Talk:Alton Brown
IMDB
IMDB is a wiki for screen appearances. Most of their information is added by anonymous users, like on most wikis, and they do not claim that their information has any guarantee of accuracy. In fact their description page explains that that this system allows errors to creep in. IMDB should not be used as a reference. David Finn 01:24, 13 May 2011 (CDT)
By the way, I am not saying the information in this article is inaccurate or should be removed. I just mean that IMDB shouldn't be cited for the information. It could be replaced with a different citation or, since it is unquestionably true, even left without citation. David Finn 07:10, 13 May 2011 (CDT)
Response
David you seemed to ignore the local news coverage offered in the list of references:
Alton Brown ending Food Network’s ‘Good Eats’ after 249 episodes
3:55 pm May 12, 2011, by Rodney Ho CREDIT: AP
CREDIT: AP
Marietta food guru Alton Brown announced yesterday that after 249 episodes, he is shutting down “Good Eats,” a Food Network staple since 1999.
Beau Benton, his spokesman, confirmed that “Good Eats” will no longer be a regular series though Brown does plan three one-hour specials this year. He said Brown was not available for interviews.
Brown’s “Good Eats” has been a standard dish on Food Network’s menu for years, frequently in prime time. A fast-paced, intricately-created concoction, the show provides viewers with food history, cooking tips and oddball trivia on a single topic in Brown’s signature light-hearted and frequently sardonic tone. Over nearly 250 episodes, he chewed on almost every food subject there is, be it olives, steak or bouillabaisse. With some common staples like pasta or eggs, he’s done multiple episodes. And he’d hire local actors to play goofy parts.
One of those actors, Vickie Eng, who played the mysterious W character on about 30 episodes, said Brown put “blood, sweat and tears” into the show as director, writer and star. Her favorite moment was dangling from the ceiling Tom Cruise/”Mission Impossible” style for an episode on oysters.
Bobby Flay, another Food Network staple, said in an interview yesterday that he admires Brown for his “encyclopedic knowledge” of food and how he’s able to leverage that in multiple arenas.
Brown owns a 15,000-square-foot studio in Atlanta where he has shot “Good Eats.” Much of his staff and crew has been with him for years, a testament to his good works as a boss. “Everybody there is like family,” Eng said.
The Welch’s spokesman and author recently re-signed a new contract with Food Network and has an entrenched job with “Iron Chef” and its various incarnations. Undoubtedly, he has another show idea in his fridge.
The source is from an Atlanta newspaper and fed through the AP. This is a good source.
The IMDB offered a standard disclaimer. The IMDB started from Usenet, if I remember right, and is now owned by Amazon. As Amazon is a respected company, known for being a good Netzien, I suspect the information found within its database will be relatively accurate.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds of civility. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
Mary Ash 08:45, 13 May 2011 (CDT)
- Um, no, I didn't ignore the other reference, which isn't from IMDB, I was simply offering my opinions on IMDB. I also stressed that I didn't doubt the accuracy of the article, and I still don't.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds of civility. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
- I was commenting on IMDB.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds of civility. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
They get most of their content from regular citizens, who have gotten most of that content from news articles. This is an encyclopedia. We shouldn't be citing other encyclopedias, we should be providing citations to where they got their information.
- You have already provided a good citation, so why do we need the IMDB one? I wasn't giving you an example citation in place of the fine one you have provided above, I was just showing you an example of a better source than the IMDB one.
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
David Finn 09:57, 13 May 2011 (CDT)
Rolled back to reflect IMDB
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
Mary Ash 12:50, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds that it is needlessly inflammatory. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
- Once again
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
you have already included a good reference, and now you are edit warring to insert a superfluous one.
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds that it is needlessly inflammatory. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
- I moved the external link to the External Links page, leaving your other more appropriate source, so by reverting me
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds that it is needlessly inflammatory. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
you just added duplicate information.
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds that it is needlessly inflammatory. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
David Finn 13:37, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds of civility. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
Mary Ash 14:18, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
- People, people! I'm not taking sides on this, since I haven't bothered to read about what's going on. I can see, however, that you are either perilously close to a "revert war" or actually in one! Remember, here at CZ we absolutely do NOT permit that. Never. Not once. I'm writing this only as a Citizen, not as a Constable (which I'm not), but I just want to warn both of you that I think you're on terribly thin ice. I would hate to see you disappear at the wave of a Constable's wand, but it *could* happen if you don't find some other way to handle this situation. Best, Hayford Peirce 15:40, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
- Hayford if you wish to take a look at the references I'd appreciate it. As you are a published author, presumably have had experience with the media, I am sure your Editorial skills will prevail. There has to be an end point and I have tried to work graciously with David but it seems he refuses to acknowledge my designation as a journalism (with professional experience) author, my degree in English/Communications; followed up with my minor in history. All those qualifications would make me competent enough to evaluate sources without friendly guidance from someone who may not have those skills.Mary Ash 16:25, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
- People, people! I'm not taking sides on this, since I haven't bothered to read about what's going on. I can see, however, that you are either perilously close to a "revert war" or actually in one! Remember, here at CZ we absolutely do NOT permit that. Never. Not once. I'm writing this only as a Citizen, not as a Constable (which I'm not), but I just want to warn both of you that I think you're on terribly thin ice. I would hate to see you disappear at the wave of a Constable's wand, but it *could* happen if you don't find some other way to handle this situation. Best, Hayford Peirce 15:40, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
- Is this the source you're arguing about? http://www.tv.com/alton-brown/person/219990/biography.html It certainly doesn't seem to me to be much of a source for an encyclopedia article. I myself certainly wouldn't cite it. Hayford Peirce 17:23, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
{unindent)Nope that's not it. I used it as a secondary source as David did not like the Internet Movie Database source. The source you checked is owned by CBS Entertainment though and it could probably work........Mary Ash 17:41, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
Gotta have an Apple
This sort of gossip has no encyclopedic value and only serves as p.r. for Apple. --Peter Schmitt 18:23, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
- Absolutely. That whole section should go. This guy is just a TV chef, not a chief of state, we don't need family tidbits about him.... Hayford Peirce 18:36, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
- Below is the page I found that tells about Citizendium writing:
Write lively prose, not "encyclopedese"Writing an encyclopedia brings out a tendency in some writers to make prose dull--perhaps the influence of boring encyclopedia articles we read as children. But we can, and should, give our prose personality. Many writers today have taken William Strunk's pithy injunction, "Omit needless words," to heart. Tightening up flabby verbiage is one of the most needful improvements we can make, but we must not denature our prose entirely: we want our writing to be readable, not encyclopedese.
Another common stylistic rule would have us use simple Anglo-Saxon words rather than hifalutin, impressive-sounding words, but this does not mean that we should prefer a merely adequate word to a really apt word just because the apt word is a bit more obscure. Choose the familiar word rather than the obscure word, but the precise word rather than the loose word.
I was trying to lighten things up as this is not a serious academic article. Yes, Alton Brown is a well-known US TV personality, but writing about him does not have to be dead prose as this article is not something dealing with life or death issues. It's just short bio about someone who has managed to survive 10 years in TV Land.
I would like thank Hayford for his professional edits. I have not read the article page but I am sure he did just fine. Mary Ash 20:57, 14 May 2011 (CDT)
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
Constable cleanup
All, there is a flurry of emails coming in to the constabulary concerning this talk page, each complaining about the way that I have ruled about behavior. I usually try to leave as much material as possible so that people can follow the conversation, but I have decided to use this page as an example of what happens when I remove all but the content from talk pages. As you can see, there is really nothing here, short of three sections arguing about the quality of one reference and the accusation of wiki-stalking. From what I can tell, there is really nothing here other than a series of personal observations and semi-attacks meant to protect or discredit one author's single edit. If we remove all of those, this is what we get. I'm thinking that it would be a lot easier to read if we could remove the template language as well, but this is what we are left with when I remove everything that everyone wants me to remove.
Kind of ridiculous, isnt' it. Anyway, let's start fresh here. D. Matt Innis 08:58, 15 May 2011 (CDT)