Talk:Daniel Everette Hale: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎provenance: new section)
(Provenance)
Line 4: Line 4:


This article is entirely my own work, first started in the wikipedia's userspace.  The wikipedia now has an article on Hale, started after this draft.  I had nothing to do with it, and this article is entirely my work.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 20:59, 19 May 2022 (CDT)
This article is entirely my own work, first started in the wikipedia's userspace.  The wikipedia now has an article on Hale, started after this draft.  I had nothing to do with it, and this article is entirely my work.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 20:59, 19 May 2022 (CDT)
* [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat]], WRT attribution to the wikipedia, as per [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service|Feist v Rural]], the SCOTUS ruled that ordinary ''"lists of facts"'' are not protected by copyright, in the United States.  Copyright protection requires at least a ''"spark of creativity"'' - their wording.
: You added {{tl|WPAttribution}}.  I think merely adding references taken from elsewhere, even if they are taken word for word, does not require  {{tl|WPAttribution}}, because references are simple ''"lists of facts"''.
: Images also do not require {{tl|WPAttribution}}, because their specific licensing terms are on the image's description page... [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Daniel_Everette_Hale.jpg#Licensing Licensing ], in this particular case.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 17:19, 16 April 2024 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:19, 16 April 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Military, Law and Politics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


provenance

This article is entirely my own work, first started in the wikipedia's userspace. The wikipedia now has an article on Hale, started after this draft. I had nothing to do with it, and this article is entirely my work. George Swan (talk) 20:59, 19 May 2022 (CDT)

  • Pat, WRT attribution to the wikipedia, as per Feist v Rural, the SCOTUS ruled that ordinary "lists of facts" are not protected by copyright, in the United States. Copyright protection requires at least a "spark of creativity" - their wording.
You added {{WPAttribution}}. I think merely adding references taken from elsewhere, even if they are taken word for word, does not require {{WPAttribution}}, because references are simple "lists of facts".
Images also do not require {{WPAttribution}}, because their specific licensing terms are on the image's description page... Licensing , in this particular case. George Swan (talk) 17:19, 16 April 2024 (CDT)