Talk:Light

From Citizendium
Revision as of 16:46, 7 June 2007 by imported>Greg Woodhouse (Article needs work - apology)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Article Checklist for "Light"
Workgroup category or categories No categories listed [Please add or review categories]
Article status Not specified
Underlinked article? Not specified
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Robert W King 14:04, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






[[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category:General Category Check|]] [[Category:General Category Check|]] [[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category:Advanced Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Developed Articles|]] [[Category:Advanced Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Developing Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Stub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category:Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]] [[Category:General Cleanup|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]]

Moving Quantum section

...into the greater narrative to make the entry less WP-like.--Robert W King 10:32, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Reinstated QM - as light IS QM in effect and description. - you may consider this an editor decision. Robert Tito |  Talk 

Photoelectric effect

The basic idea is that individual photons carry a fixed amount of energy. It increases with frequency (which is why X-rays and UV light can be dangerous), but is otherwise fixed. Now, if you shine a bright light on an electric plate many, many photons will collide with the plate, potentially displacing electrons when they do. There is a certain amount of energy needed to displace an electron from an atom, creating current (or a "click" from a detector). As you start to reduce the light level, the number of photons is reduced, but not the energy. This means that individual photons are still able to displace electrons, but there are fewer of them, and so fewer clicks.

Incidentally, Albert Einstein received the Nobel Prize for his work on the photoelectric effect. Greg Woodhouse 14:49, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Article needs work

More generally, there are a number of inaccurate or misleading statements in this article. I'm afraid I'm in a bit of a rush and can't really point them out just now, but I'd start with the introduction: light is not the same thing as the transition between energy levels that can cause atoms to emit photons. Greg Woodhouse 15:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

I fixed the wording; I hope the intro is more accurate now. The article was only created yesterday.--Robert W King 15:19, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

I understand that, and I didn't mean to be rude. As it happens I had to run (two, no three meetings) and I was trying to say what I wanted to say too quickly. Greg Woodhouse 17:46, 7 June 2007 (CDT)