Talk:Ear: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Brent Kiernan m (Talk:The ear moved to Talk:Ear: Why "the"?) |
imported>Brent Kiernan mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | {{checklist | ||
| abc = Ear | | abc = Ear | ||
| cat1 = Biology | | cat1 = Biology | ||
| cat2 = | | cat2 = |
Revision as of 08:02, 18 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Supten 22:23, 9 March 2007 (CST) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Classification
Is all of the lead applicable to all vertebrates? There seems no place in the article for the discussion of non-human vertebrates--not even other mammals. Is the article talking only about vertebrates. And shouldn't the first ref be an anatomical authority, not a 4 p. clinical review? DavidGoodman 21:57, 2 November 2006 (CST)
Categories:
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup