Talk:Verifiability theory of meaning
Workgroup category or categories | Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 21:57, 3 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
First, it's not clear to me that this article is needed; the "verifiability theory of meaning" is the verification principle. The article starts by saying that the former is only derived from the latter, but goes on (correctly) to treat them as the same.
Secondly, it needs a lot of work in any case. Aside from copy-editing issues, it contains much rather vague gesturing at what unnamed people have suggested, argued, etc., in unnamed places. I've removed a couple of extreme cases, but more needs to be done.
Ah, I've just discovered that it's a Wikipedia article, which was turned into a redirect to Verificationist. --Peter J. King Talk 09:15, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
- Philosophy Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup