Talk:Scientology
I'm without doubt that this article will seem very incomplete. I would ask that people discuss before removing (what I think is) well referenced information. I went through a fair amount of work to present the information as cleanly as possible and attribute to sources of information present on the internet. I had to quote two lectures that are not present on the internet, as far as I know. They can be purchased by anyone by going to bridge pubs, and probably via email, asking them for the lecture by its attributed title and date. Terry E. Olsen 18:45, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
If you could consider re-wording your article to include less subjunctive and passive tense, and make it more, well, active tense and statement-like. As a non-Scientologist, I cannot understand this very well. Thanks.--Peter A. Lipson 15:08, 30 April 2007 (CDT)
- Thank you Mr Lipson, will do. Also, I've moved it to Scientology (the philosophy) and will create Scientology (the religion) and then a disambiguation page. So the three should list out for any "go" or "search" as:
- Scientology (disambiguation)
- Scientology (the philosophy)
- Scientology (the religion) Terry E. Olsen 09:04, 1 May 2007 (CDT)