Talk:Non-Borel set

Citable Version ^[?]

Advanced ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: A constructive example of a set of real numbers that is not a Borel set. [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup category: mathematics [Please add or review categories]
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: American English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - External Links - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Recipes - Citable Version

	NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
	I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies.
	Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice.

Wikipedia has article with same title

WP article "Non-Borel set", version of 23 Aug 2008, was used. I am its sole author. Boris Tsirelson 06:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)