User:Larry Sanger

Hi there! Larry Sanger here. I'm the Editor-in-Chief of the Citizendium. I am also currently, and temporarily, serving as Chair of the Editorial Council. If you have a question, I'll try to answer, but you might want to try the Forums first if I don't answer instantly. I'm happy to report that I'm extremely busy! You can join my shameful backlog of e-mail at sanger <at> citizendium <dot> org.

You can read more about me at my personal home page. I have a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Ohio State and a passion for Irish traditional music. I was born in the Seattle area and grew up in Anchorage, Alaska.

I do not claim any sort of editorship other than being Editor-in-Chief, I'm afraid, not even in philosophy or the Internet. I am too long out of doing any serious research. (Although this is changing!)

I've worked on many articles, but I wrote significant parts (or all) of: John Doherty (fiddler), philosophy, Ship of Theseus problem, and epistemology. None are done yet!

There's a CZ article about me which I have not edited.  ;-)

<-- you can use this if you want

Note, this big box of information is generated by just one line of code! Find out how.

Larry Sanger Status    last updated January 22    [edit plan here] Get your own infobox! • Group Status ~ Plans ~ Short term plans 1. Finish drafting dispute resolution plan. 2. Start auto-newsletter. 3. Plan for a late January/February open house. 4. Consider hiring a part-time coder to take care of a long laundry list of small technical improvements. Longer-term plans 1. Draft the Citizendium Charter and get it accepted. 2. Spearhead workgroup list revision effort. 3. Find a replacement Editor-in-Chief. 4. Find a suitable academic home for CZ? ~ Roles and notes ~ Roles in the system 1. Editor-in-Chief 2. Editorial Personnel Administrator 3. Editorial Council, nonvoting member 4. Whipping Boy  ;-) Notes to self The problem isn't knowing what the meaning, or purpose, of life is. The problem is knowing which of the many attractive purposes are most important. Public notes : If you're interested in this new feature and plan, see CZ:Userinfo System. Discuss it on CZ talk:Userinfo System.   Philosophy Workgroup    Status    last updated Jan. 21    [edit plan here] ~ Plans ~ My short-term plans 1. Monitor recent changes in philosophy. My longer-term plans 1. Get philosophy editors started (finally!). 2. Review philosophy core articles. 3. Finish philosophy! (And other articles.) ~ Roles and Notes ~ My roles 1. author (for now) 2. unofficial workgroup organizer My notes Click edit above to start these notes Public notes: I hope to get the Philosophy Workgroup moving forward in an interesting new way, along with many other workgroups, in the coming months. Do less yet achieve more. Useful links for Userinfo System development edit Instructions: CZ:Userinfo System - CZ:Userinfo System Documentation Group and workgroup tables: CZ:Group Status (demo) - CZ:Anthropology Workgroup/Status (demo) Group table technical innards: Template:GroupInfoTable - Template:GroupInfoTableLine - Template:GroupInfoTableCell - Template:GroupInfoTableCellLinked - Template:WorkgroupInfoTableCell - Template:WorkgroupInfoTableCellLinked Individual table (userplan): User:Larry Sanger/Userplan (demo) - Template:Userplan-all - Template:UserplanAllToWorkgroup (used in the latter) - Template:Userplan-all-workgroup - Mediawiki:Common.css Group data and examples: Template:UserinfoSystemUsers (everybody listed) - Template:UserinfoSystemUsers/Anthropology (anthro workgroup members listed) - CZ:Userinfo System Workgroup Member Lists (list of workgroup user lists in the system) - Template:WorkgroupCodeToFullName (interchanges workgroup codes and "pretty names" of workgroups) Individual data examples and templates: Template:User/Larry Sanger (demo of individual data page for all of CZ work) - Template:User/Larry Sanger/Philosophy (demo of individual data page for a workgroup) - Template:User - Template:User/Template1 (general data) - Template:User/Template2 (workgroup data) Suggestion Box Got a suggestion for me personally? I mean, you can use the Forums to make any suggestion, but if there is some big sweeping change or project or idea that probably ain't gonna happen if I don't get behind it, please let me know at Suggestion Box. Sanger's Dashboard Done I'm in the process of moving these "to do" items to a different system. My public to do will be in my {{Userplan-all}} table, above. Other plans (lower priority) Follow up (write policy on and develop) "Cold Storage" "Submit articles" button/address & process? Use wiki pages for public patron program Write policy Write mock-up pages Core Articles + What's Your Article? and What's Your Message? "Pop culture" subpages Proof subpages

Principles for our organizers' group

I've convened a small (six person) group of people who have committed to helping to organize various initiatives and generally "get stuff done." Call them organizers. We're going to talk on a regular basis and together drive a lot of new stuff forward in 2008. For my future reference (and theirs), here are some principles I have proposed for this group.

(1) Above all, what we need is maximum creativity, to achieve two goals: (a) precisely identify specific practical problems that need solving, and (b) propose specific practical solutions to those problems. No project I've ever been involved in has ever made headway without the principals constantly thinking up better practical solutions to practical problems.

(2) More specifically, our job is to organize activity. If we execute everything ourselves (individually or collectively), we are not doing our jobs. Our job is to organize and motivate others to do stuff. No doubt we will have to lead the way, and sometimes work hard in doing so. But we have to feel bold enough to call on others to help. This can be specific other known individuals, but more importantly is the power of "crowdsourcing" that is at the heart of wiki projects like CZ. We prioritize community initiatives and labor: what are the most important problems CZ faces, and needs to solve? I also welcome your help in prioritizing my own work.

(3) Our job is not to debate. Debate is great. Debate is necessary. But it is not our job. Our job is to do. Therefore, if we debate, we should debate only concerning what the best course of practical action should be. But even this debate should be kept to a minimum.

(4) Big important new initiatives do need discussion and approval. But once they're approved, go to town. Steve Ewen was given the green light to organize our image policies and resources, and he went to town--that is a perfect example of what I mean.

(5) We are not the Grand Overseers of the Citizendium. We are not The Cabal. So we do not make policy and we do not pass judgment on individuals. We are doers and organizers. If new policy is required for us to take some action, we consult the community and drive it through the proper bodies (if possible!).

(6) Our proceedings need not be particularly secret, except perhaps in very small cases...we could, if we wanted to, set up a mailing list for our group and make it open to read.

(7) We will report on our work to each other once or twice a week (we can decide later), and give each other advice and encouragement. If you stop acting for a time, you'll be dropped from the group. If some other person particularly distinguishes him or herself and would seem to fit in as a co-organizer, let's get that person into the group.

Userplan experiment