| The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right.
|
Do you see this on PREVIEW? then SAVE! before following a link.
A - For a New Cluster use the following directions
Subpages format requires a metadata page.
Using the following instructions will complete the process of creating this article's subpages.
- Click the blue "metadata template" link below to create the page.
- On the edit page that appears paste in the article's title across from "
pagename =".
- You might also fill out the checklist part of the form. Ignore the rest.
- For background, see Using the Subpages template Don't worry--you'll get the hang of it right away.
- Remember to hit Save!
 the "metadata template".
However, you can create articles without subpages. Just delete the {{subpages}} template from the top of this page and this prompt will disappear. :) Don't feel obligated to use subpages, it's more important that you write sentences, which you can always do without writing fancy code.
|
B - For a Cluster Move use the following directions
The metadata template should be moved to the new name as the first step. Please revert this move and start by using the Move Cluster link at the top left of the talk page.
The name prior to this move can be found at the following link.
|
|
'Titanic switch'
Perhaps the most persistent conspiracy theory surrounding the Titanic tragedy is the idea that the ship was deliberately sunk as part of an insurance scam.[1] This is sometimes referred to as the 'Titanic switch' because it also includes the claim that the name of the Titanic was swapped with that of its sister ship Olympic, and that therefore the 'real' Titanic sailed on for over 20 years of safe and reliable service while Olympic rested at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Proponents of this view allege that, following a well-documented collision involving the Olympic a few years earlier, the owners of the vessels discovered that the Titanic's sister ship was far more damaged than publicly disclosed. Fearing that insurers would refuse to pay out, they opted to rename the ship, scuttle it, make this look like an accident and collect the insurance money. Evidence for any of this is limited and would have required the owners to recklessly endanger many people. The plot also stretches credulity since it would presumably have involved a great many people to be involved to have carried out and covered up the switch, who then all took the secret to their graves. Finally, analysis of the wreck itself has for most commentators put the theory to rest.[2]
Roman Catholic conspiracy
This conspiracy theory relies on the belief that the Roman Catholic church had long plotted world domination, and in 1912 sought to eliminate opposition to such a takeover by orchestrating the sinking of a vessel packed with likely opponents to its plans to create the U.S. Federal Reserve and thence control the global economy.[3]
- ↑ See Gardiner, R. (2009) Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank?
- ↑ For a lengthy refutation, see Hall, S. and B. Beveridge (2004) Olympic & Titanic: The Truth Behind the Conspiracy.
- ↑ See the preface of Hall and Beveridge (2004) for a brief refutation.
