CZ:Politics Workgroup

From Citizendium
Revision as of 04:36, 5 May 2008 by imported>Andrew Alexander Wallace (→‎Core articles initiative)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata.

Politics Workgroup
Politics article All articles (1,647) To Approve (0) Editors: active (1) / inactive (15)
and
Authors: active (295) / inactive (0)
Workgroup Discussion
Recent changes Citable Articles (19)
Subgroups (9)
Checklist-generated categories:

Subpage categories:

Missing subpage categories:

Article statuses:


Core articles initiative

I think that although the articles listed in the box are reasonable, we actually need short essays which will integrate many of these ideas thematically. So, in the absence of [apparently] any other living Politics editors, I suggest a short list below --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:22, 27 September 2007 (CDT)



Main ideologies Important world leaders (2007) Theorists Political systems/forms of government

G8

Other

The box is unfinished, s

I suggest the following additions to the list:

  • under ideologies: utilitarianism
  • under theorists: Rousseau, Mill, Pericles (for the Athenian ideal of democracy) Thomas Aquinas, John Rawls.
  • under political systems: representative government (the system we now live under!)

Nick Gardner 04:49, 15 November 2007 (CSTKleineidam)


Can I also suggest we add Technocray under ideologies as well? Andrew Alexander Wallace 05:36, 5 May 2008 (CDT)

Some tentative attempts at drafting

In drafting an article on Politics and a linked article on Political Party, I have been conscious of the danger of stepping on the toes of people better qualified for that purpose. I was encouraged, however, by the belief that what was available appeared to be incomplete or obscure. But in drafting all-inclusive articles of that sort, the difficulty is how to hold the reader’s interest in the main issues without misleading him by over-simplification – and I am far from confident that I have got the balance right. I will readily withdraw if my drafts are beyond redemption in that respect, but my hope is that my fellow CZ writers will help by correcting what is misleading, and expanding the text where necessary, without insisting upon the inclusion of excessive detail that would better be in linked articles. Nick Gardner 16:48, 1 December 2007 (CST)