CZ:Professionalism

The Citizendium differs significantly from other online communities in its low tolerance for incivility and disruption. It is essential, for there to be efficient content production and motivated contributors, that authors (i.e., everyone playing the author role) treat each other, and each other's work, respectfully.

The importance of civility to the success of this project is such that uncivil and disruptive behavior can be quite quickly punished with banning. See Constabulary Blocking Procedures.

Use the talk page

A great many problems could be avoided if people were to use the "talk" pages--i.e., the pages you arrive at by pressing the "discussion" tab--before making any potentially controversial changes.

Rudeness

The victims of ongoing bad treatment, such as rudeness or personal attacks, do not have to tolerate this behavior. This is not behavior we would tolerate from our fellows in a face-to-face situation; we will not tolerate it on the Citizendium, either.

What behaviors are rude?

There are several obvious cases of rude behavior. Indeed, some of these are "Offenses which will result in an immediate ban" in our Constabulary Blocking Procedures:

• Extremely offensive insults or personal attacks; direct and harsh attacks on the moral character, or personal or professional credibility, of a project member in good standing; or any application of particularly crude and vulgar epithets ("four letter words") to project members in good standing. It does not matter whether these attacks are made using Citizendium resources or other resources.
• Threats, either of physical harm or of other egregious aggression, whether against an individual or a group of individuals.

Other cases are "Offenses which will result in a warning first, then a ban":

• Insults or personal attacks, on talk pages or other open forums, that are relatively mild, but which are still definitely objectionable on grounds that they aggressively impugn the moral character, or personal or professional credibility, of a project member in good standing. It does not matter whether these attacks are made using Citizendium resources or other resources.
• Disrespectful characterization of others' work on talk pages or other open forums. Note, mere criticism of a position or a forceful reply does not necessarily qualify as disrespectful; objectionable language has an implication of personal criticism, or can be reasonably taken to have such an implication.

How to respond to uncivil behavior

For example, characterizing a position as "nonsense" or "ill-informed" is disrespectful. It is much preferable to couch criticisms in a way that will not provoke a defensive reaction, such as "I have to disagree" or "I've never heard that claim before."

How not to respond

Most of us are polite, so much so that we are willing to put up with considerable abuse without much of a reaction. It is too easy to be inured to such treatment and tolerate it uncomplainingly, or learn to respond in kind. We wish to nip the problem in the bud, however. It is essential that, rather than escalating the situation, you report your difficult situation to the constabulary (a mail to constables@citizendium.org will do the trick), and respond to poor behavior collegially. Please do "take the law into your own hands" by criticizing others for their poor behavior. Constables may replace criticism, even perfectly justifiable criticism, with the {{nocomplaints}} template, which reads:

A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.