another case of too little too late. The Luftwaffe ran the V-1 program, which used a jet engine, but it diverted scarce engineering talent and manufacturing capacity that were urgently needed to improve German radar, air defense, and jet fighters. The German Army ran the V-2 program. The rockets were a technological triumph, and bothered the British leadership even more than the V-1s. But they were so inaccurate they rarely could hit militarily significant targets. Furthermore, the program used up scarce technical resources that could have gone into the development of air defense weapons like proximity fuzes and "Waterfall," a deadly ground-to-air rocket. The secret weapon of greatest threat to the Allies was the jet plane that could outfly Allied fighters and shoot down bombers. The Messerschmitt ME-262 prototype flew in 1939, but was never given high priority until too late. Hitler never understood air power; his personal interference repeatedly delayed the jets. First he proclaimed they would not be necessary, then insisted they be redesigned as bombers to make retaliation raids against London. The Luftwaffe would have been a much more deadly threat if it built ten thousand jets; it only made one thousand and they rarely flew combat missions.
.. Speer 365]
===Destroying Germany's Oil and Transportation=== Besides knocking out the Luftwaffe, the second most striking achievement of the strategic bombing campaign was the destruction of the German oil supply. Oil was essential for U-boats and tanks, while very high quality aviation gasoline was essential for piston planes.[6] Germany had few wells, and depended on imports from Russia (before 1941) and Nazi ally Romania, and on synthetic oil plants that used chemical processes to turn coal into oil. Heedless of the risk of Allied bombing, the Germans had carelessly concentrated 80% of synthetic oil production in just 20 plants. These became a top priority for the AAF and RAF in 1944, and were targets for 210,000 tons of bombs. The oil plants were very hard to hit, but also hard to repair. As graph #1 shows, the bombings dried up the oil supply in the summer of 1944. An extreme oil emergency followed, which grew worse month by month.
..check 80% 20%
graph -1 about here re oil supply
The third notable achievement of the bombing campaign was
the degradation of the German transportation system--its
railroads and canals (there was little truck traffic.) In the
two months before and after D-Day the American Liberators (B-24),
Flying Fortresses and British Lancasters hammered away at the
French railroad system. Underground Resistance fighters sabotaged
some 350 locomotives and 15,000 freight cars every month.
Critical bridges and tunnels were cut by bombing or sabotage.
Berlin responded by sending in 60,000 German railway workers, but
even they took two or three days to reopen a line after heavy
raids on switching yards. The system deteriorated quickly, and it
proved incapable of carrying reinforcements and supplies to
oppose the Normandy invasion. To that extent the assignment of
strategic bombers to the tactical job of interdiction was
successful. When Bomber Command hit German cities, it inevitably
hit some railroad yards. The AAF made railroad yards a high
priority, and gave considerable attention as well to bridges,
moving trains, ferries, and other choke points. The
"transportation policy" of targeting the railroad system came in
for intense debate among Allied strategists. It was argued that
enemy had the densest and best operated railway system in the
world, and one with a great deal of slack. The Nazis
systematically looted rolling stock from conquered nations, so
they always had plenty of locomotives and freight cars.
Furthermore, most traffic was "civilian," and urgent troop train
traffic would always get through. The critics exaggerated the
resilience of the German system. As wave after wave of bombers
blasted away, repairs took longer and longer. Delays became
longer and more frustrating. Yes, the troop trains usually got
through, but the "civilian" traffic that did not get through
comprised food, uniforms, medical equipment, horses, fodder,
tanks, fuel, howitzers, flak shells and machine guns for the
front lines, and coal, steel, spare parts, subassemblies, and
critical components for munitions factories. By January, 1945,
the transportation system was cracking in dozens of places, and
front-line units had more luck trying to capture Allied weapons
than waiting for fresh supplies of their own.
Unanswered Weapons Systems
Germany and Japan were burned out and lost the war in large part because of strategic bombing. Targeting became somewhat more accurate in 1944, but the real solution to inaccurate bombs was more of them. The AAF dropped 3.5 million bombs (500,000 tons) against Japan, and 8 million (1.6 million tons) against Germany.[7]
One fourth of the German war economy was neutralized because of direct bomb damage, the resulting delays, shortages and roundabout solutions, and the spending on anti-aircraft, civil defense, repair, and removal of factories to safer locations. The raids were so large and so often repeated that in city after city the repair system broke down. In 1944 the bombing prevented the full mobilization of the German economic potential. Speer and his staff were brilliant in improvising solutions and work-arounds, but their challenge became more difficulty every week as one backup system after another broke down. By March, 1945, most of Germany's factories, railroads and telephones had stopped working; troops, tanks, trains and trucks were immobilized. With all their great cities crumbling into rubble, with the awareness the Allies had a weapons system they could not answer, Germans suddenly realized they were going to lose the war. In February, 1945, General Marshall overruled the ethical objections of Air Force commanders and ordered a terror attack on Berlin. It was designed to help the Soviet advance and to convince the Nazis their cause was hopeless; 2,900 died (both sides exaggerated the total to 25,000 for propaganda purposes.) Josef Goebbels, Hitler's bloodthirsty propaganda minister, was disconsolate when his beautiful ministry buildings were totally burned out: "The air war has now turned into a crazy orgy. We are totally defenseless against it. The Reich will gradually be turned into a complete desert." By July, 1945, Japan was almost totally shut down. The American and British airmen had achieved the goals of strategic bombing--but neither Berlin nor Tokyo would surrender. The Nazis quit when the Soviets smashed Berlin in the bloodiest battle of the war. The Japanese surrender will be considered below.
.. Richard G Davis, "Operation Thunderclap" J Strat St (Mar 1991) 14:90-111
Strategic Bombing of Japan
The flamability of Japan's large cities, and the concentration of munitions production there, made strategic bombing the war-winning weapon. Two months before Pearl Harbor Chinese leader Chiang Kai-shek proposed sending Flying Fortresses over Tokyo and Osaka, "whose paper and bamboo houses would go up in smoke if subjected to bombing raids." Massive efforts (costing $4.5 billion dollars) to establish air bases in China failed. Hundreds of thousands of Chinese peasants broke rocks with little hammers and dug drainage ditches by hand. Shipping supplies around the world to equip the bases was almost impossible, and when some bases were ready in 1944 the Japanese Army simply moved overland and captured them. The Marianas, captured in June 1944, gave a close secure base, and the B-29 gave the Americans the weapon they needed. The B-29 represented the highest achievement of traditional (pre-jet) aeronautics. Its four 2,200 horsepower Wright R-3350 supercharged engines could lift four tons of bombs 3,500 miles at 33,000 feet (high above Japanese flak or fighters). Computerized fire-control mechanisms made its 13 guns exceptionally lethal against fighters. However, the systematic raids that began in June, 1944, were unsatisfactory, because the AAF had learned too much in Europe; it overemphasized self-defense. Arnold, in personal charge of the campaign (bypassing the theater commanders) brought in a new leader, brilliant, indefatigable, hard-charging General Curtis LeMay. In early 1945, LeMay ordered a radical change in tactics: remove the computers and machine guns, fly in low at night. (Much fuel was used to get to 30,000 feet; it could now be replaced with more bombs.) The Japanese radar, fighter, and anti-aircraft systems were so ineffective that they could not hit the bombers. Fires raged through the cities, and millions of civilians fled to the mountains. Tokyo was hit repeatedly, and suffered a fire storm in March that killed 83,000. On June 5, 51,000 buildings in four miles of Kobe were burned out by 473 B- 29s; Japanese ooposition was fierce, as 11 B-29s went down and 176 were damaged. Osaka, where one-sixth of the Empire's munitions were made, was hit by 1,733 tons of incendiaries dropped by 247 B-29s. A firestorm burned out 8.1 square miles, including 135,000 houses; 4,000 died. The police reported:
Although damage to big factories was slight, approximately one-fourth of some 4,000 lesser factories, which operated hand-in-hand with the big factories, were completely destroyed by fire.... Moreover, owing to the rising fear of air attacks, workers in general were reluctant to work in
the
factories, and the attendance fluctuated as much as 50 percent. Munitions output plummeted, and by July, 1945,
.. Bauer 648 ussbs #42 p 92 in Japan-1.pco Kobe: Ugaki diary 627 [Morison]
Japan no longer had an industrial base. The problem was that it
still had an Army, which was not based in the cities, and was
largely undamaged by the raids. The Army was short of food and
gasoline, but, as Iwo Jima and Okinawa proved, was capable of
ferocious resistance.
Why the Atomic Bomb?
Why did the US drop the atomic bomb? Historians have puzzled over the problem for years. On the one hand, Japan was clearly defeated and wanted to surrender. After sifting through the records and cross-examining Japanese leaders, the experts of the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey concluded in 1946 that Japan would have surrendered by the end of 1945 because of the devastation wrought by the sea/air blockade and the incessant B-29 and carrier raids. The Survey lends weight to the retrospective conclusion that the atomic bomb did not have to be used to gain victory. Some "revisionists" have suggested Hiroshima was supposed to be an unmistakable signal to Stalin to play along diplomatically with the Americans who planned to rule the postwar world. Many have asked whether some sort of demonstration explosion should have been made, in order to frighten Tokyo without killing so many people. The option was considered, but with only two bombs available Truman decided instead to drop millions of leaflets upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki warning people to leave immediately, and at the Potsdam Conference he explicitly warned Japan it must surrender immediately or be hit with terrible force.
The civilian government in Tokyo wanted peace on conditional
terms, but that was impossible because of Roosevelt's policy of
"unconditional" surrender, and because the civilians did not
control Japan's decisions--the Army did (in the name of the
Emperor.) It is often assumed that Hiroshima caused Japan to
surrender. Perhaps; but simultaneously the Soviet Union declared
war, invaded Manchuria, and crushed the Japanese army there. This
ended Japan's feeble hopes for a negotiated peace and proved
conclusively that the Army could no longer defend the nation.
Even after Hiroshima and the invasion of Manchuria the Army and
Navy wanted to fight on, while the civilians wanted to give up.
The decisive move was the unprecedented intervention of Emperor
Hirohito, who opened negotiations. With Roosevelt gone, the
Americans redefined "unconditional" to allow continuance of the
Emperor. Hirohito then broadcast an order to the nation and its
armed forces to surrender, which was immediately obeyed.
Military Opposition to A-Bomb
No military ethic will support the use of atomic bombs on
the civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki--the military value of
those targets was simply too small. (Both had once been major
military ports, but by midsummer no ships were moving.) However,
it would be incorrect to conclude that the American generals were
the "guilty" party: they considered use of the atomic bomb on
cities to be immoral, and opposed its use.Cite error: Closing </ref>
missing for <ref>
tag Stimson and Truman, however, overruled Marshall and decided that the first two bombs would be used on cities in order to demonstrate the awesome power of the Allied forces.
Stimson the Decisive Player with a Deep Vision
President Harry S. Truman, who had been completely frozen out of decision making and secret information before he suddenly became President in April, did not know what he wanted to do. He lurched this way then that, depending on who talked to him last. The man who talked to him last about the bomb was Henry Stimson. Stimson rarely participated in strategic planning, but he had one card up his sleeve--the atomic bomb. To build it he set up the Manhattan Project. It was managed by General Leslie Groves (Corps of Engineers) with a staff of reservists and many thousands of civilian scientists and engineers. Nominally Groves reported directly to Marshall, but in fact Stimson was in charge. Stimson secured the necessary money and approval from Roosevelt and from Congress, and made sure Manhattan had the highest priorities. He controlled all planning for the use of the bomb, overruling the high command of the Army, Navy and AAF in the process. He wanted "Little Boy" (the Hiroshima bomb) dropped within hours of its earliest possible availability. And it was. Stimson wanted Japan to surrender, and thought the Hiroshima bomb on August 6 would provide the final push Tokyo needed. When nothing seemed to happen he had Truman drop "Fat Man" on Nagasaki on August 9. The Japanese offered to surrender on August 10.
In retrospect it seems likely that Japan would have
surrendered soon even without the atomic bombs (though not
without large nbumbers of Japanese casualties.) But Stimson saw
well beyond the immediate end of the war. He was the only top
government official who tried to predict the meaning of the
atomic age--he envisioned a new era in human affairs. For a half
century he had worked to inject order, science, and moralism into
matters of law, of state, and of diplomacy. His views had seemed
outdated in the age of total warfare, but now he held what he
called "the royal straight flush." The impact of the atom, he
foresaw, would go far beyond military concerns to encompass
diplomacy and world affairs, as well as business, economics and
science. Above all, said Stimson, this "most terrible weapon
ever known in human history" opened up "the opportunity to bring
the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our
civilization can be saved." That is, the very destructiveness of
the new weaponry would shatter the ages-old belief that wars
could be advantageous. It might now be possible to call a halt to
the use of destruction as a ready solution to human conflicts.
Indeed, society's new control over the most elemental forces of
nature finally "caps the climax of the race between man's growing
technical power for destructiveness and his psychological power
of self-control and group control--his moral power."
In 1931, when Japan invaded Manchuria Stimson, then
Secretary of State, proclaimed the famous "Stimson Doctrine." It
said no fruits of illegal aggression would ever be recognized by
the United States. Japan just laughed. Now the wheels of
justice had turned and the "peace-loving" nations (as Stimson
called them) had the chance to punish Japan's misdeeds in a
manner that would warn aggressor nations never again to invade
their neighbors. To validate the new moral order, the atomic
bomnb had to be used against civilians. Indeed, the Japanese
people since 1945 have been intensely anti-militaristic, pointing
with anguish to their experience at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was
Stimson then guilty of a crime (as many Japanese now believe)?
Perhaps, but it has to be recognized that he moved the issue to a
higher plane than one of military ethics. The question was not
one of whether soldiers should use this weapon or not. Involved
was the simple issue of ending a horrible war, and the more
subtle and more imp[ortant question of the possibility of genuine
peace among nations. Stimson's decision involved the fate of
mankind, and he posed the problem to the world in such clear and
articulate fashion that there was near unanimous agreement mankind had to find a way so that atomic weapons would never be
used again. Thanks in great part to Stimson's vision, they never
have been used since August of 1945.
Ethics debate on Strategic Bombing
During the war prewar pacifists and a few churchmen (especially Catholics troubled over the bombing of Catholic cities like Rome and Cologne) began to question the morality of bombing cities. After Hiroshima the issue focused on the atomic bomb, with much of the discussion echoing the fears of the interwar period about flotillas of enemy bombers dropping poison gas on New York City. This time the technology was capable of mass destruction; everyone had genuine fears of a nuclear war that would kill tens of millions of Americans within minutes. Only the United States had ever used atomic weapons--and in both cases the victims were civilian populations of another race. Was the bomb [Many of the top soldiers thought the atomic bomb was unnecessary--that their particular strategy would have won the war eventually. Each of the alternative strategies, however (such as the Army invasion of Kyushu and Honshu, the Navy's tight blockade, the Air Force's relentless firebombing) would have produced more American casualties--and probably far more Japanese killed. Some historians, starting form the assumption that the bomb was "unnecessary" have speculated that it must therefore have been used for some motivation other than military victory. Perhaps the bureaucratic dynamics of the Manhattan Project were such that the bomb had to be dropped to prove the expenditures on it were not wasted? This was highly unlikely, since Truman would not have been blamed for expenditures that took place before he took charge. Other historians suggest that the bomb was dropped in order to influence or frighten the Russians, or perhaps to keep them out of the war. In fact the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House had been begging the Russians to enter the war, and at no time did Truman ever suggest to Stalin that in fact his entry into the Pacific war was unnecessary or unwanted. As for frighteneing the Russians, that seems unlikely too. Truman and Stimson knew that Russia had the capability of building their own bomb; unleashing the American weapon was less likely to frighten the dedicated Communists than to divert them from peaceful recovery into a new arms race.
Was it necessary? Did unleashing the nuclear genie doom the human race to the risk of eventual annihilation? Were Americans so fascinated with technology that they had lost sight of the moral dimensions of their behavior? Were the American conventional bombing campaigns against cities inherently immoral?
Targets Fought Back
In evaluating the strategic bombing campaigns it is important to keep in mind what the targets were. The AAF (and the RAF) concentrated on the largest 75 to 100 cities in Germany and Japan. In Germany the targeted cities contained 25 million people before the war; the damage was done primarily in 1944-45 when at least 5 million people had evacuated. Of all 75 million civilians in Germany, 1/2 of one percent (300,000) were killed, another 1% were injured, 10% were dehoused, 25% deprived of gas, water and electricity for varying periods, and 100% were inconvenienced by fear, shortages and disruptions. The bombing campaigns did not
.. USSBS 1:72, 95 target civilians outside large cities, or their food supplies. (Tactical air sometimes did strafe passenger trains; the pilots could not tell whether they carried civilians or soldiers.) The main emphasis was on large cities for several reasons. Pragmatically, the target had to be large enough to hit. Small cities or factories in the forests were extremely hard to bomb from high altitude. Big bombers flew high when it was discovered the risk from flak was near 100% at 8,000 feet, but "only" 25% at 20,000 feet. Even at great height bombers often had to zigzag and rush their bombing run lest the ground crews get their range. The RAF noticed that when flak was light, 41% of its bombs hit near the target, compared to only 32% when flak was heavy. The Luftwaffe had figured out the logic of strategic bombing, and by late 1944 used over one million men and women to operate 16,000 heavy (high altitude) guns, 50,000 light guns, 7,500 searchlights, and 1,500 barrage baloons. The extremely critical synthetic oil plants at Leuna, Ludwigshaven and elsewhere were ringed by scores of batteries each with 8 to 12 guns. The 600 guns guarding Cologne could hurl 80 tons of shells skyward every minute. The best response was to saturate the defenses by putting as many bombers over target as quickly as possible. For every
.. W&F 4:211] AA.pco; 8th AF 87-8] 16,000 Futtrell 1:155; Rise Fall 285, 356 100 sorties in 1944, 25 bombers were hit by flak; most managed to hold formation and return--stragglers usually crashed or were shot down by fighters. The Pentagon did not see enemy cities as mere passive housing tracks filled with innocent civilians but rather as the nerve centers of warmaking and as active fortresses that fought back vigorously and which often inflicted more damage than they received. ** Some raids caused "firestorms," notably Hamburg and Kassel in 1943, Dresden and Tokyo in 1945. Firestorms were very hard to start; they occurred in unpredictable situations when a number of scattered fires suddenly combined into a tornado-like inferno which sucked up all the oxygen (including the oxygen in underground shelters). At Hamburg 40,000 people suffocated inside shelters. Tens of thousands died in Dresden, but the railway yards, munitions factories and military bases were mostly undamaged. At Hamburg, full factory production resumed in a matter of weeks, but over one million civilians fled the city.
.. RAF Bomber Diary 414 663
Ludwigshaven
Typical was the case of Ludwigshaven, a city of 150,000 population on the Rhine River near Heidelberg. Its two giant I.G. Farben plants, covering 1200 acres and employing 40,000 workers, produced much of Germany's ammonia, synthetic rubber, synthetic oil and other vita chemicals; its railroad yards were important too, and hundreds of small shops and factories produced war materials, such as diesel engines for submarines. The Luftwaffe ringed it with 180 high-powered flak guns. Thirteen thousand Allied bombers hit the city in 121 separate raids during the war, of which 56 succeeded in hitting the Farben plant. Those 56 raids dropped 53,000 bombs each containing 250 to 4,000 pounds of high explosives, plus 2.5 million 4-pound magnesium incendiary bombs. (The bombers also dropped millions of warning leaflets, plus counterfeit ration coupons.) Clouds (or protective smoke) usually covered the target, so "pathfinder" planes identified the general vicinity with flares, and the bombardiers unloaded on the flares. This sort of "area bombing" was not especially accurate: out of 1,700 bombs dropped on January 7, 1944, only 127 hit the Farben plank. On average, 1.4 tons of bombs hit each acre of the Farben complex (but buildings covered only 25% of the ground, so most hit open land.) Bombing accuracy improved with experience; in a January, 1945, raid, 1,000 high explosive bombs and 10,000 incendiaries fell within the factory fences, starting 10 large, 30 medium and 200 small fires. Bombs that missed the factory that day ruined 354 residences and dehoused 1,800 people. The shelter system worked well, for only five people on the ground were killed. By war's end most dwellings were destroyed or damaged; 1,800 people had died, and 3,000 were injured. Local Nazi officials assisted the homeless and tried to incite the residents to hate the Allies. Most residents were fatalistic or passive, and were instead inclined to blame Berlin for their troubles. Thousands fled to villages or farms, but enough stayed behind to keep producing chemicals and to assist troop transports moving by rail to the battle of the Bulge. When draft calls removed German men, I. G. Farben replaced them with German women, with civilian "volunteers" from France or Italy, and with Polish and Russian prisoners. The foreigners worked to avoid death from starvation; the Nazis treated them brutally, and were negligent about their safety during the air raids. Systematic air attacks began in earnest in early 1944, and reduced production by half that year. Repairs took longer and longer, as spare parts were difficult to find. By December, so much damage had been done to vital utilities that output dropped to nearly zero. Followup raids every week ended production permanently. On March 1, 1945, infantry from Alexander Patch's Seventh Army ended Ludwigshaven's agony by seizing the city and liberating the slave laborers.
.. Bomber Command War Diaries 648; Sorge 99 USSBS 1:58 (explosives--> 0;
..USSBS L-Oppau report (1947); coupons = 86; Germans got better shelters; foreigners
..often given slit trenches 69; guns 59; 1-7-44 p 12 also #194 v1-2 used; 117 Ludwigshafen-Oppau Works of I G Farbenindustrie A G, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Target Cities Critical to War Effort
The large cities were prime targets because they contained most of the enemy's munitions factories, railroad yards, government offices and communications centers. According to Air Force doctrine, only a small fraction of the enemy population was targeted for attack--notably the centers of war production, communications, command and control. Civilians were repeatedly warned (by billions of leaflets) to evacuate those cities, or else they would be considered as willing participants in the enemy war effort. Without its cities, an enemy army would lose its munitions supply and its power of movement. As early as 1916, and certainly by the 1930s, it was a well-recognized concept that "civilians" who worked in munitions factories were as much a part of the war effort as soldiers in the front lines, and were legitimate targets. The munitions workers themselves felt that way, as they glanced at posters or listened to speeches from visiting dignitaries telling them how essential they were to the war. They were "non-peaceable" civilians.** The next chapter will explore at length how the efforts of civilian munitions workers in the cities across the globe were largely responsible for deciding who would win the war. Churchill strongly protested Eisenhower's plans to bomb French railroads before D-Day, warning that many Frenchmen would be killed (and therefore France would never trust Britain again.) Eisenhower insisted, and so too did Charles DeGaulle. He wanted his homeland liberated! MacArthur, however, refused to allow bombing of Manila in 1945 because the Filipinos were American subjects.
Primary responsibility for saving the lives of people in the cities was held by the defending government, not by the attacking one according the US Air Force then (and now). Every government did in fact promote civil defense by installing sirens, building bomb shelters, teaching first-aid, assigning fire-fighters and rescue workers, establishing aid stations and support agencies, and training city dwellers on what to do when a raid was imminent. (The British took advantage of this by sending wooden Mosquito bombers over Berlin every night--6,000 sorties in all; their light bombs did little damage but the sirens and rush to shelters ruined every Berliner's sleep.)
Peaceable Civilians Evacuated
In World War Two, bombing raids were not a sudden and totally annihilating event. Anyone who wanted to be a peaceable civilian and avoid the risk of air attack could and should have left the major cities. The major nations realized this and encouraged evacuation. A year before the Blitz began the British evacuated a million and a half women, children and elderly from London. Japan and Germany evacuated non-essential civilians from their cities as well. Japan moved ten million people to the countryside, including two-thirds of the residents of the Tokyo and the five other largest cities. In Cologne, 90% of the small children were removed. Artistic treasures were safeguarded in old mines, and architectural monuments were sandbagged and given special fire protection. (The thousand-year old Cologne Cathedral thus remained standing while the rest of the city was flattened.) As for morality of bombing innocent civilians, the American position was, and is, that the local government, not the US, is responsible for protecting its civilians. If they are innocent they should be evacuated to the safe countryside. Time and again the Nazis tried to evacuate women and children from Berlin; German husbands and fathers resisted. Finally in August, 1943, as the RAF raids increased in intensity, the government removed 1.5 million children and adults not engaged in war work. Simultaneously hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war and foreign "volunteers" were moved into Berlin and other major cities to work in the munitions factories. ..Read-Fisher 120-1 e With the coming of of hydrogen bombs in the mid 1950s and intercontinental missiles in the early 1960s, cities became defenseless, for they could be annihilated within minutes, with no warning and no chance for evacuation. But that was not the case in World War Two.[8]
Total Mobilization of Civilians
In January 1943, Berlin decreed the full mobilization of every German. Civilian jobs not essential to the war effort were to be abolished. Hitler declared "total war. Goebbels intensified the propaganda barrage, and the Nazi Party, the Gestapo and the SS turned the screws. As Field Marshal von Rundstedt proclaimed:
- The Fuhrer has decreed: that our conduct of war must become fanatical since the battle has touched German soil along broad sectors, and German cities and villages are being turned into battlegrounds....Every bunker, every block in a German city, and every German village must be turned into a fortress against which the enemy will either bleed to death or its garrison be buried in man-to-man combat.
All civilian men became liable for militia duty in the Volkssturm, and in 1945 many fought in the last ditches. In Japan, total mobilization had been declared as early as 1938 (when Japan was fighting China): "We must mobilize our entire resources, both physical and spiritual; it is not enough merely to provide sufficient munitions." Civilians were more tightly organized on behalf of the state than in any other nation, and American policy makers concluded there were no peaceable civilians in Japan. The AAF policy said that deliberate killing of innocent civilians was immoral, but that in Germany and Japan all workers "voluntary or involuntary" were assisting the enemy and should accept the risks "which must be the lot of any individual who participates directly in the war effort of a belligerent nation"
..Crane quoting Anderson dep cmdr ops; Schaffer 142
..9-21-44 proclamation Steinert, Hitler's War 279, 187ff
..Havens 12, 61 75 91
Speer figured out the antidote to air raids in 1943--
disperse critical factories outside the major cities. The V-1 and
V-2 missiles were built in caves and underground factories that
were largely immune from bombs. However, many local Nazi leaders,
fearful that Speer's plans to build new factories in their
villages would attract air raids, dragged their feet and
effectively sabotaged Speer's program. Dispersal, furthermore,
made the Germans even more reliant on their fragile
transportation system. With railroad yards hit every week, it
took longer and longer for parts to reach underground assembly
factories, and it became more and more difficult to move the
final product to the front lines. The Japanese built airplane
components in thousands of small shops scattered about their
major cities; they did not use their small towns and villages.
The U.S. Air Force answered the dispersion by burning out entire
large cities (while avoiding the small towns and villages.) The
Soviets carried dispersion to the logical extreme. As the
Germans pushed east in 1941-42, the Russians loaded trains full
of blueprints, engineers, skilled craftsmen, critical materials,
vital parts, and necessary tools, and set up shop in makeshift
quarters in the Urals. Often the new quarters lacked heat and
the workers froze in place. A complete dispersal outside the
major cities could indeed drastically limited the direct damage
done by strategic bombing. However, dispersal to small, remote
locations with poor transportation and communications created
extremely complex management problems. It slowed everything down
and multiplied the difficulties of overall coordination, of
recruiting, training and housing workers, of supplying fuel and
raw materials, of cross-shipping of sub-assemblies, and of final
shipment to the front line soldiers. Postwar analysts in the
U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey who stressed the unexpectedly small
amount of damage done to individual plants overlooked the vast
damage done to the German and Japanese system of providing
munitions to the battlefront. Germany ground forces fought hard,
but after the summer of 1944 they were defeated in every battle,
in large part because they had lost control of their airspace,
and because strategic bombing cut the front lines off from their
industrial base.
.. Speer 287 Overy 122
Revenge and racism played a role in the bombings. The
American public demanded revenge for Pearl Harbor, and saw the
Japanese as moral subhumans. (However Americans also proudly went
to war to defend the morally worthy Filipinos and Chinese.) The
British, having watched fifty thousand civilians die from the
Blitz, were more than pleased to retaliate ten times over.
Strategic bombing doctrine had always held with enough pounding,
enemy morale would collapse and they would be forced to
surrender. That is indeed what happened with Japan. The Germans
surrendered only after Berlin was captured, but the ability to
resist invasion had been blasted away by the Allied bombings that
Germany was helpless to stop. The following chapter explores the
morale issue and the ways in which the German and Japanese
behind-the-lines war effort fell apart. The bottom line
regarding strategic bombing in World War Two is that it was the
only way a total war could be fought and won. The alternatives
were compromise with the Nazis and Japanese, or invasions that
would have killed far more people in Japan (and did kill far more
Germans than the bombings did).<ref>Lacking strategic bombers, the Russians relied on their ground
forces to capture Berlin in April, 1945. It was the bloodiest
battle of the war. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were
killed, along with very large numbers of civilians.<ref>
Bibliography
- ↑ Nimitz and MacArthur, therefore, shared control of the Pacific war with Arnold in Washington, while Eisenhower shared control of the European war with Arnold. Secretary of War Stimson, however, trumped them all when he kept control of the atomic bomb in his own hands.
- ↑ Foggia became the major base of the 15th Air Force. Its 2,000 heavy bombers hit Germany from the south while the 4,000 heavies of the 8th Air Force used bases in Britain, along with 1,300 RAF heavies. While bad weather in the north often canceled raids, sunny Italian skies allowed for more action. USAAF Stat 45:85-6 N&F 4:428 1600 3/45 1000 in 1944
- ↑ Cloud cover over Germany averaged 50-80%. In winter, a severe storm occurred every three days; early morning fog covered airfields in England every third morning. In 1944, the 8th Air Force was able to fly from Britain on only 200 days.
- ↑ The US suffered 2,600 casualties, with a loss of 137 bombers and 21 fighters. Ball bearing production was unaffected, as Nazi munitions boss Albert Speer repaired the damage in a few weeks; he even managed to double aircraft production. Sensing the danger, Speer began dispersing production into numerous small, hidden factories. ..C&C 3:43-6
- ↑ In early 1943 the strategic bombers were directed against U- boat pens, which were easy to reach and which represented a major strategic threat to Allied logistics. However, the pens were very solidly built--it took 7,000 flying hours to destroy one sub there, about the same effort that it took to destroy one-third of Cologne. The antisubmarine campaign thus was a victory for Hitler. .. W+F 4:24
- ↑ Jet planes ran on cheap kerosene, and rockets used plain alcohol; the railroad system used coal, which was in abundant supply.
- ↑ The RAF expended about the same tonnage against Germany; Navy and Marine bombs against Japan are not included, nor are the two atomic bombs. While it can be calculated that strategic bombing cost the US and Britain more money than it cost Germany, that calculation is irrelevant. The Allies had plenty of money. The cost of the US tactical and strategic air war against Germany was 18,400 planes lost in combat, 51,000 dead, 30,000 POWs, and 13,000 wounded. Against Japan, the AAF lost 4,500 planes, 16,000 dead, 6,000 POWs, and 5,000 wounded; Marine Aviation lost 1,600 killed, 1,100 wounded. Naval aviation lost several thousand dead. .. USAAF stat 50, 237-9 254
- ↑ The peaceable civilians had the knowledge and opportunity to get out, and most of them did so. If anyone missed the message from their own government, they could not fail to catch one of the hundreds of millions of leaflets dropped by Allied planes warning them that a real raid was imminent and they should evacuate immediately. In late 1944 American intelligence discovered that in Berlin, "Evacuation has been very thorough and the city now is relatively empty." In peacetime, Berlin had four million population; now it had scarcely one million, many of them foreign forced laborers.