Rydberg constant
The Rydberg constant, often denoted as R∞, originally defined empirically in terms of the spectrum of hydrogen, is given a theoretical value by the Bohr theory of the atom as (in SI units):[1]
The best value (in 2005) was:[2]
- R∞/(hc0) = 10 973 731.568 525 (8) m−1,
where h = Planck's constant and c0 = SI units defined value for the speed of light in vacuum.
Background
The Rydberg constant is the common scaling factor for all hydrogen transitions.[3] Its measurement has proven often to be a testing ground for theoretical results. The original introduction of this constant by JR Rydberg in 1889 was through a formula for the wavelengths associated with alkali metal transitions, which can be formulated for the hydrogen atom as:
where R is a constant and n and p are any integers, with n>p. The case for p=2 is called the Balmer series and for p=1 the Lyman series. The first value for the Rydberg constant was found using this formula, and was totally empirical.
In 1913 Neils Bohr developed a theory of the atom predicting the hydrogen atom to have energy levels (in SI units):
with e the electron charge, m the electron mass, ε0 the electric constant, h Planck's constant, and n the so-called principal quantum number. According to this model, the wavelength λ of a transition of an electron moving from state n to state p is then:
with c0 the SI defined valued for the speed of light in vacuum. Thus, a theoretical expression for the Rydberg constant is obtained.
Notes
- ↑ GW Series (1988). “Chapter 10: Hydrogen and the fundamental atomic constants”, The Spectrum of atomic hydrogen--advances: a collection of progress reports by experts. World Scientific, p. 485. ISBN 9971502615.
- ↑ Gilbert Grynberg, Alain Aspect, Claude Fabre (2010). Introduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press, p. 297. ISBN 0521551129.
- ↑ This discussion is based upon the review by B Cagnac, MD Plimmer, L Julien and F Biraben (1994). "The hydrogen atom, a tool for metrology". Rep. Prog. Phys. vol. 57: pp. 853-893.