Template talk:Checklist

From Citizendium
Revision as of 17:48, 6 April 2007 by imported>Catherine Woodgold (Maybe the archives box needs more work? Maybe it should be a separate template?)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm working on an updated version of this checklist at User:Catherine Woodgold/checklist v1.1.

The main thing I'm doing is: I'm replacing repetetive code with calls to Template:Yes-or-no (which I seem to have accidentally created with a capital letter at the beginning of its title; I meant "yes-or-no".) This should have no effect at all on how the template displays, but cuts down the length of the code, hopefully making it easier to read and maintain.

I feel that more documentation is also needed. Us poor newbies who have just been told that there are no acronyms here don't necessarily immediately realize that "abc" means "form of title for purposes of putting into alphabetical order, e.g. 'Smith, John'" or even that "y" means "yes" or, most importantly, that "check: yes" means "yes, it needs to be checked" as opposed to "yes, it has been checked and is OK". --Catherine Woodgold 12:07, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree with your comments here. Also, since you seem interested, check out the talk:biology/Draft page for an alternative 'look' that I was working on. Note that I incorporated the talk archive box into the options too, although that might well be too convoluted. Chris Day (Talk) 12:27, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

Nifty colouring! I have no strong opinion about including the talk archives or not; probably better to include links to the archives than not, I guess. I haven't looked into the mechanics of that part. Now I'm just wondering: How do we incorporate all these changes into one final version? We now have 3 versions of the template. I could re-do my changes: about 6 edits, 6 multiline deletions and one multiline addition of documentation. How extensive are your changes? Note that Larry Sanger has edited this version of the template more recently than your fork. How do we go about requesting permission to edit the actual template?
By the way: Thanks for responding! I'm very new to Citizendium and you're pretty much the first human I've run into, besides someone who apparently noticed my request to delete a page. Nice to have interaction! --Catherine Woodgold 12:56, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
Always nice to meet a human now and then :) My changes do not alter the check list code apart from adding extra code for the talk archives. The rest is style changes that are a shell for the code that already exists. Note my experimetal template is just for me to play with, nothing official. Originally i had made those changes to the working checklist and discussed it with larry on his talk page. The problem is that i could never recreate the problem that he had on IE using my MAC's. Since i could not recreate the problem I could not trouble shoot it, so i let it lie dormant, however, your renewed interest makes me think this might be worth resusitating. If you look at my sandbox you will see a copy of the page where Larry saw the wrapping problem. i wonder if you can see it or not? Chris Day (Talk) 13:42, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
This is weird: I can't seem to get to your main user page. Only your talk page. Where's your biography?
I looked on your talk page and the talk page of your test template Template:Experimental (which is empty) but I can't find your discussion with Larry about the wraparound problem. Could you tell me where it is?
Actually, the archive links at your experimental version of checklist, Template:Experimental may need more work. At the Talk:biology/Draft, it displays a link called "Archives", but instead of the link going to an archived talk page, it goes to some sort of template. In cases where there are no archived talk pages, there should be no link given at all. In cases where there are archived talk pages, probably there will need to be more than one link, going to more than one page of archives. Actually, perhaps it's better to "do one thing and do it well": a template for linking to talk page archives should probably be a separate template and perhaps have more options. Is there a standard format for archiving talk pages? Likely such standards aren't solidified yet, so I don't see how your template can know where to find the talk page archives. I could be wrong about that.
If you make the archives box a separate template which can be called by the checklist template, then the archives box could also be useful for archiving user talk pages and other pages.
The sandbox link you gave is a redlink (link to a nonexistent page).
I hate to admit it, but I have access to Internet Explorer. I displayed it on that and it looks OK to me. If you narrow the window, first the archives box moves to above the checklist box; then if you narrow it further, both boxes disappear -- but that's a pretty narrow window. --Catherine Woodgold 18:48, 6 April 2007 (CDT)