Talk:Computer

Article Checklist for "Computer"

Workgroup category or categories	Computers Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status	Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article?	No
Basic cleanup done?	No
Checklist last edited by	Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

Copied from the CZ:Notice Board

Is there any objection to put a deepening layer in the Computers pages? I would suggest the following layer between computers and the final detail pages: Computer Science Science of Computers and Computer Linguistics and Semantics (Generally the first two are distinguished as follows: deployment of science, pure science (theoretical) and logics, linguistics and semantics oriented.

Thanks.

Rob

That sounds fine to me. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "deepening layer" and breaking computer linguistics /semantics out from the rest of Computer Science is something I'd have to see more about, but overall - sounds great, please get started. I'll watch this page (with the watch tab above) and help out where I can. JesseWeinstein 16:08, 24 November 2006 (CST)

Delete the link between the Computers page to the Computers article

Hello,

I am figuring out how to delete the present link between Computers and the file Computers and inserting a choice layer inbetween, containing the proposed diversion of topics.

Any help???

thanks Cassiopeia 22:07, 7 December 2006 (CST)Robert Tito

Discussion Area

following here Robert Tito | Talk 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Shouldn't the article be cleaned up before approval. It has at least still missing pictures (I copied them over from WP) and a strange, unnumbered "18" reference. Some real world references which don't expire (i.e. books) would also be nice. Or are we assuming the editors do that? --Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

Moving

I'm moving this to the singular form of the title. No reason for it to live at "computers" rather than "computer." --Larry Sanger 09:24, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

Professional Societies

I made ACM and the IEEE Computer Scociety into external links. Certainly my intent is not discourage articles on those particular organizations. Rather, it just seems that a link to the organization itself is preferable to a red link. If someone does write an article on either of these organizations, it would, of course, make sense to relink them. But how does one track such things?