CZ:Proposals/Simplify Core Articles Initiative

From Citizendium
< CZ:Proposals
Revision as of 13:49, 22 April 2008 by imported>Anthony Argyriou (→‎Complete explanation: modify somewhat)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This proposal has not yet been assigned to any decisionmaking group or decisionmaker(s).
The Proposals Manager will do so soon if and when the proposal or issue is "well formed" (including having a driver).
For now, the proposal record can be found in the new proposals queue.


Driver: Anthony Argyriou

Complete explanation

A complete explanation would consist of a complete rewriting of the rules on CZ:Core Articles.  However, a properly simplified and attractive version of those rules could be very short and therefore not too hard to write. 

Based on a limited discussion with Larry and the original list, here are some ideas:

  • Give people credit for two-paragraph-long stubs.
  • Anyone may write his or her name next to an article to "take credit for starting it." This is not done by any editor or Core Articles Coordinator.
  • Get rid of the "stages" system. That means getting rid of the notion of "blessing" the list. Anyone can edit the article list, although as before, editors should enjoy extra latitude in refining the lists in their areas of expertise.
  • Make the list a list of all the top articles on a subject, not just the ones created after a certain date. Bonus: Core Articles becomes an excellent starting-point for the most important articles about the most important topics.
  • Open up the miscellaneous category to augmentation and organization ad nauseam by anyone.
  • Get rid of the point system. Or make it one point, one article.
  • Redo the points page.
  • Install a new Core Articles Coordinator who will post the latest points on Citizendium-L on a weekly basis, and generally act as cheerleader for the effort.

Some workgroups got quite thoroughly set up under the previous system, and it would be wasteful to undo all that work. Accordingly, most simplification proposals will be worded in a way which allows the more complex structures to remain, but does not require workgroups to implement the full proposal.

Reasoning

The reasoning behind the proposal, or behind the various options offered in the issue. Make sure it is clear what problem you're trying to solve (or opportunity you're trying to leverage), and the proposal would solve the problem.

Implementation

A practical "to do list" type explanation of how the proposal will be implemented, and who will implement it. If there is no one to implement the proposal (as, for example, with many technical or recruitment proposals), then it is automatically declined.

Discussion

A discussion section, to which anyone may contribute.


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):