Nuclear power reconsidered/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Weapons Proliferation: add Ashley 2012)
(→‎The Renewables Only debate: add video of Conley & Maloney)
Line 14: Line 14:
*{{cite book|author=Mark Z. Jacobson|title=100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything|edition=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2020|id=ISBN 1108790836}}
*{{cite book|author=Mark Z. Jacobson|title=100% Clean, Renewable Energy and Storage for Everything|edition=|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2020|id=ISBN 1108790836}}
**Christopher Clack ''et al.'' (2017) critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal [https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722.full ''Proc. National Academy of Sciences'' 114(26):6722-27].
**Christopher Clack ''et al.'' (2017) critique of Jacobson's 100% Renewables Proposal [https://www.pnas.org/content/114/26/6722.full ''Proc. National Academy of Sciences'' 114(26):6722-27].
**Mike Conley, Tim Maloney (2017) [http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap.
**Mike Conley, Tim Maloney (2017) [http://www.roadmaptonowhere.com Roadmap to Nowhere] critique of Jacobson’s Roadmap. A [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2KNqluP8M0 video summary].


*Heard BP ''et al.'' (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' 76:1122–33 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114]
*Heard BP ''et al.'' (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems ''Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews'' 76:1122–33 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114]

Revision as of 17:44, 15 March 2024

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
A list of key readings about Nuclear power reconsidered.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.

General References

The Renewables Only debate

  • Heard BP et al. (2017) Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 76:1122–33 dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.114
  • Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists (2021) Advanced Isn’t Always Better Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors.

Videos

Safety

Waste Management

Weapons Proliferation

  • Deutch et.al. 2006, Making the world safe for nuclear energy, Survival 46(4):65-79 DOI:10.1080/00396330412331342466
  • Kryuchkov et.al. 2011, Isotopic Uranium and Plutonium Denaturing as an Effective Method for Nuclear Fuel Proliferation Protection in Open and Closed Fuel Cycles, DOI:10.5772/17822 How nuclear fuel can be made useless for bombs by denaturing (diluting fissile isotopes with hard-to-separate non-fissile, e.g. diluting U-235 with U-238) and by adding a radiation barrier (isotopes that will make stolen fuel easy to detect, hard to handle, and make a bomb fizzle, not detonate).
  • Ashley, S., Parks, G., Nuttall, W. et al. Thorium fuel has risks. Nature 492, 31–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/492031a

Cost

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020 International Energy Agency's 223 page report, a thorough explanation of the complexities of LCOE (Levelized Cost of Electricity) and a proposal for a better all-in-one measure of cost VALCOE.
INSIDER: Not All Electricity Is Equal—Uses and Misuses of Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) World Resources Institute (2019) Laura M. Valeri. Read this to understand why there is so much confusion over the cost of various sources in discussions on the Internet.

Reactor Designs