Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft

From Citizendium
< Talk:Telephone newspaper
Revision as of 22:40, 3 May 2007 by imported>Larry Sanger (Talk:Telephone Newspaper moved to Talk:Telephone newspaper: See talk; move it back if I'm mistaken)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Article Checklist for "Telephone newspaper/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Engineering Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Bruce M.Tindall

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Approval Area

Toapprove.png
Russell Potter has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Media Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on May 11, 2007.

This article is being nominated by an editor using the Individual Editor approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:10, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Approval?

Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)

Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at telephone newspaper (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --Larry Sanger 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)